Put It on the Board
A heads-up on hybrid lab models of genetic testing
August 2019—Little attention has been paid to the emergence and effect of hybrid laboratories—those that fall in the middle ground between the direct-to-consumer and traditional models, say the authors of an opinion piece published in the June 25 issue of JAMA. Kathryn Phillips, PhD, Julia Trosman, PhD, and Michael Douglas, MS, of the Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, say the emergence of the hybrid model, in which a clinician orders the test and returns results, “has significant implications for everyone involved in genetic testing,” providing potential benefits and risks.Greater access and convenience and lower cost for the consumer are among the potential benefits they list. Among the concerns: reduced continuity of care, profit motivation, and insufficiently extensive guidance and counseling. But there are other challenges with hybrid laboratories, they say.