Tuesday, October 20, 2026, 11 AM-12 PM ET
Hear experts review the biological and clinical significance of the HER2 expression continuum in breast tissue, providing a clearer understanding of how these variations might impact diagnosis, and discuss the emerging importance of documenting HER2-low and HER2-ultralow categories using a validated IHC assay.
Webinar presenters Keith Wharton, MD, PhD, Global Medical Affairs Leader–Pathology, Roche Diagnostics Solutions, and Hannah Y. Wen, MD, PhD, Director, Breast Pathology Fellowship, Associate Team Leader, Breast Pathology Team, Attending Pathologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Roche.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Thursday, October 29, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the evolving role of PD-L1 testing in HNSCC and ovarian cancer.
Webinar presenter Georgios Deftereos, MD, Professor of Pathology, Associate Director of the Clinical Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Director of Molecular Cytopathology, University of California, San Francisco
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Agilent.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Tuesday, November 3, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the challenges of detecting NRG1 fusions and how RNA-based testing can support more comprehensive fusion identification in clinical practice.
Webinar presenter Benjamin Weinberg, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine and Attending Physician
specializing in gastrointestinal medical oncology
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Diaceutics.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Monday, November 16, 2026, 12:30 PM-2 PM ET
Hear experts discuss a multidisciplinary approach to oncopathology for HER2
assessments for solid tumors in the absence of a companion diagnostic.
Webinar presenters Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD, Chair, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Medical Director, Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Emina E. Torlakovic, MD, PhD, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, and Carol Cheung, MD, PhD, JD, FRCPC, Deputy Director, Canadian Biomarker Quality, Assurance—Programme canadien d’assurance de la qualité des biomarqueurs
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
February 2024—Anatomic and clinical pathology reporting—what’s working, what’s missing. Three pathologists (all board certified in informatics) and representatives of three information system companies met online Dec. 19 with CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle to talk about reporting needs, the changes, what’s optimal. The first half of their discussion begins here; the second half will be published in the March issue.
February 2024—Even before the pandemic, burnout had become a major issue in medicine. Today, the effects of too much stress, staff shortages, and increasing demands have become so widespread in health care that they cannot and should not be ignored.
February 2024—Patients receiving a pathology report may have many outstanding questions that can cause anxiety and confusion. The 21st Century Cures Act has increased patients’ access to pathology reports via delivery to patient portals. However, reports sent without further explanation can exacerbate the anxiety and confusion. Many health care institutions are creating new communication methods to help patients interpret these reports and develop a better understanding of their health status. One such approach is the pathology explanation clinic (PEC), which is an interactive visit between patients and pathologists to discuss the pathology report and review the patient’s slides.
February 2024—The gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis is the pathological examination of prostate biopsy tissue by light microscopy. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) to digitized whole slide images (WSIs) can aid pathologists in cancer diagnosis, but robust, diverse evidence in a simulated clinical setting is lacking. The authors conducted a study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of pathologists who read WSIs of prostatic biopsy specimens with and without AI assistance. Eighteen pathologists, two of whom were genitourinary subspecialists, evaluated 610 prostate needle core biopsy WSIs prepared at 218 institutions, with the option for deferral. Two evaluations were performed sequentially for each WSI: the first without assistance and the second, conducted immediately thereafter, aided by Paige Prostate (Paige, New York City).
February 2024—Precision cancer medicine relies heavily on understanding the genomic landscape of tumors. Prior comparisons between African and European ancestry, though based on limited data, have indicated distinct differences in the landscape of cancer driver alterations between these populations. Whether these discrepancies are mediated by genetic variants or environmental influences is still unclear. Accurately characterizing ancestry-associated genomic alterations is essential to not only improving genomic diagnostic testing but also to developing targeted therapies, biomarkers, and personalized cancer care for diverse populations. The authors conducted a study that leveraged two large genomic cohorts to investigate the relationship between genomic alterations and African ancestry in six common cancers: prostate, pancreas, ovary, nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal, and breast.
Feburary 2024
Q. In a case of suspected drug-related death, how specific can an autopsy be in identifying the drug(s) that might have caused the person’s death and the amount of drugs present? For example, can a toxicology report say a person’s death was caused by a fake oxycodone pill containing fentanyl? Read answer.
Q. A nephrology patient who has been treated with vitamin D2 for several years contacted our laboratory to find out why their 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of 60 ng/mL is now considered elevated when before it was within the normal range. How can we explain this? Read answer.
February 2024—The key to using ChatGPT and other large language models effectively in pathology is understanding not only what they are designed to do but, just as importantly, what they are not designed to do, says Eric Glassy, MD, medical director at Affiliated Pathologists Medical Group, Rancho Dominguez, Calif., and past chair of the CAP Information Technology Leadership Committee.
February 2024—Members of the CAP Machine Learning Working Group, Informatics Committee, Digital and Computational Pathology Committee, and Council on Informatics and Pathology Innovation have proposed 15 recommendations for evaluating the performance of machine learning-based clinical decision support systems in pathology.
January 2024—Sometimes even superb ideas can also turn out to be quite, well, bothersome. Zoom meetings. Bridal showers. Bike lanes. Parking apps. QR menu codes. And—if laboratories aren’t careful—the same can be true of pharmacogenomic testing. Just ask Ann Moyer, MD, PhD, associate professor, laboratory medicine and pathology, Mayo Clinic. When it comes to pharmacogenomic testing, laboratory medicine brings significant expertise to the table. But in clinical settings, physicians who prescribe the medications need to be familiar with how to use the test results. They also need to work with the lab to decide which tests, for which genes or gene-drug pairs, will be most helpful for their patients, she says. “Especially if you’re going to start incorporating clinical support alerts into the EHR,” adds Dr. Moyer, who was chair of (until Dec. 31; she is now advisor to) the CAP/ACMG Biochemical and Molecular Genetics Committee. “If the practice doesn’t actually want them, then you’re just going to end up annoying them.”
January 2024—Thrombophilia testing has been shown to be performed far more often than indicated in thromboembolic events, at significant cost to the patient and hospital.
