Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

2021 Issues

For genomic testing, a homegrown software solution

November 2021—At NorthShore University HealthSystem in suburban Chicago, a homegrown bioinformatics solution is the “secret sauce” that powers the health system’s personalized medicine program, says Kamalakar Gulukota, PhD, MBA, director of NorthShore’s Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology.

AMP case report: A patient with an unexpected cancer predisposition syndrome—somatic tumor mutation testing and germline mutation testing complement each other

November 2021—Molecular analysis of advanced stage tumors has become the gold standard for identifying potential targetable mutations with high sensitivity, even in limited size tissue samples. However, when only tumor tissue is sequenced, it is difficult to differentiate between somatic mutations in the tumor cells versus constitutional (germline) mutations.

Security in the cloud leads off in LIS exchange

November 2021—Cybersecurity and the cloud, COVID care gaps, and lab consolidation were among the topics CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle talked to LIS vendors and Toby Cornish, MD, PhD, about in a Sept. 20 virtual roundtable. A return to on-site trade shows, too, came up: “I do miss walking the vendor floor. I feel like I’m out of touch with what the developments are,” said Dr. Cornish of the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus.

From the President’s Desk: Keeping the truth

November 2021—In the past two years we have seen the lethal effect of a lack of trust in science. As physicians, pathologists, and fellows of the College of American Pathologists, our duty now as always is to prevent harm, the threat of which comes from mistrust and misinformation. It has always been our role to be revealers of truth, keepers of truth, and producers of clear, reliable information. Our profession and the entire CAP are based on the idea that there is a single truth that can be found through a laboratory value—a truth about a patient’s pathophysiology at a moment in time. This belief that there exist objective truths in medicine is fundamental. In fact, if the laboratory were not a reliable source of truthful information, then pathologists would have a much diminished role, if any at all, to play in clinical medicine. With the truth, pathologists are incredibly important. Without it, much less so. The founders of the CAP understood that.

Clinical pathology selected abstracts

November 2021—Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in deceased patients is important when considering safety measures for preventing infection during postmortem examinations. Rapid antigen tests are approved for testing and are widely used to mitigate the spread of the virus.

Anatomic pathology selected abstracts

November 2021—Metastasis to the thyroid gland is a rare occurrence that may pose a diagnostic challenge. The authors reported on the clinicopathological features, immunoprofile, molecular alterations, and outcomes of 30 patients with thyroid metastases who were treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2003 to 2019.

Molecular pathology selected abstracts

November 2021—The standard-of-care treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. Approximately 35 percent of patients who receive neoadjuvant treatment will achieve pathologic complete response (pCR).

Pathology informatics selected abstracts

November 2021—When the COVID-19 pandemic struck, many pathology training programs scrambled to formulate a plan to teach their pathology residents in a physically distanced learning environment. Using double- or multi-headed optical light microscopes, even with plexiglass barriers, is not ideal because they do not permit physical distancing. Many training programs leveraged digital imaging technology to continue teaching microscopy during the pandemic. Pathology departments that could not afford whole slide imaging for this purpose sometimes employed the less expensive option of dynamic virtual microscopy (DVM). A DVM platform includes a digital camera mounted to a light microscope and videoconferencing software so an educator can stream a slide image to one or more remote learners.

Newsbytes

November 2021—The following is an edited excerpt of the article “Attention-based deep multiple instance learning,” written by Jonathan Glaser, a recent graduate of the computer science and biotechnology master of science degree programs at New York University Tandon School of Engineering, in Brooklyn. The excerpt delves into how aspects of artificial intelligence can transform health care, and pathology in particular. To read the full article, go to https://tinyurl.com/AI-based-learning.

Q&A column

November 2021
Q. I am a nurse in a cardiac cath lab that performs point-of-care testing, including for activated clotting time. At my hospital, the POC testing coordinator only allows other cath lab staff, usually nurses, to use POC testing equipment if they have a copy of their diploma. Can staff who have proof of licensure (such as from the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists) but do not have a copy of their diploma be authorized to use POC testing equipment? Read answer.

Q. I recently joined a hospital laboratory that verifies reagents lot to lot with patient samples using a percentage difference of 10 for all parameters. The hospital lab where I previously worked used a CLIA allowable-error percentage. Is 10 percent allowable error acceptable for reagent lot-to-lot verification for all parameters? Read answer.