Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, November 3, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the challenges of detecting NRG1 fusions and how RNA-based testing can support more comprehensive fusion identification in clinical practice.

Webinar presenter Benjamin Weinberg, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine and Attending Physician
specializing in gastrointestinal medical oncology

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Diaceutics.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Tuesday, November 10, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Join us for a session to help improve diagnostic accuracy in your practice when scoring HER2 IHC 0 with faint, incomplete membrane staining in ≤10% of tumor cells vs IHC 0 with no membrane staining detected in patients with mBC.

Webinar presenter Jeffrey Gregg, MD, University of Nevada

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Monday, November 16, 2026, 12:30 PM-2 PM ET
Hear experts discuss a multidisciplinary approach to oncopathology for HER2
assessments for solid tumors in the absence of a companion diagnostic.

Webinar presenters Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD, Chair, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Medical Director, Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Emina E. Torlakovic, MD, PhD, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, and Carol Cheung, MD, PhD, JD, FRCPC, Deputy Director, Canadian Biomarker Quality, Assurance—Programme canadien d’assurance de la qualité des biomarqueurs

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Wednesday, December 9, 2026, 12 PM-1 PM ET
Hear an expert pathologist discuss the role of HER2 IHC testing and scoring in solid tumors including endometrial, ovarian, cervical, bladder, non-small cell lung, colorectal, and biliary cancers

Webinar presenter Michelle Shiller, DO, MSPT, Baylor Sammons Cancer Center; Fulgent Genetics; Texas Cancer Interception Institute

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is intended for US healthcare professionals. This program is being sponsored by AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

Manage Subscription

To receive CAP TODAY magazine, please subscribe here.
For change of address, mail new information to: CAP TODAY Circulation, 325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, IL 60093-2750 or visit here.

Columns

Put It on the Board

Better cancer diagnostics at core of Future of Pathology report
June 2020—Leica Biosystems launched in April The Future of Pathology Expert Report written by an international panel of pathologists in consultation with health care executives, cancer stakeholders, and pathology leaders. In the report, each member of the panel—Tiffany Graham, MD, and Jerad Gardner, MD, in the U.S., and Bethany Williams, MBBS, PhD, and Matthew Clarke, MBBS, in the U.K.—addresses one of four subjects: pathology education, digital pathology and artificial intelligence, improving perceptions of pathology, and molecular pathology. The theme of the report (available at www.thefutureofpathology.com) is improving and transforming cancer diagnostics.

Put it on the Board

Clinical research registry aims to answer crucial COVID-19 questions May 2020—A Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes Registry was launched April 13 to unite health care workers in the U.S. for rapid-cycle research. The goals of the so-called HERO registry are to engage workers in a research community, understand their experiences, and track outcomes associated with caring for patients with COVID-19. The HERO research program, led by Duke Clinical Research Institute, part of Duke University School of Medicine, leverages the

From the President’s Desk: Heroes in the COVID-19 pandemic

May 2020—The most pressing topic in pathology today is the COVID-19 pandemic. Because this column must be written a few weeks before it is printed and delivered to readers, anything I write in April will be out of date by the time you see it. Numbers will be wrong, and comments on testing methodology will be obsolete. Instead, I’ll focus on the bigger picture. As we watch the world’s response to the pandemic, I am proud to be a physician and a pathologist. I am honored to work with phenomenal laboratory personnel, and this is by no means unique to me. Across the medical community, we have seen people come together for a shared mission in ways we have never experienced before. The demands on our laboratories are tremendous, and we are rising to the challenges of producing tests and directing therapies under conditions we have not seen before.

Newsbytes

May 2020—Imagine the potential educational benefits of pathology residents being able to see the precise path that the eyes of experienced pathologists take as they scan a whole slide image. Preliminary research has suggested that showing residents visual representations of a pathologist’s eye-tracking movement overlaid over a whole slide image can impact how they learn, says Sharon E. Fox, MD, PhD, a pathologist at the Southeast Louisiana Veterans Healthcare System and associate director of research and development, Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center.

Clinical Pathology Selected Abstracts

May 2020—Laboratory costs represent approximately three to four percent of overall health care expenses but drive 70 to 80 percent of decisions made by physicians. One way to control laboratory testing expenditures is through appropriate utilization. For example, thyroid and antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing have reliable initial screening tests, yet specialized testing is overutilized for both. In 2000 guidelines, the College of American Pathologists and American College of Rheumatology established that the ANA screen by immunofluorescence in the setting of a negative result is sufficiently sensitive not to perform further testing with subserologies and that thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is a sensitive marker of thyroid function and can often be used without further testing with a normal TSH.

Q&A column

Q. Can you provide a current reference for the various modifications of transfused red blood cells — for example, irradiation and white cell depletion — and their indications? Read answer.
Q. In the context of allowable error relative to the immature platelet fraction test, is the analytical measurement range applicable to the IPF?
Read answer.
Q. What is the normal random plasma glucose value? Read answer.

Anatomic Pathology Selected Abstracts

May 2020—Flat epithelial atypia is an alteration of terminal duct lobular units by a proliferation of ductal epithelium with low-grade atypia. No consensus exists regarding whether the diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia in core needle biopsy necessitates excision. The authors retrospectively identified all in-house core needle biopsies with flat epithelial atypia obtained at their institution between January 2012 and July 2018. They reviewed all core needle biopsy slides and assessed radiologic-pathologic concordance. An upgrade was defined as invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ in the excision, or both. The excision slides of all upgraded cases were re-reviewed.

Molecular Pathology Selected Abstracts

May 2020—Each year a growing number of novel viruses are discovered in the wild animal kingdom with the use of next-generation sequencing technology. However, the current method of functionally assessing the zoonotic potential—that is, the potential to be transmitted to humans—of novel viruses involves synthesis of viral genomes (tens of thousands of bases) and reverse genetic engineering to produce a recombinant virus. This is expensive and time-consuming, and it is not practical due to the scale of new viral strains being discovered. To overcome this hurdle, Letko, et al., developed a rapid and cost-effective method that could functionally assess a number of related viruses for zoonotic potential. The essential component of viral cross-species transmission is cell entry, which is a multi-step process involving attachment of the virus to the host cell surface, receptor engagement, processing of host proteases, and downstream membrane fusion.

Q&A column

Q. For the population with diabetes, what can the clinical laboratory do to promote evidence-based testing and monitoring for chronic kidney disease? Read answer.
Q. What are the proficiency testing enrollment requirements if an analyte is tested in multiple locations within the laboratory? Read answer.
Q. With regard to specimens from oncology patients exhibiting hyperleukocytosis, the Beckman Coulter DxH 800 analyzer used by our laboratory autocorrects the RBCs, but the lab is still seeing errors on the indices (hemoglobin, MCV). What is the best way to correct for potential WBC interference on the RBC indices? Read answer.

Put It on the Board

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics in February made available its Vitros XT 3400 Chemistry System.

April 2020—Ortho Clinical Diagnostics in February made available its Vitros XT 3400 Chemistry System. The new system, like the Vitros XT 7600 Integrated System, simultaneously performs two tests frequently ordered together on one Vitros XT MicroSlide. Double assay processing offers a 25 percent faster turnaround time on a common panel of assays, Ortho said in its Feb. 26 statement, with an average processing time of 7.5 minutes. The XT MicroSlide allows for a sample volume of 2.7 μL.