Tuesday, October 20, 2026, 11 AM-12 PM ET
Hear experts review the biological and clinical significance of the HER2 expression continuum in breast tissue, providing a clearer understanding of how these variations might impact diagnosis, and discuss the emerging importance of documenting HER2-low and HER2-ultralow categories using a validated IHC assay.
Webinar presenters Keith Wharton, MD, PhD, Global Medical Affairs Leader–Pathology, Roche Diagnostics Solutions, and Hannah Y. Wen, MD, PhD, Director, Breast Pathology Fellowship, Associate Team Leader, Breast Pathology Team, Attending Pathologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Roche.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Thursday, October 29, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the evolving role of PD-L1 testing in HNSCC and ovarian cancer.
Webinar presenter Georgios Deftereos, MD, Professor of Pathology, Associate Director of the Clinical Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Director of Molecular Cytopathology, University of California, San Francisco
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Agilent.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Tuesday, November 3, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the challenges of detecting NRG1 fusions and how RNA-based testing can support more comprehensive fusion identification in clinical practice.
Webinar presenter Benjamin Weinberg, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine and Attending Physician
specializing in gastrointestinal medical oncology
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Diaceutics.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Monday, November 16, 2026, 12:30 PM-2 PM ET
Hear experts discuss a multidisciplinary approach to oncopathology for HER2
assessments for solid tumors in the absence of a companion diagnostic.
Webinar presenters Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD, Chair, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Medical Director, Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Emina E. Torlakovic, MD, PhD, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, and Carol Cheung, MD, PhD, JD, FRCPC, Deputy Director, Canadian Biomarker Quality, Assurance—Programme canadien d’assurance de la qualité des biomarqueurs
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
August 2024—The CAP has been expanding its international footprint in recent years, and I hope to accelerate that trend during my presidency. The reason is simple: The CAP has established the world standard in quality for clinical laboratories, and it is our responsibility to share that standard as broadly as we can to improve care for patients everywhere in the world.
August 2024—Social media, including websites and platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter), are a dominant way to consume news and entertainment and have significant societal impact. Social media use in medicine, including pathology, is widespread and has been associated with numerous benefits. The medical industry generally has encouraged the professional use of social media, despite its potential harm. The approaches of various medical disciplines to social media have included support for early adoption, publication of how-to guides, enthusiastic backing by professional organizations, and formulation of guidelines to temper usage. The authors conducted a study to identify motivating forces and premises that underpin physicians’ adoption of social media for professional uses.
August 2024—Emerging data suggest a correlation between T1 bladder cancer subcategorization, or substaging, and oncological outcomes. The International Society of Urological Pathology held a 2022 consensus conference on issues in bladder cancer, in Basel, Switzerland, in which it tasked a working group with making recommendations for T1 subcategorization of transurethral bladder resections. To this end, the ISUP developed and circulated a survey to its membership querying approaches for subcategorizing T1 bladder cancer. The survey focused on clinical relevance, pathological reporting, and endorsement of T1 subcategorization in the daily practice of pathology. Approximately 40 percent of respondents to the pre-meeting survey indicated that they do not routinely report the T1 subcategory.
August 2024—Alzheimer disease is genetically intricate and involves rare and common genetic variants. Early-onset autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD) is caused by mutations in the APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 genes, while variants in numerous other genes contribute to the risk of developing late-onset Alzheimer disease, with APOE considered the most significant risk factor. APOE4 homozygotes face a lifetime risk of Alzheimer disease dementia of up to 60 percent by age 85, significantly higher than that of heterozygotes or noncarriers of the gene. The predictability of outcomes in APOE4 homozygotes has not been previously studied, limiting the application of statistical methods used in ADAD for APOE4 research. The predictable sequence of pathological, biomarker, and clinical changes in ADAD and Down syndrome has offered insights into Alzheimer disease pathophysiology.
August 2024
Q. I have been tasked with doing a quality assurance review comparing automated differential results to the manual differential done on the same patient. Do you have recommendations regarding acceptable analytical criteria? Read answer.
Q. Can activated clotting time results handwritten by a perfusionist be sent to the laboratory to be entered into the laboratory information system? Read answer.
August 2024—Aravindhan Sriharan, MD, is a supporter of digital pathology, but when it comes to assessing images, he prefers the feel and speed of a microscope. And his conversations with colleagues indicate many of them do too. “If I’m scrolling around a digital image, I can’t get the kind of speed, accuracy, and dexterity that I can on a physical microscope,” says Dr. Sriharan, dermatopathologist at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center and assistant professor of pathology and laboratory medicine at Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine.
August 2024—The Association for Molecular Pathology published in July a joint consensus recommendation on DPYD genotyping. The intent is to provide guidance to clinical laboratories and assay manufacturers that develop, validate, and/or offer clinical DPYD pharmacogenomic testing. “Testing for variants in the DPYD gene can help identify individuals who may be at increased risk for severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity,” Victoria Pratt, PhD, co-chair of the AMP PGx working group and director of scientific affairs for pharmacogenetics at Agena Bioscience, said in a July 22 statement announcing the publication.
August 2024—In a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court of the United States overruled the longstanding Chevron doctrine, a judicial precedent that has been foundational to administrative law and regulatory practice for four decades. This decision has profound implications for regulations promulgated by the hundreds of federal agencies. For laboratory professionals, understanding this decision will be valuable in understanding how the landscape will change.
July 2024—Like a long-awaited second act, the FDA’s final rule regulating laboratory-developed tests as medical devices took the stage this spring. As with any FDA performance, this one opened to mixed reviews.
The spring curtain-raising followed the earlier proposed rule from last October, which drew some 6,500 responses during the public comment period. If that was an out-of-town tryout, no one quite knew what to expect from the rewrite, or if there would even be one.
As it turns out, there were indeed changes, but they didn’t necessarily bring clarity. As Jane Pine Wood, counsel for McDonald Hopkins, puts it, the final rule “certainly raised a whole lot more questions than it answered.”
The rule calls for a four-year, five-stage phaseout policy with the FDA enacting greater oversight of in vitro diagnostic products that are offered as LDTs.
Stage one, beginning on May 6, 2025, calls for labs to comply with medical device reporting requirements, correction and removal reporting requirements, and quality system requirements regarding complaint files.
July 2024—With the Food and Drug Administration approval in May of two HPV self-collection devices for use in clinic settings, physicians in and out of the laboratory are optimistic the approach can reach underscreened patients, even if FDA approval is only a first step.
