Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.
Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications.
Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.
Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.
Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.
Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy, CEO of mTuitive.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
August 2024—The CAP has been expanding its international footprint in recent years, and I hope to accelerate that trend during my presidency. The reason is simple: The CAP has established the world standard in quality for clinical laboratories, and it is our responsibility to share that standard as broadly as we can to improve care for patients everywhere in the world.
August 2024—Social media, including websites and platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter), are a dominant way to consume news and entertainment and have significant societal impact. Social media use in medicine, including pathology, is widespread and has been associated with numerous benefits. The medical industry generally has encouraged the professional use of social media, despite its potential harm. The approaches of various medical disciplines to social media have included support for early adoption, publication of how-to guides, enthusiastic backing by professional organizations, and formulation of guidelines to temper usage. The authors conducted a study to identify motivating forces and premises that underpin physicians’ adoption of social media for professional uses.
August 2024—Emerging data suggest a correlation between T1 bladder cancer subcategorization, or substaging, and oncological outcomes. The International Society of Urological Pathology held a 2022 consensus conference on issues in bladder cancer, in Basel, Switzerland, in which it tasked a working group with making recommendations for T1 subcategorization of transurethral bladder resections. To this end, the ISUP developed and circulated a survey to its membership querying approaches for subcategorizing T1 bladder cancer. The survey focused on clinical relevance, pathological reporting, and endorsement of T1 subcategorization in the daily practice of pathology. Approximately 40 percent of respondents to the pre-meeting survey indicated that they do not routinely report the T1 subcategory.
August 2024—Alzheimer disease is genetically intricate and involves rare and common genetic variants. Early-onset autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD) is caused by mutations in the APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 genes, while variants in numerous other genes contribute to the risk of developing late-onset Alzheimer disease, with APOE considered the most significant risk factor. APOE4 homozygotes face a lifetime risk of Alzheimer disease dementia of up to 60 percent by age 85, significantly higher than that of heterozygotes or noncarriers of the gene. The predictability of outcomes in APOE4 homozygotes has not been previously studied, limiting the application of statistical methods used in ADAD for APOE4 research. The predictable sequence of pathological, biomarker, and clinical changes in ADAD and Down syndrome has offered insights into Alzheimer disease pathophysiology.
August 2024
Q. I have been tasked with doing a quality assurance review comparing automated differential results to the manual differential done on the same patient. Do you have recommendations regarding acceptable analytical criteria? Read answer.
Q. Can activated clotting time results handwritten by a perfusionist be sent to the laboratory to be entered into the laboratory information system? Read answer.
August 2024—Aravindhan Sriharan, MD, is a supporter of digital pathology, but when it comes to assessing images, he prefers the feel and speed of a microscope. And his conversations with colleagues indicate many of them do too. “If I’m scrolling around a digital image, I can’t get the kind of speed, accuracy, and dexterity that I can on a physical microscope,” says Dr. Sriharan, dermatopathologist at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center and assistant professor of pathology and laboratory medicine at Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine.
August 2024—The Association for Molecular Pathology published in July a joint consensus recommendation on DPYD genotyping. The intent is to provide guidance to clinical laboratories and assay manufacturers that develop, validate, and/or offer clinical DPYD pharmacogenomic testing. “Testing for variants in the DPYD gene can help identify individuals who may be at increased risk for severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity,” Victoria Pratt, PhD, co-chair of the AMP PGx working group and director of scientific affairs for pharmacogenetics at Agena Bioscience, said in a July 22 statement announcing the publication.
August 2024—In a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court of the United States overruled the longstanding Chevron doctrine, a judicial precedent that has been foundational to administrative law and regulatory practice for four decades. This decision has profound implications for regulations promulgated by the hundreds of federal agencies. For laboratory professionals, understanding this decision will be valuable in understanding how the landscape will change.
July 2024—Like a long-awaited second act, the FDA’s final rule regulating laboratory-developed tests as medical devices took the stage this spring. As with any FDA performance, this one opened to mixed reviews.
The spring curtain-raising followed the earlier proposed rule from last October, which drew some 6,500 responses during the public comment period. If that was an out-of-town tryout, no one quite knew what to expect from the rewrite, or if there would even be one.
As it turns out, there were indeed changes, but they didn’t necessarily bring clarity. As Jane Pine Wood, counsel for McDonald Hopkins, puts it, the final rule “certainly raised a whole lot more questions than it answered.”
The rule calls for a four-year, five-stage phaseout policy with the FDA enacting greater oversight of in vitro diagnostic products that are offered as LDTs.
Stage one, beginning on May 6, 2025, calls for labs to comply with medical device reporting requirements, correction and removal reporting requirements, and quality system requirements regarding complaint files.
July 2024—With the Food and Drug Administration approval in May of two HPV self-collection devices for use in clinic settings, physicians in and out of the laboratory are optimistic the approach can reach underscreened patients, even if FDA approval is only a first step.
