Linkedin Youtube
Launch Digital Edition

Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Wednesday, September 23, 2026. 12 PM-1 PM ET
Roundtable presenters Dr. David Sacks MB, ChB, FRCPath, Chairman, Steering Committee National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP), and Priya Sivaraman, PhD, Senior Technical Product Manager, Tosoh Bioscience

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Thursday, September 24, 2026 11 AM-12 PM CT
This session explores the evolving role of RAS in precision oncology, from the biology of RAS mutations to the expanding landscape of targeted therapies. Through expert presentations, real-world case discussions, and interactive audience polling, participants will examine best practices for RAS biomarker testing across solid tumors, including lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. The session will highlight practical considerations for tissue and liquid biopsy, strategies to address testing gaps, and the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration to ensure timely identification of patients who may benefit from RAS-targeted therapies.

Webinar presenters David Braxton, MD, Chief of Molecular Pathology Services, Hoag Family Cancer Institute & Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, and Carlos Becerra, MD, Research Director for Medical Oncology, Margaret Given Larkin Endowed Chair for Developmental Cancer Therapeutics, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Wednesday, September 30, 2026. 1 PM-1:30 PM ET
Roundtable presenters John Longshore, PhD, Head of Scientific Affairs, Global Oncology Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, and Flora Berisha, MS, Executive Director, Global Head of Diagnostic Partnering and Development, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, and Mark D. Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations, Diagnostic Molecular Pathology, Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Isabel Preeshagul, DO, MBS, Thoracic Medical Oncologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Thursday, October 1, 2026 1 PM-2 PM ET
This presentation will explore the value of in-house CGP, offer insights into the benefits and drawbacks of incorporation, and provide information about important practical factors when considering in-house implementation of CGP.

Webinar presenter Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, MD, PhD, FCAP, Medical Director, Molecular Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine Laboratory, Director, Division of Diagnostic Molecular Pathology and Human Genetics, Henry F. Krous Professor of Pathology, University of Nebraska Medical Center

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Tuesday, October 20, 2026 11 AM-12 PM ET
Hear experts review the biological and clinical significance of the HER2 expression continuum in breast tissue, providing a clearer understanding of how these variations might impact diagnosis, and discuss the emerging importance of documenting HER2-low and HER2-ultralow categories using a validated IHC assay.

Webinar presenters Keith Wharton, MD, PhD, Global Medical Affairs Leader–Pathology, Roche Diagnostics Solutions, and Hannah Y. Wen, MD, PhD, Director, Breast Pathology Fellowship, Associate Team Leader, Breast Pathology Team, Attending Pathologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

ARTICLES

Letters, 9/13

We read with interest your article in the June issue, “To reduce UTIs, one lab takes a long, wide look.”

We strongly agree that there is inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics for patients whose urine cultures are reported with organism identification and antibiotic susceptibilities but who do not have urinary tract infection. This is because many physicians send urine for culture inappropriately and then equate a positive result with infection; they believe that these laboratory tests are diagnostic for UTI.

A pathologist’s observations about in-office AP labs

September 2013—With the GAO reporting that self-referral of anatomic pathology and other services costs Medicare millions, and with legislation introduced Aug. 1 that would prohibit such self-referrals, physician groups are fighting back, arguing that the exemptions allow for more integrated care. Not so, says pathologist Matthew Foster, MD, who shared what he’s observed about in-office AP labs in an Aug. 8 CAP online panel discussion. He is with Pathology Consultants of Central Virginia, an independent lab that provides services to Centra Health, a nonprofit hospital system serving a community of about 350,000. He is also associate medical director of the Alan B. Pearson Regional Cancer Center in Lynchburg. Dr. Foster’s edited remarks follow.

MOC:PQRS incentive: what it is, how to earn it

September 2013—The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has approved the American Board of Pathology for participation in the MOC:PQRS Additional Incentive Program. This approval allows ABP diplomates who are participating successfully in the PQRS incentive program to earn an additional 0.5 percent incentive payment on the total Medicare part B allowed charges for participating in MOC:PQRS in 2013.

Challenge and change in blood bank systems marketplace

September 2013—From future innovations to tighter regulations, seven users and marketers of blood bank software shared their perspectives on the blood bank systems marketplace with CAP TODAY. Here and on the following pages is what they told us. Beginning on page 20 is the 2013 guide to blood bank information systems.

Risk, compliance, pay—a juggling act for labs

August 2013—Theatergoers don’t want to see theunderstudy. Passengers don’t want to encounter a series of “flight delayed” messages on the departures board. And while it may not be every laboratory’s worst nightmare, no pathologist wants to open a letter from a government agency or payer that starts out, “It has come to our attention,” followed with words like “violation” and “false claim.”

For labs, opportunity knocks as wallets close

August 2013—Robert L. Michel doesn’t claim to have all the answers to all the problems laboratory medicine now faces. But as editor-in-chief of The Dark Report, the industry intelligence publication, he knows what those problems are chapter and verse. He also sees where future problems lie.

Toolkit lets labs make the case for the right LIS

August 2013—In ancient Rome, the legions might gird for combat with a muscled cuirass, helmet, and greaves, and carry a pilum. But none of them ever had to confront a hospital system C-suite, with high-level executives whose titles start with “chief” deciding between a single, enterprisewide information system or a “best-of-breed” laboratory information system.

AMP case report: A 48-year-old woman with endometrial cancer. Importance of screening for Lynch syndrome in patients with EC

August 2013—Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant syndrome that predisposes patients to multiple malignancies. LS has traditionally been thought of as a colorectal-cancer-dominated syndrome; however, the incidence of endometrial cancer in women with LS actually exceeds that of colorectal cancer. Here we report a case of a woman with metachronous colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer, with the goal of increasing awareness of the need to screen endometrial cancer patients for LS. Identifying these patients is important not only for the patient but also for other family members who would benefit from genetic counseling and surveillance for LS-associated malignancies.

Checklists 2013: newborn screening and MALDI-TOF

August 2013—At CAP ’11, then president-elect Stanley Robboy, MD, sat at a table in a conference room. He didn’t know those seated with him but he and they started to chat. The conversation turned to Dr. Robboy’s goals for his upcoming presidential term, and a member from Saudi Arabia, Amal Saadallah, MD, PhD, proposed that newborn screening requirements be created for accreditation.

Cytopathology and More | Cytologic-histologic correlation: And the answer is…

August 2013—You have a great gynecologic cytology case, a patient with atypical endometrial cells on Pap test that you believe might represent a low-grade endometrial adenocarcinoma, but it has been four weeks and you have had no feedback about the patient’s outcome. It seems as if there have been a lot of atypical endometrial cells on Pap tests lately. Could it be due to the implementation of a new liquid-based technology for Pap tests in your laboratory? Fortunately, your laboratory performs cytologic-histologic correlation monthly, so you ask the medical director if she has noticed any trends in the rate of atypical glandular cells, and what the corresponding biopsies have shown. To your relief, the patient had a biopsy showing low-grade endometrial carcinoma, and the laboratory statistics have shown only a slight increase in atypical glandular cells since the new technology was implemented. The medical director informs you that she has been recording these data as a special QA project to determine if the increase is due to over-interpretation of reactive glandular cells, because the technology enhances nuclear and cytologic details of glandular cells.

MARKETPLACE

TRENDING