Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.
Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy, CEO of mTuitive.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Tuesday, June 9, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
In this webinar, we will examine how immune recognition after allogeneic HCT can influence leukemia relapse and disease progression. The session will highlight the clinical relevance of HLA loss of heterozygosity (LOH), approaches used for its detection, and how LOH findings may support transplant strategies, including considerations for donor selection in subsequent transplantation.
Webinar presenter Alberto Cardoso Martins Lima, PhD, Clinical consulting scientist in histocompatibility,
specializing in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) at IGEN/AFIP São Paulo and CHC/UFPR in Curitiba, Brazil
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Wednesday, June 24, 2026, 12:00–1:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the expanded clinical utility of HER2 IHC scoring in metastatic breast cancer and its impact on your practice
Webinar presenter Michelle Shiller, DO, AP, CP, MGP, FACP, Baylor University Medical Center.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
February 2019—Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes, or LOINC, is a universal code system for identifying laboratory and clinical observations. LOINC provides unique numeric codes that identify the type of in vitro diagnostic test with defined attributes including component, property, time, system, scale, and method.
February 2017—In a context where the lack of drugs against resistant bacterial pathogens will continue and antimicrobial prescriptions are highly complex, effective antibiotic stewardship programs are strongly needed. In the U.S., the CDC and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services highly recommend, while the Joint Commission requires, that all hospitals and nursing care centers have antimicrobial stewardship programs, effective January 2017.
Hologic assay is first FDA-cleared test to detect M. genitalium
February 2019—The Food and Drug Administration granted clearance for Hologic’s Aptima Mycoplasma genitalium assay. This is the first test the FDA has authorized for M. genitalium detection. The FDA reviewed data from a clinical study that included testing of 11,774 samples. The FDA says the study showed that the Aptima assay correctly identified M. genitalium in approximately 90 percent of vaginal, male urethral, male urine, and penile samples. It correctly identified M. genitalium in female urine and endocervical samples 77.8 percent of the time and 81.5 percent of the time, respectively. Vaginal swabs are the preferred sample type owing to better clinical performance. Alternative sample types, such as urine, can be used if vaginal swabs are not available. In addition, the study showed that the test correctly identified samples that did not have M. genitalium present 97.8 to 99.6 percent of the time. The FDA reviewed the Aptima M. genitalium assay through the de novo premarket pathway.
Q. When performing a manual differential that contains immature cells, such as metamyelocytes and myelocytes, do you report an absolute count on all of the individual cells in the myelocytic line, or do you group them together and calculate one ANC? What about lymphocytes and reactive lymphocytes? Read answer.
Q. Why and in what employment screening settings is the two-step skin test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis recommended? Read answer.
February 2019—In last month’s column, we talked about practice engagement as an umbrella term for laboratory medical direction and practice management that builds strong relationships within and beyond the laboratory. The CAP Practice Management Committee has been taking the lead on this, but it cuts across multiple domains; the conundrum, as always, is the complexity of what we do. Practice management tools designed for other settings cannot meet our needs because we must address economy, efficiency, effectiveness, and collegiality concerns specific to pathology. But then, affinity for complexity is how we landed here in the first place, so that plays to our strengths.
February 2019—Impact of commercial laboratory testing on a care delivery system: Care delivery systems have become increasingly fragmented and complex, which impacts patient care. The amount of health care data generated has also created a problem by reducing the time devoted to direct patient care.
February 2019—Diagnostic algorithmic proposal based on IHC evaluation of invasive endocervical adenocarcinomas: The International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification was developed to separate endocervical adenocarcinomas into two main categories based on morphology: human papilloma virus-associated (HPVA) and nonhuman papilloma virus-associated adenocarcinomas.
February 2019—Evaluation of mutational processes and somatic driver mutations in cancer exomes: As next-generation sequencing-based tumor profiling gains popularity, multiple informative variables other than single-gene alterations will continue to be added to clinical reports.
February 2019—Digital pathology RFPs: from the questions to selections: To those who request the information and those who supply the information, requests for proposal, better known as RFPs, can be groanworthy. Yet laboratories planning to purchase a digital pathology system for clinical use should seriously consider going through the painstaking process, even if their institutions don’t require it, says Liron Pantanowitz, MD, vice chair of pathology informatics at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
January 2019—Ten years ago, says Manhal Izzy, MD, the approach might have seemed quixotic: performing liver transplants in patients with early intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Even today, it’s hardly standard of care. Nevertheless, it has moved well beyond the impossible dream category. Medicine advances, and practices change. There’s nothing unusual about that. But Dr. Izzy, assistant professor of medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, and transplant hepatologist, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, goes out of his way to credit the wisdom and work of those in hepatology and oncology who have been pushing forward curative approaches for cholangiocarcinoma.
