Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Wednesday, June 24, 2026, 12:00–1:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the expanded clinical utility of HER2 IHC scoring in metastatic breast cancer and its impact on your practice

Webinar presenters Michelle Shiller, DO, AP, CP, MGP, FACP, Baylor University Medical Center.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

CAP TODAY

On cuts and consequences, pathologists make their case

October 2013—James Richard, DO, directs CAP-Lab, an independent laboratory in Lansing, Mich., where he manages the business and does everything from signing off on pathology reports to paying the mortgage on the building. But among the many issues he tackles running his practice and in the midst of a shift in health care in the U.S., a single rule proposed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is what’s keeping him awake at night.

‘Extra’ genetic info—too much, too quickly?

October 2013—In the 1997 film “Gattaca,” the movie-going public was introduced to a world in which biology was quite literally destiny. A world in which the probabilities encoded in one’s genome dictated virtually every aspect of one’s existence and where those found genetically wanting were relegated to society’s margins. Fortunately, genomics has so far yielded nothing so nefarious nor is it ever likely to, thanks in part to the vigorous debate that accompanies advances in genetic and genomic technologies. An example of this is the debate underway, and making medical news, among physicians, ethicists, and laboratory directors over the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics’ recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings.

New guideline takes on tough HER2 cases

October 2013—In HER2 testing for breast cancer, the term “equivocal” verges on being a four-letter word. If the patient has a clearly positive test result, therapies targeting HER2 become a treatment option, and a highly successful one at that. If the result is clearly negative, HER2-targeting drugs are off the table; the patient isn’t expected to benefit from the drugs, which are expensive and can be cardio-
toxic.

Cancelled lab tests—study analyzes why

September 2013—A handful, a fraction of a percent, a tiny portion. In most institutions, that’s about how many tests are cancelled after they’ve been ordered and a specimen has been sent to the laboratory. But even that small number can have significant quality implications. The authors of the Q-Probes study, ”Reasons for Test Cancellation,” looked at more than a million specimen accessions at several dozen institutions, to get a fix on why tests are being cancelled and to gain insight into how laboratories can bring that number down. As the study makes clear, there is definitely room for improvement.

Poor testing, dosing dog fetomaternal bleeds

September 2013—If Mark Brecher, MD, were compiling a greatest hits list of medical successes of the 20th century, there’s one advance he’d be sure to include: the introduction of Rh immune globulin in the late 1960s to prevent the Rh sensitization of Rh-negative mothers who deliver an Rh-positive baby.

ALK-positive NSCLC—patient’s story opens eyes

September 2013—For good or bad, Matthew Hiznay seems to be an odds beater.

First, a minority of lung cancer patients have never smoked. He’s one of them, having been diagnosed with late-stage non-small-cell lung cancer in August 2011. Obviously, that’s the bad.

With molecular testing, better infection control

September 2013—Rapid and accurate molecular assays have gradually infiltrated the field of bacterial diagnosis. For several potentially lethal nosocomial pathogens—Clostridium difficile, vancomycin-resistant enterococcus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—FDA-approved molecular assays are making a difference. Not only have they improved the accuracy of diagnosis, benefiting patients and clinicians, they have also been a boon to infection control practitioners.

For prenatal NGS labs, new accreditation requirements

September 2013—With the 2013 edition of the Laboratory Accreditation Program checklist, the College moves to a new level in its effort to ensure the highest-quality practices in clinical laboratories’ use of next-generation DNA sequencing.

AMP case report: aCGH as a diagnostic aid in a childhood Spitzoid melanoma

September 2013—CAP TODAY and the Association for Molecular Pathology have teamed up to bring molecular case reports to CAP TODAY readers. Here, this month, is the third such case. (See the February 2013 issue for the first, on multilocus sequencing for rapid identification of molds, and last month’s issue for the second, on the importance of screening for Lynch syndrome in patients with endometrial cancer.) 

Letters, 9/13

We read with interest your article in the June issue, “To reduce UTIs, one lab takes a long, wide look.”

We strongly agree that there is inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics for patients whose urine cultures are reported with organism identification and antibiotic susceptibilities but who do not have urinary tract infection. This is because many physicians send urine for culture inappropriately and then equate a positive result with infection; they believe that these laboratory tests are diagnostic for UTI.