Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

February 2014

Handling a reagent recall, step by strenuous step

February 2014—Recalling a reagent is about more than just removing a product from laboratory shelves. It’s about retracting test results and thus affecting diagnoses and treatment plans. It’s about questioning patient outcomes and revisiting past decisions. “So much of what laboratories do is central to making a diagnosis and determining treatment,” says John Harbour, MD, regional medical director of HealthPartners Laboratories, medical director of the Bon Secours St. Mary’s Hospital Laboratory, and president of Monument Pathologists Inc., Richmond, Va.

Breast cancer answers, short and long

February 2014—When it comes to breast cancer, medical oncologists have two “wish lists” for their pathologist colleagues. Here’s the short list of test results they need when they sit down with a patient, courtesy of Melody Cobleigh, MD. “ER, PR, HER2,” says Dr. Cobleigh, professor of medicine and the Brian Piccolo Chair for Cancer Research, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago. It’s a direct, unassailable answer. But so, too, is saying that the assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand caused World War I.

Medicare IHC change adds to administrative burdens

February 2014—Pathologists and laboratories have found new administrative challenges following deep payment cuts and policy changes in the 2014 Medicare physician fee schedule. By the time the fee schedule was finalized Nov. 27, 2013, pathologists were left with little time to sort through the impact of the changes before they became effective Jan. 1.

Q & A Column, 2/14

February 2014—We are thinking about using a reference laboratory for HER2 FISH testing of breast carcinomas with an arrangement in which that lab performs the technical component and we perform the interpretation. A “frequently asked question” from 2011 on the CAP Web site seems to say that we must perform bright-field ISH proficiency testing to be in compliance, since we are not performing the hybridization and cannot refer PT to another laboratory. Can you clarify the PT requirement, if any, for this situation? The vendor we are dealing with has offered to establish its own FISH PT program.

Clinical Pathology Selected Abstracts, 2/14

February 2014—Comorbidity-adjusted life expectancy: a new tool to aid cancer screening strategies: Controversy surrounds how best to use cancer screening tests in the elderly and at what age to stop screening. The benefits of early cancer diagnosis and treatment decline with age because many elderly people are more likely to die of a comorbid condition or other cause than of cancer. This impacts the survival benefits of early cancer detection. One must also consider the harms of screening, including complications of further testing and treatment for a disease that may not be symptomatic in a patient’s lifetime.

Newsbytes, 2/14

February 2014—Orchard Software collaborates with Memorial Sloan-Kettering: Orchard Software has entered into a long-term agreement with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center under which Orchard will supply the cancer center with its Orchard Harvest lab information system while working with Memorial Sloan-Kettering to enhance and further develop its lab informatics products.

Anatomic Pathology Selected Abstracts, 2/14

February 2014—Early stage triple-negative breast cancer treated with mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy; Predicting recurrence after limited resection versus lobectomy for small lung adenocarcinoma; HER2 amplification in gastric cancer: a rare event restricted to intestinal phenotype; Gleason score undergrading on biopsy sample of prostate cancer; Fallopian tube intraluminal tumor spread from noninvasive precursor lesions; Factors that influence histopathological diagnosis of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia; Impact of molecular analysis on final sarcoma diagnosis; Distinguishing primary bladder adenocarcinoma from secondary involvement by colorectal adenocarcinoma; Determining if close margins warrant postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in oral squamous cell carcinoma; Three methodological approaches for defining basal-like lesions in triple-negative breast carcinoma

Testing the test—ABP administers pilot part 3 MOC exam

February 2014—All primary and subspecialty certificates that the American Board of Pathology issues are now time limited, and diplomates must successfully participate in the ABP’s Maintenance of Certification, or MOC, program to maintain certification. Part three of the four-part MOC program is the evaluation of cognitive expertise, which consists of a secure examination that assesses a diplomate’s pathology-specific knowledge, judgment, and skills.

Put It on the Board, 2/14

February 2014—When are genomic tests useful? IOM seeks answers: Collaboration among key stakeholders to set clear evidentiary standards is needed to determine the clinical utility of genome-based testing in cancer care, according to a wide variety of experts participating in an Institute of Medicine workshop. Between 1969 and 1989, genomic biomarkers were mentioned in fewer than 50,000 National Library of Medicine publications. But between 2000 and 2010, more than 250,000 articles mentioned biomarkers, said a December 2013 IOM report, “Genome-Based Diagnostics: Demonstrating Clinical Utility in Oncology: Workshop Summary.”