Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

November 2024

Clinical pathology selected abstracts

November 2024—Pathology training programs are meant to prepare trainees for the workforce by imparting medical knowledge and developing skills in diagnostic interpretation in anatomic pathology. Yet transitioning to the workforce can be challenging for some new graduates. To address this, many training programs have begun teaching management and leadership skills that are required on the job. In addition, the College of American Pathologists New in Practice Committee developed online educational material to provide practical advice for those starting their pathology careers.

Anatomic pathology selected abstracts

November 2024—Inactivating alterations in switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex subunits have been described in multiple tumor types. Recent studies focused on SMARC subunits of this complex to explain their relationship with tumor characteristics and therapeutic opportunities. Pancreatic cancer with these alterations has not been well studied, although isolated cases of undifferentiated carcinomas have been reported.

Molecular pathology selected abstracts

November 2024—Many people with an intellectual disability do not receive a molecular diagnosis following genetic testing. While 1,427 genes have been confidently identified as etiological for an intellectual disability (ID), all but nine of them are protein coding. To identify noncoding etiologies of ID, the authors conducted a genetic association analysis using whole genome sequencing data on 77,539 participants in the 100,000 Genomes Project. The study included 29,741 probands and 4,782 affected relatives assigned by expert clinicians to one or more of 220 specific disease classes encompassing a wide range of pathologies.

Q&A column

NOVEMBER 2024 Q. Our laboratory was cited for a deficiency because the manufacturer and methodology of our tumor marker assay was not available to clinicians. What is the reasoning behind this requirement? Read answer.
Q. For patients who have a hematocrit level greater than 55 percent, is it okay to use a CBC (hematocrit) that was not collected at the same time as the citrate sample? For example, can we use a CBC collected within 24 hours for an inpatient and a CBC from a previous visit for an outpatient? Read answer.

Newsbytes

November 2024—A picture may be worth a thousand words, but a conventional two-dimensional photograph of a surgical specimen can convey only so much information to a pathologist or surgeon. Overall geometry and margin status are difficult to interpret from static, single-perspective images.

Letters

November 2024—In “Lab test use: what 1 billion claims tell us” (August issue, page 1), you detailed the conclusions of a research study that analyzed insurance claims from effectively the entire U.S. adult population. The study found what it had sought, that 14.4 million individuals tested had undergone excessive laboratory testing, which is low-value care that poses patient risks and wastes resources. In reviewing the study data and analyses, I found that the methodology did not accurately estimate overuse and that the study overlooked the conclusion the data was screaming for: We are screening far too few people for chronic diseases and need to invest in access to care.

Put It on the Board

November 2024—The College of American Pathologists on Oct. 7 filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs in the consolidated cases American Clinical Laboratory Association, et al., v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, et al., and Association for Molecular Pathology, et al., v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, et al. Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases challenge a final rule setting out the FDA’s plan to regulate LDTs as medical devices under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. “The Final Rule imposes draconian new restrictions—and crushing compliance costs—on the development and use of LDTs,” the CAP says in its amicus brief.