Tag Archives: Test development/management

December 2023—Hoi-Ying Elsie Yu, PhD, D(ABCC), isn’t new to workflow optimization. As system director of chemistry, point-of-care testing, and preanalytics for Geisinger Medical Center in Danville, Pa., for the past decade, she has undertaken initiatives to maximize efficiency in complicated parts of the laboratory whenever she can.

July 2021—From takeout margaritas to the embrace of remote work, the pandemic upended convention, leaving behind permanent changes that were nowhere on the radar in 2019. In the world of pathology informatics, the new online COVID-19 data dashboards at the Cleveland Clinic illustrate how much the pandemic has raised the profile of data analytics in managing the laboratory.

January 2021—Susan Butler-Wu, PhD, D(ABMM), is clear about who she is and what she does. “I’m just a microbiologist,” she says. But in a viral pandemic, a microbiologist—and everyone else associated with clinical laboratory testing—becomes so much more than the job title. (For the record, Dr. Butler-Wu is director of the clinical microbiology laboratory, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, and associate professor of clinical pathology, Keck School of Medicine of USC.) Likewise, a test becomes more than a lab value. The very fact that testing has become the focus of national discourse is a testament to the upending nature of the pandemic, she says. “The public are having conversations about Ct values. It’s mind-blowing.”

April 2015—St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, brings a razor-sharp focus to its mission: the 78-bed institution cares for children with catastrophic illnesses, including leukemias and lymphomas, solid tumors, hematology disorders (including sickle cell disease), and infectious diseases. It doesn’t have an emergency department. Consistent with its goal of advancing cures, all its patients are enrolled in research protocols.

September 2013—A handful, a fraction of a percent, a tiny portion. In most institutions, that’s about how many tests are cancelled after they’ve been ordered and a specimen has been sent to the laboratory. But even that small number can have significant quality implications. The authors of the Q-Probes study, ”Reasons for Test Cancellation,” looked at more than a million specimen accessions at several dozen institutions, to get a fix on why tests are being cancelled and to gain insight into how laboratories can bring that number down. As the study makes clear, there is definitely room for improvement.