Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

November 2016

Molecular Pathology Selected Abstracts, 11/16

November 2016—Misclassification of genetic variants associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy has a variable clinical presentation and may lead to sudden cardiac death. In many cases, it is associated with pathogenic genetic variants, enabling screening of relatives and, possibly, the ability to individualize treatment strategies through lifestyle modification or invasive procedures.

Shorts on Standards, 11/16

November 2016—The Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program and the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Albumin in Urine are collaborating with IVD manufacturers to improve standardization of commercial measurement procedures. Urine albumin is an important biomarker for kidney damage.

In memoriam: Tyra T. Hutchens, MD | 1921–2016

November 2016—Tyra T. Hutchens, MD, who served as CAP president from 1977 to 1979, died Aug. 28 at age 94. Dr. Hutchens was CAP vice president from 1975 to 1977 and a member of the Board of Governors from 1968 to 1974. He was a member of the Executive; Standards; and Budget, Planning and Review committees and of the Council on Government Relations and Liaison and the CAP History Editorial Board.

Q&A column, 11/16

November 2016—As originally described, there are technically five Gleason patterns: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. However, since patterns 1 and 2 are never used, there are no Gleason scores 1 + 1 = 2, 1 + 2 = 3, 2 + 1 = 3, 2 + 2 = 4, 2 + 3 = 5, and 3 + 2 = 5. Why is this? Isn’t this an alteration of Gleason’s original classification concept? Furthermore, there are cases in which a biopsy may contain a few glands that are diagnostic of carcinoma but insufficient to assign an accurate Gleason score. Would it simply be best to make a descriptive comment to that effect?

Newsbytes, 11/16

November 2016—How a pathology website can help build pathology websites: What if one could Google “biopsy orientation processing cassette” and receive detailed methodological instruction in surgical pathology as easily as finding a recipe for pound cake? Izak B. Dimenstein, MD, PhD, HT(ASCP), a grossing technologist retired from Loyola University Chicago Medical Center, believes highly specific information about laboratory methodologies should be easily accessible on the Web.

Put It on the Board, 11/16

November 2016—FDA approves Ventana PD-L1 (SP142) assay, Access TSH (3rd IS) assay cleared for Beckman systems, Advanced MALDI-TOF use subject of AMP report, FDA clearance for Quidel Solana influenza A+B

AMP case report: October 2016 test yourself answers

November 2016—In the October 2016 issue was a report, “Laser capture microdissection: Vanishing roles in tissue microdissection revalued in salvaging a melanoma with micrometastasis for BRAF V600E mutation detection,” written by members of the Association for Molecular Pathology. Here are answers (in bold) to the three “test yourself ” questions that followed that case report.