Tuesday, October 20, 2026, 11 AM-12 PM ET
Hear experts review the biological and clinical significance of the HER2 expression continuum in breast tissue, providing a clearer understanding of how these variations might impact diagnosis, and discuss the emerging importance of documenting HER2-low and HER2-ultralow categories using a validated IHC assay.
Webinar presenters Keith Wharton, MD, PhD, Global Medical Affairs Leader–Pathology, Roche Diagnostics Solutions, and Hannah Y. Wen, MD, PhD, Director, Breast Pathology Fellowship, Associate Team Leader, Breast Pathology Team, Attending Pathologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Roche.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Thursday, October 29, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the evolving role of PD-L1 testing in HNSCC and ovarian cancer.
Webinar presenter Georgios Deftereos, MD, Professor of Pathology, Associate Director of the Clinical Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Director of Molecular Cytopathology, University of California, San Francisco
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Agilent.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Tuesday, November 3, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the challenges of detecting NRG1 fusions and how RNA-based testing can support more comprehensive fusion identification in clinical practice.
Webinar presenter Benjamin Weinberg, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine and Attending Physician
specializing in gastrointestinal medical oncology
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Diaceutics.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Monday, November 16, 2026, 12:30 PM-2 PM ET
Hear experts discuss a multidisciplinary approach to oncopathology for HER2
assessments for solid tumors in the absence of a companion diagnostic.
Webinar presenters Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD, Chair, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Medical Director, Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Emina E. Torlakovic, MD, PhD, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, and Carol Cheung, MD, PhD, JD, FRCPC, Deputy Director, Canadian Biomarker Quality, Assurance—Programme canadien d’assurance de la qualité des biomarqueurs
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
January 2024—Urinary cytology is widely used to screen for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) and to monitor for recurrence. Several reporting systems have been proposed over the past few decades, but The Paris System (TPS) for Reporting Urinary Cytology is the most widely applied worldwide.
January 2024—Viscoelastic assays and other coagulation tests were front and center when CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle on Nov. 20 convened seven people in an online roundtable. Oksana Volod, MD, and Eric Salazar, MD, PhD, and five company representatives weighed in on, among other things, appropriate test use, automation, and laboratory-developed tests. What they said begins here.
January 2024—I was planning to write about a much more pleasant topic this month, but instead I’ll use this column to address something that’s gnawing at all of us now: the prospect of FDA regulation of laboratory-developed tests.
January 2024—People respond differently to SARS-CoV-2 infection, with some having a very severe clinical course and sequelae while others recover quickly. Several research studies have used laboratory data to identify patient populations most at risk for severe outcome from COVID-19. However, many of these studies were conducted in China and did not represent the demographics of the U.S. population. Among the drawbacks of these studies were that most analyzed variance between two patient groups, yet statistical differences don’t always correlate with clinically useful predictions. Furthermore, these studies used data from throughout patients’ disease course, and clinicians would like to identify patients at risk during their initial interaction.
January 2024—Diffuse parenchymal lung disease is a well-recognized complication of systemic connective tissue disease but rarely arises in patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis, which are poorly understood. Therefore, the authors conducted a study to characterize diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD) associated with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis, with or without prior immunomodulation. Their pathology consultation files were searched for patients having psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis and DPLD. After excluding cases with active infection or smoking-related DPLD only, 44 patients (22 of whom were women; median age, 60 years; range, 23–81 years) were enrolled in the study. Clinical history and pathology slides were reviewed.
January 2024—DDX41 is involved in multiple cellular processes, including RNA metabolism and splicing. Inherited variants have been linked to an increased risk of the blood neoplasms myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
January 2024
Q. Can a person who has a bachelor of science degree in health care administration sign off on competency assessments? Read answer.
Q. Our laboratory uses a total protein assay from Beckman Coulter that has an analytical measurement range of 3–12 g/dL for serum determinations. The assay sensitivity states 1 g/dL of total protein. Can we loop sensitivity into our AMR and make our reporting range 1–12 g/dL? Will this make our assay a laboratory-developed test? Quite often our clinicians need assays reported to 1 g/dL, since they need to calculate the ratio of total protein serum to body fluid as per Light’s criteria. If we report to 1 g/dL, we have to loop sensitivity into our AMR. Read answer.
January 2024—When the medical microbiology laboratory at Yale-New Haven Hospital makes operational changes, it uses data analytics to monitor their impact. Yet the process of implementing laboratory analytics can be challenging.
January 2024—The Association for Molecular Pathology on Dec. 14 published a joint report on what to consider for a slice testing strategy for diagnostics, including gene selection, analytic performance, coverage, quality, and interpretation. Slice testing is the practice of bioinformatically selecting a subset of genes from exome or genome sequencing assays.
December 2023—The recent CAP proficiency testing questionnaire was meant to be the coup de grâce. Hematology PT participants were asked about their band neutrophil reporting practices and, given that these manually generated counts were supposedly on their way out decades ago, the authors of the survey questionnaire expected to see very little activity. The survey, they hoped, would be a way to pound the final, data-driven nail in the coffin. Or, as lead author Maria (Ria) Vergara-Lluri, MD, puts it, “We thought this had all been laid to rest 30 years ago.” It wasn’t. Says Dr. Vergara-Lluri: “Surprise: 86 percent of labs that participated still report bands.” The results of the survey upended many of the assumptions, if not hopes, the authors might have had. Among laboratories that reported manual differentials, they found that most reported bands (4,554 of 5,268). Moreover, only 73 percent reported band reference ranges. On the morphologic challenge, bands classified as “easy” were indeed easy—participants classified them well.
