Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.
Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications.
Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.
Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.
Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.
Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy, CEO of mTuitive.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
August 2013—Theatergoers don’t want to see theunderstudy. Passengers don’t want to encounter a series of “flight delayed” messages on the departures board. And while it may not be every laboratory’s worst nightmare, no pathologist wants to open a letter from a government agency or payer that starts out, “It has come to our attention,” followed with words like “violation” and “false claim.”
August 2013—Robert L. Michel doesn’t claim to have all the answers to all the problems laboratory medicine now faces. But as editor-in-chief of The Dark Report, the industry intelligence publication, he knows what those problems are chapter and verse. He also sees where future problems lie.
August 2013—In ancient Rome, the legions might gird for combat with a muscled cuirass, helmet, and greaves, and carry a pilum. But none of them ever had to confront a hospital system C-suite, with high-level executives whose titles start with “chief” deciding between a single, enterprisewide information system or a “best-of-breed” laboratory information system.
August 2013—Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant syndrome that predisposes patients to multiple malignancies. LS has traditionally been thought of as a colorectal-cancer-dominated syndrome; however, the incidence of endometrial cancer in women with LS actually exceeds that of colorectal cancer. Here we report a case of a woman with metachronous colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer, with the goal of increasing awareness of the need to screen endometrial cancer patients for LS. Identifying these patients is important not only for the patient but also for other family members who would benefit from genetic counseling and surveillance for LS-associated malignancies.
August 2013—Many people don’t know what we pathologists do. This is concerning, especially when some of the same people are responsible for determining levels and allocation of funding for graduate medical education, keeping our training programs open, or encouraging careers in pathology. I hope this column ignites a sense of urgency around funding for pathology training and recruiting a strong workforce, for without both our patients will suffer an indefensible loss.
August 2013—At CAP ’11, then president-elect Stanley Robboy, MD, sat at a table in a conference room. He didn’t know those seated with him but he and they started to chat. The conversation turned to Dr. Robboy’s goals for his upcoming presidential term, and a member from Saudi Arabia, Amal Saadallah, MD, PhD, proposed that newborn screening requirements be created for accreditation.
August 2013—You have a great gynecologic cytology case, a patient with atypical endometrial cells on Pap test that you believe might represent a low-grade endometrial adenocarcinoma, but it has been four weeks and you have had no feedback about the patient’s outcome. It seems as if there have been a lot of atypical endometrial cells on Pap tests lately. Could it be due to the implementation of a new liquid-based technology for Pap tests in your laboratory? Fortunately, your laboratory performs cytologic-histologic correlation monthly, so you ask the medical director if she has noticed any trends in the rate of atypical glandular cells, and what the corresponding biopsies have shown. To your relief, the patient had a biopsy showing low-grade endometrial carcinoma, and the laboratory statistics have shown only a slight increase in atypical glandular cells since the new technology was implemented. The medical director informs you that she has been recording these data as a special QA project to determine if the increase is due to over-interpretation of reactive glandular cells, because the technology enhances nuclear and cytologic details of glandular cells.
August 2013—The field of cervical cancer screening saw many developments in 2012. In April last year, the American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology published new guidelines for cervical cancer screening, most notably raising the age at which screening should begin, extending the interval between screening tests, and giving preference to simultaneous Pap and human papillomavirus co-testing in women ages 30 to 65.1 Almost simultaneously, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force published similar screening guidelines.2 Then, in July, the CAP and ASCCP published the results of a joint project recommending a uniform Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST).3 Finally, in September the ASCCP led a consensus conference of 23 participating organizations to update guidelines for managing abnormal cervical cancer screening test results. In April of this year, these updated guidelines were published simultaneously in the Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease and Obstetrics and Gynecology.4,5
August 2013—In the May 20, 2013 issue of the New Yorker, Google co-founder Sergey Brin is quoted as saying of Internet security: “In big corporations people don’t understand what security people do, for the most part, and no one pays attention to them unless something goes wrong. Frankly, a lot of companies aren’t that interested in security.”
August 2013—FDA approves Therascreen EGFR PCR kit as companion test for Gilotrif; A guide to using the microbiology lab; Leica Biosystems acquires Kreatech; Life Tech to collaborate with Merck Serono; MDxHealth teams with HistoGeneX
