Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

July 2020

Clinical pathology selected abstracts

July 2020—The College of American Pathologists launched the Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center for Evidence-Based Guidelines in 2009 to develop and promote laboratory practice guidelines (LPGs) using the National Academy of Medicine’s (NAM) standards for developing trustworthy guidelines. The center has published 17 evidence-based LPGs, including updated versions, using NAM’s criteria. In 2013, the CAP was awarded a five-year cooperative agreement grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to increase the effectiveness of its LPGs. The intent of the agreement was to assess awareness and adoption of two CAP LPGs: IHC assay validation (IHC VAL) and initial workup of acute leukemia (AL).

Anatomic pathology selected abstracts

July 2020—Smooth muscle tumors represent the second most common mural mesenchymal neaoplasm in the gastrointestinal tract, yet established criteria for prognostically assessing these tumors are lacking. The authors conducted a study on a large cohort of surgically resected intramural gastrointestinal smooth muscle tumors from 31 institutions to identify potential prognostic features. At each location, expert gastrointestinal or soft tissue pathologists, or both, assessed pathologic features. IHC confirmation was required.

Molecular pathology selected abstracts

July 2020—Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DiHS/DRESS) is a rare but well-known full-body inflammatory skin condition that leads to life-threatening complications if untreated. The authors conducted a case study that involved a 44-year-old male who developed DiHS/DRESS after taking the combined antibiotic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Following standard treatment for this condition, the patient was started on high-dose prednisone, which provided no benefit. Subsequent tapering of prednisone advanced the disease to a toxic epidermal necrolysis-like condition. The patient was then given etanercept and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin, without benefit. Next, the patient received cyclosporine, which resulted in some improvement but led to uncontrollable renal hypertension.

Q&A column

Q. Is it acceptable for a clinical laboratory to calculate ionized (free) calcium if calcium ion-selective electrode is not available? Are results of calculated ionized (free) calcium of acceptable accuracy in clinical practice? And what is the recommended formula for performing this calculation? Read answer.
Q. Under checklist requirement COM.04250 “Comparability of Instruments and Methods —Nonwaived Testing,” what is the minimum number of samples that should be analyzed and which acceptance criteria should be used for the comparison? In addition, what parameters in the complete blood count do not apply for comparison purposes?
Read answer.
Q. I read an article about phlebotomy that stated for proper patient care, the recommended maximum number of blood draw attempts is four. The hospital at which I work recently implemented a procedure in which the nurses perform blood draws, instead of laboratory personnel. The procedure requires a nurse to attempt a blood draw twice and, if not successful, ask another nurse, and then ask the nursing supervisor before finally calling the laboratory. This policy has been difficult for hospital staff, and I feel terrible for patients who get stuck numerous times. Can you provide feedback that I can use to express my concerns to hospital administration? Read answer.

Newsbytes

July—In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the University of California, Berkeley’s Innovative Genomics Institute decided to rapidly shift gears from conducting research to testing the community for SARS-CoV-2, some insiders may have thought the university was biting off more than it could chew under a tight timeframe. Yet a look at the lab 23 days later surely had any doubters eating their words.

Put It on the Board

AMP recommends PGx alleles for genotyping testing for warfarin response July 2020—The Association for Molecular Pathology published in May consensus, evidence-based recommendations to aid in the design, validation, and interpretation of clinical genotyping tests for the prediction of warfarin response. The new guideline on clinical warfarin sensitivity genotyping allele selection completes a series of three reports intended to facilitate testing and promote standardization for frequently used pharmacogenetics genotyping assays. Developed by the AMP PGx Working Group with organizational representation from