Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.
Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy, CEO of mTuitive.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Wednesday, June 24, 2026, 12:00–1:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the expanded clinical utility of HER2 IHC scoring in metastatic breast cancer and its impact on your practice
Webinar presenters Michelle Shiller, DO, AP, CP, MGP, FACP, Baylor University Medical Center.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
August 2015—After years of reading the latest news from the CMS with dread, pathologists and independent laboratories have some reason for revelry this summer as the agency’s proposed physician fee schedule offers an overall uptick in Medicare payment for 2016. Yet it is the final physician fee schedule, due in November, that will tell whether pathologists feel grateful toward the CMS when Thanksgiving rolls around.
July 2015—Technically, it’s true: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ new program, the Individualized Quality Control Plan, is a voluntary, alternative option that clinical laboratories can use to customize their QC plans according to test method, patient population, environment, and personnel competency.
July 2015—Amid excitement about the groundbreaking work of unlocking the human genome’s secrets to speed diagnosis and target oncologic treatment comes the unpleasant reality that much of this labor now goes unpaid. Getting the American Medical Association’s editorial panel to publish nearly two dozen new genomics-related CPT codes for molecular pathology was a vital step, as was having those codes accepted in the Medicare clinical laboratory fee schedule.
April 2015—Sometimes major changes to a health care organization’s point-of-care testing system come from powerful regulatory agencies in Washington, DC. Or they may arise when a child with diabetes objects to frequent venipuncture. In either kind of case, experts say, pathologists and laboratory professionals must form strong relationships with clinicians and build structural foundations to help them meet these and other demands.
March 2015—Turning points emerge in retrospect, but I’m ready to put a red pushpin at December 2013 on the evolutionary timeline for pathology graduate medical education. Twenty-four pathology education organizations came together that month for a workforce summit sponsored by the CAP, the American Society for Clinical Pathology, the Association of Pathology Chairs, and the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology that would refine consensus on how to best shape the future of our specialty.
February 2015—Two medical organizations said that using an HPV test alone for cervical cancer screening is an effective alternative to the current recommendation for screening with either cytology alone or cotesting with cytology and HPV testing. Pathology leaders said the multispecialty-developed guidance leaves the Pap test standing as a first-line screening option.
November 2014—Amid initial confusion over Ebola-related safety protocols for health professionals providing direct patient care, laboratory professionals report hearing a consistent message from the CDC on proper specimen handling. The pressing question for laboratories is how best to approach testing with potential Ebola patients given the dual imperatives of preventing exposure and offering faster diagnostic answers.
October 2013—Culturing organisms is not always easy. Some microbes are fastidious. Others are below the limits of detection. And still others are just difficult to culture, for no discernible reason.
October 2013—This is my first column, and it’s only good manners to introduce myself.
October 2013—Since 1942, when penicillin was first used to treat infections caused by gram-positive bacteria, many improved and potent beta-lactam antimicrobials have been developed. Yet today, if a patient in an intensive care unit develops a bloodstream infection with Staphylococcus aureus, that person has a one in three chance of dying. High mortality rates apply to many other pathogens that cause bloodstream infections in ICU patients—from one in five for coagulase-negative staphylococci and Escherichia coli to almost 40 percent for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida spp. Enterobacter spp and Enterococcus spp have intermediate mortality rates: one in four and one in three, respectively. Even among patients on a non-ICU ward, bloodstream infections are associated with mortality rates between 20 percent and 30 percent.
