Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Wednesday, September 23, 2026. 12 PM-1 PM ET
Roundtable presenters Dr. David Sacks MB, ChB, FRCPath, Chairman, Steering Committee National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP), and Priya Sivaraman, PhD, Senior Technical Product Manager, Tosoh Bioscience.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Thursday, September 24, 2026 11 AM-12 PM CT
This session explores the evolving role of RAS in precision oncology, from the biology of RAS mutations to the expanding landscape of targeted therapies. Through expert presentations, real-world case discussions, and interactive audience polling, participants will examine best practices for RAS biomarker testing across solid tumors, including lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. The session will highlight practical considerations for tissue and liquid biopsy, strategies to address testing gaps, and the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration to ensure timely identification of patients who may benefit from RAS-targeted therapies.

Webinar presenters David Braxton, MD, Chief of Molecular Pathology Services, Hoag Family Cancer Institute & Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, and Carlos Becerra, MD, Research Director for Medical Oncology, Margaret Given Larkin Endowed Chair for Developmental Cancer Therapeutics, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Wednesday, September 30, 2026. 1 PM-1:30 PM ET
Roundtable presenters John Longshore, PhD, Head of Scientific Affairs, Global Oncology Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, and Flora Berisha, MS, Executive Director, Global Head of Diagnostic Partnering and Development, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, and Mark D. Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations, Diagnostic Molecular Pathology, Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Isabel Preeshagul, DO, MBS, Thoracic Medical Oncologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Tuesday, October 20, 2026 11 AM-12 PM ET
Hear experts review the biological and clinical significance of the HER2 expression continuum in breast tissue, providing a clearer understanding of how these variations might impact diagnosis, and discuss the emerging importance of documenting HER2-low and HER2-ultralow categories using a validated IHC assay.

Webinar presenters Keith Wharton, MD, PhD, Global Medical Affairs Leader–Pathology,
Roche Diagnostics Solutions, and Hannah Y. Wen, MD, PhD, Director, Breast Pathology Fellowship, Associate Team Leader, Breast Pathology Team, Attending Pathologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

Q&A column

Q&A column

October 2024
Q. Immunofluorescence microscopy results for antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are reported as a titer. How can we best comply with CAP checklist requirement IMM.34120 Daily QC—Nonwaived Tests for ANA testing? Read answer.
Q. Is there a standard of care for anatomic pathology reporting? The CAP document “How to Read Your Pathology Report” states that pathologists “always perform the microscopic evaluation of a specimen, even if the final pathology report does not include a written description.” Must the testing pathology laboratory provide the patient with the microscopic description if it is requested and not included in the pathology report? Read answer.

Q&A column

September 2024
Q. When performing body fluid cell counts, we report total nucleated cells and RBCs. What cell categories should we report on the corresponding differential? Can we group together monocytes, macrophages, and mesothelial cells since it is difficult to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from monocytes and macrophages? If so, what category name should be applied? Should we report mesothelial cells as a comment or include them in the differential? Read answer.
Q. Are nonlaboratory personnel who perform point-of-care testing required to be tested for visual color discrimination? Or is it sufficient that personnel pass a functional assessment during their competency evaluation to evaluate their ability to provide an accurate result on tests that require interpreting colors? Read answer.

Q&A column

August 2024
Q. I have been tasked with doing a quality assurance review comparing automated differential results to the manual differential done on the same patient. Do you have recommendations regarding acceptable analytical criteria? Read answer.
Q. Can activated clotting time results handwritten by a perfusionist be sent to the laboratory to be entered into the laboratory information system? Read answer.

Q&A column

July 2024
Q. Insulin assays traditionally have been used to work up hypoglycemia, but we are noticing more and more requests for insulin and C-peptide testing. Is there a reason for this shift? Read answer.
Q. How should a lot-to-lot formalin comparison be done? Read answer.

Q&A column

June 2024
Q. What are the requirements for correcting an automated white blood cell (WBC) count for the presence of megakaryocytes? Is there a formula for correcting it for megakaryocytes, as there is for the presence of nucleated red blood cells (nRBCs)? Read answer.
Q. Are there guidelines on how often a patient should be monitored for a blood transfusion reaction? Should reactions be monitored as frequently as vital signs? Read answer.

Q&A column

May 2024
Q. I know that CLIA is changing and more tests/analytes will become CMS regulated, along with other changes. Can you provide some background and an overview of the changes and when they will become effective? Read answer.

Q&A column

April 2024
Q. Ordering clinicians are requesting that our laboratory flag abnormally high absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) on peritoneal fluids. We cannot find sources for reference ranges, but there is literature that states that a polymorphonuclear cell count greater than 250/μL is a reliable discriminatory test for bacterial peritonitis. We would like to use this as our reference and flag results with an ANC greater than 250 cells/μL as abnormally high. Is this acceptable? Read answer.

Q. How do you code fallopian tubes submitted for sterilization with a finding of a paratubal cyst? Read answer.

Q&A column

March 2024
Q. Is it a requirement that routine bacteriology cultures (for example, urine, sputum) be plated in a biological safety cabinet in your typical hospital biosafety level 2 laboratory? Is it safe to read these cultures on an open bench? Read answer.

Q. What source should a laboratory use for reference intervals for analytes? Read answer.

Q&A column

Feburary 2024
Q. In a case of suspected drug-related death, how specific can an autopsy be in identifying the drug(s) that might have caused the person’s death and the amount of drugs present? For example, can a toxicology report say a person’s death was caused by a fake oxycodone pill containing fentanyl? Read answer.

Q. A nephrology patient who has been treated with vitamin D2 for several years contacted our laboratory to find out why their 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of 60 ng/mL is now considered elevated when before it was within the normal range. How can we explain this? Read answer.

Q&A column

January 2024
Q. Can a person who has a bachelor of science degree in health care administration sign off on competency assessments? Read answer.

Q. Our laboratory uses a total protein assay from Beckman Coulter that has an analytical measurement range of 3–12 g/dL for serum determinations. The assay sensitivity states 1 g/dL of total protein. Can we loop sensitivity into our AMR and make our reporting range 1–12 g/dL? Will this make our assay a laboratory-developed test? Quite often our clinicians need assays reported to 1 g/dL, since they need to calculate the ratio of total protein serum to body fluid as per Light’s criteria. If we report to 1 g/dL, we have to loop sensitivity into our AMR. Read answer.