Webinars and Commercial Conversations — Register Now

Tuesday, November 10, 2026, 1:00 PM-2 PM ET
Join us for a session to help improve diagnostic accuracy in your practice when scoring HER2 IHC 0 with faint, incomplete membrane staining in ≤10% of tumor cells vs IHC 0 with no membrane staining detected in patients with mBC.

Webinar presenter Samuel Caughron, MD, FCAP, Chief Strategy Officer, MAWD Pathology, Medical Director of Laboratory, AdventHealth Kansas City, Medical Director of Laboratory, Labcorp, President, Member & Director, Pathology Ventures, LLC

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is intended for US healthcare professionals. This program is being sponsored by AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Monday, November 16, 2026, 12:30 PM-2 PM ET
Hear experts discuss a multidisciplinary approach to oncopathology for HER2
assessments for solid tumors in the absence of a companion diagnostic.

Webinar presenters Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD, Chair, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Medical Director, Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Emina E. Torlakovic, MD, PhD, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, and Carol Cheung, MD, PhD, JD, FRCPC, Deputy Director, Canadian Biomarker Quality, Assurance—Programme canadien d’assurance de la qualité des biomarqueurs

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Wednesday, November 18, 2026, 12:00 PM-1 PM ET
Join leading pathology experts, Savitri Krishnamurthy, MD, and Marilyn Bui, MD, PhD, for a webinar exploring potential challenges in HER2 IHC testing for breast cancer, emerging evidence supporting digital and computational pathology as assistive tools for pathologists in HER2 IHC assessment, and practical considerations for real-world implementation and adoption.

Webinar presenters Savitri Krishnamurthy, MD, Professor of Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Marilyn Bui, MD, PhD, Surgical Pathologist and Cytopathologist Member and Professor, Departments of Pathology, Machine Learning, and Translational Pathology, Scientific Director, Analytic Microscopy Core Chair, Women in Oncology Executive Board Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speakers are being compensated for their presentations. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME credit.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Wednesday, December 9, 2026, 12 PM-1 PM ET
Hear an expert pathologist discuss the role of HER2 IHC testing and scoring in solid tumors including endometrial, ovarian, cervical, bladder, non-small cell lung, colorectal, and biliary cancers

Webinar presenter Michelle Shiller, DO, MSPT, Baylor Sammons Cancer Center; Fulgent Genetics; Texas Cancer Interception Institute

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is intended for US healthcare professionals. This program is being sponsored by AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

Manage Subscription

To receive CAP TODAY magazine, please subscribe here.
For change of address, mail new information to: CAP TODAY Circulation, 325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, IL 60093-2750 or visit here.

November 2020

Molecular pathology selected abstracts

November 2020—Sporadic vascular malformations are congenital malformations of arteries, veins, capillaries, or lymphatic vessels, or a combination of these, and are associated with significant morbidity. The majority of them are caused by postzygotic somatic pathogenic variants in oncogenes in the PI3K-MTOR and RAS-MAPK pathways, including within PIK3CA, TEK, MAP2K1, BRAF, and KRAS. Investigators have assessed whether therapeutic agents targeting these pathways should be used to augment or replace traditional surgical management. But because these somatic variants are restricted to cells within the tissue of vascular malformations (VM), it is necessary to conduct genetic testing on the surgically resected tissue to qualify patients for trials of targeted therapies. Approximately 10 percent of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) originates from endothelial cells.

Anatomic pathology selected abstracts

November 2020—Neuroendocrine neoplasms range from well to poorly differentiated and indolent to highly aggressive. The site of origin in metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms has therapeutic and prognostic implications. SATB2 is a transcriptional regulator involved in osteoblastic and neuronal differentiation and a sensitive and specific marker of colorectal epithelium. The authors conducted a study to evaluate the expression of SATB2 in neuroendocrine neoplasms from various primary sites and its utility as a marker for determining the site of origin of these neoplasms. SATB2 IHC was performed on 266 such neoplasms, including lung small cell carcinomas (n = 39) and carcinoids (n = 30), bladder (n = 21) and prostate (n = 31) small cell carcinomas, and gastrointestinal/pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms of various primary sites (n =145) consisting of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WDNET, n =124) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (PDNEC, n = 21).

Pathology informatics selected abstracts

November 2020—Telepathology is a leading application for digital pathology. The ability to easily share a digital image in practice offers pathology laboratories clinical, operational, and financial benefits. This is best demonstrated by the longstanding success of telepathology in allowing pathologists to remotely perform intraoperative consultations—that is, to read frozen sections. Neuropathologists were one of the first specialists to leverage digital pathology for this clinical use. The authors, all of whom were from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, performed teleneuropathology at their institution, which implemented the practice 17 years ago.

Q&A column

Q. What can laboratories expect to see after a medication such as Narcan is given for an opioid overdose? Read answer.
Q. There are conflicting views among my colleagues regarding the meaning of initial competency assessment. Some think that using a training checklist for new staff counts as the initial competency assessment because we are signing off that staff are competent to perform patient testing and report results. Others believe an initial competency assessment is done shortly after training is completed, followed by the mid-cycle/six-month competency assessment and annual competency assessment. Please clarify. Read answer.
Q. How do you calculate RDW-SD and RDW-CV values in dimorphic anemia cases on the Sysmex XN-3000? Most of the dimorphic anemia cases report a masked parameter. Read answer.

Newsbytes

November 2020—As LigoLab was designing a direct-to-consumer portal for laboratory testing early this year, company CEO Suren Avunjian turned his focus to when in 2021 he would release it, not knowing what was around the corner. But as the number of COVID-19 cases grew to pandemic proportions, Avunjian realized he could and should redesign the portal to streamline SARS-CoV-2 testing.

Put It on the Board

November 2020—In an Association for Molecular Pathology survey, 62 percent of U.S. labs reported using only commercial testing kits with FDA EUA for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing. Five percent reported using laboratory-developed tests only, 26 percent said they were using a combination of LDTs and EUA commercial kits, and six percent reported using LDTs, IRB-approved/non-EUA assays, and commercial kits. Less than one percent reported using a combination of LDTs and IRB-approved/non-EUA assays or a combination of IRB-approved/non-EUA assays and commercial kits.