Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, November 10, 2026, 1:00 PM-2 PM ET
Join us for a session to help improve diagnostic accuracy in your practice when scoring HER2 IHC 0 with faint, incomplete membrane staining in ≤10% of tumor cells vs IHC 0 with no membrane staining detected in patients with mBC.

Webinar presenter Samuel Caughron, MD, FCAP, Chief Strategy Officer, MAWD Pathology, Medical Director of Laboratory, AdventHealth Kansas City, Medical Director of Laboratory, Labcorp, President, Member & Director, Pathology Ventures, LLC

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is intended for US healthcare professionals. This program is being sponsored by AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Monday, November 16, 2026, 12:30 PM-2 PM ET
Hear experts discuss a multidisciplinary approach to oncopathology for HER2
assessments for solid tumors in the absence of a companion diagnostic.

Webinar presenters Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD, Chair, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Medical Director, Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Emina E. Torlakovic, MD, PhD, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, and Carol Cheung, MD, PhD, JD, FRCPC, Deputy Director, Canadian Biomarker Quality, Assurance—Programme canadien d’assurance de la qualité des biomarqueurs

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Wednesday, November 18, 2026, 12:00 PM-1 PM ET
Join leading pathology experts, Savitri Krishnamurthy, MD, and Marilyn Bui, MD, PhD, for a webinar exploring potential challenges in HER2 IHC testing for breast cancer, emerging evidence supporting digital and computational pathology as assistive tools for pathologists in HER2 IHC assessment, and practical considerations for real-world implementation and adoption.

Webinar presenters Savitri Krishnamurthy, MD, Professor of Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Marilyn Bui, MD, PhD, Surgical Pathologist and Cytopathologist Member and Professor, Departments of Pathology, Machine Learning, and Translational Pathology, Scientific Director, Analytic Microscopy Core Chair, Women in Oncology Executive Board Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speakers are being compensated for their presentations. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME credit.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Wednesday, December 9, 2026, 12 PM-1 PM ET
Hear an expert pathologist discuss the role of HER2 IHC testing and scoring in solid tumors including endometrial, ovarian, cervical, bladder, non-small cell lung, colorectal, and biliary cancers

Webinar presenter Michelle Shiller, DO, MSPT, Baylor Sammons Cancer Center; Fulgent Genetics; Texas Cancer Interception Institute

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is intended for US healthcare professionals. This program is being sponsored by AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

Manage Subscription

To receive CAP TODAY magazine, please subscribe here.
For change of address, mail new information to: CAP TODAY Circulation, 325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, IL 60093-2750 or visit here.

Columns

Put It on the Board, 2/16

February 2016—FDA open to whole-slide imaging as class II device: The Digital Pathology Association says that manufacturers interested in marketing whole-slide imaging devices for primary diagnosis in the U.S. should submit de novo applications to the Food and Drug Administration.

Put It on the Board, 1/16

January 2016—2016 may be year of action on laboratory-developed tests: During a session at the Association for Molecular Pathology’s annual meeting in November, Rep. Michael Burgess, MD (R-Tex.), said he expects the Food and Drug Administration to issue its long-awaited final guidance on laboratory-developed tests during the first quarter of 2016.

From the President’s Desk: Flexibility matters, 1/16

January 2016—Pathology is becoming more vital, complex, variable, integrated, and interactive. Once upon a time, we trained to enter practice. Today, we must train to be continually trained. Our ability to stay current with science and explain its potential is a critical variable in the quality of care our patients receive. As a department chair and laboratory medical director, I encourage each member of our group to embrace a coordinated approach.

Molecular Pathology Selected Abstracts, 1/16

January 2016—Genomic sequencing of tumors can be used clinically to identify acquired somatic mutations in cancer-related genes. In an era of personalized medicine, tumor-specific mutational status can be used to acquire prognostic information and guide molecular targeted therapies. However, many patients also have germline variants in these genes, which not only can make it difficult to identify the tumor-specific somatic mutations, but may also affect the biological mechanism of tumorigenesis.

Newsbytes, 1/16

January 2015—As the trend in cloud computing continues, in part as a way to reduce capital investment costs, laboratory decision-makers must learn the nuances of how to vet this type of vendor and negotiate software-as-a-service agreements. Without this knowledge, they risk entering into a less-than-satisfactory contractual arrangement that can cost them money, industry experts say.

Anatomic Pathology Abstracts, 1/16

January 2016—Uterine leiomyosarcomas are rare malignant tumors with a poor prognosis, while leiomyomas are common benign tumors unrelated to their malignant counterparts. Diagnostic features commonly present in leiomyosarcoma include cytologic atypia, high mitotic index, and a sarcoma-specific geographic cell death designated as tumor cell necrosis (TCN).

Q&A column, 1/16

January 2016—The current recommendation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to screen baby boomers for hepatitis C virus may cause stress on laboratory resources. Is this the most prudent way to capture those individuals who will progress to liver cancer? Current data/literature suggest that 80 percent of those who may screen positive will not progress to cancer but will eliminate the virus on their own.

Clinical pathology selected abstracts

January 2016—A logical delta check for identifying erroneous blood cell count results: Regulations require that hospitals have a quality management plan that benchmarks key indicators of quality performance. One such indicator is a delta check, which is a broad quality control for preanalytic and analytic errors that identifies significant variation in a patient’s present lab result when compared with the patient’s previous result for the same test.

Put In on the Board

December 2015—Despite launching years after the next-generation sequencing systems from Illumina and Thermo Fisher, officials at the German molecular biology company Qiagen see an opening for their GeneReader NGS offering.

Clinical pathology selected abstracts

December 2015—Optimizing transfusion ratios in massive transfusion protocols: The 1:1:1 ratio of packed red blood cells to plasma to platelet use for massive transfusion emerged out of data on mortality in military personnel wounded in combat. Many studies have investigated the optimal ratio for use in massive transfusion. The literature is controversial, and studies continue to support and refute the 1:1:1 ratio.