Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

Information Technology

Pathologists, vendors talk LIS-IMS integration

February 2026—Cybersecurity and image management are key concerns for laboratories adopting digital pathology and AI. While cloud-based systems offer enhanced security and scalability, onboarding new vendors and instruments remains challenging due to stringent security requirements and potential vulnerabilities.

AI ‘bottleneck’: putting the algorithms to work

January 2026—Despite significant advancements in algorithm development, implementing AI in clinical practice faces a bottleneck. The challenge lies in operationalizing these algorithms within existing clinical workflows, requiring infrastructure, reimbursement structures, and validation frameworks.

Working out AI validation and implementation

The CAP Artificial Intelligence Committee is developing a guide for laboratories on implementing AI, covering the entire machine learning life cycle. While laboratories can begin using AI now, they must ensure full validation, even for FDA-approved tools, due to potential biases and population drift.

LIS vendors, lab experts on standards and stakeholders

A roundtable discussion on laboratory information systems (LIS) focused on the application of AI in lab workflows. Participants emphasized the need for AI to be used as a targeted tool to augment human work, highlighting its potential in streamlining documentation, coding, and data extraction. 

AI starting points and stepping stones

Laboratories considering AI-driven workflows should first identify the specific problem they aim to solve and assess if simpler coding solutions are sufficient. While out-of-the-box AI solutions from vendors offer a lower barrier to entry, laboratories must ensure these solutions align with their workflows and validate them in their own environments.

Resources, interfaces—LIS vendors and lab experts talk

November 2025—A roundtable discussion on laboratory information systems (LIS) highlighted the challenges labs face in meeting increasing demands with limited resources. The conversation emphasized the need for improved interoperability, automation, and flexibility in LIS to address complex testing workflows and workforce shortages.

Digital pathology leaders on momentum and AI

September 2025—Leaders of the Digital Pathology Association met online with CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle to talk about digital pathology and much that’s related: adoption, investment, and artificial intelligence tools. “Most people are playing catch-up,” Marilyn Bui, MD, PhD, past president of the DPA and a member of the association’s board of directors, said of digital pathology. Of AI and digital pathology, DPA Foundation president Michael Rivers of Roche Tissue Diagnostics said, “Over the next several years we’re going to see a transformation in pathology.”

Views on digital pathology, AI, and the AP LIS

February 2025—Digital pathology, artificial intelligence, and anatomic pathology computer systems—seven participants in a Dec. 10, 2024 online roundtable talked with CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle about their experiences, plans, and predictions. Large academic center practices and small pathology practices—they considered all perspectives. Here is what they told us.

LIS experts on HL7, AI, home-test results, and more

Lab data displays, IT demands that outrun resources, at-home test results, and HL7 are some of what came up on Sept. 20 when CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle spoke online with pathologists and industry executives about laboratory information systems. “It’s fire and forget,” said Ulysses G. J. Balis, MD, of the University of Michigan, about the lack of feedback from the EHR that a clinician has seen and understood a complex result. “Loss to follow-up is a real possibility,” he said.