Wednesday, September 23, 2026. 12 PM-1 PM ET
Roundtable presenters Dr. David Sacks MB, ChB, FRCPath, Chairman, Steering Committee National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP), and Priya Sivaraman, PhD, Senior Technical Product Manager, Tosoh Bioscience.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Thursday, September 24, 2026 11 AM-12 PM CT
This session explores the evolving role of RAS in precision oncology, from the biology of RAS mutations to the expanding landscape of targeted therapies. Through expert presentations, real-world case discussions, and interactive audience polling, participants will examine best practices for RAS biomarker testing across solid tumors, including lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. The session will highlight practical considerations for tissue and liquid biopsy, strategies to address testing gaps, and the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration to ensure timely identification of patients who may benefit from RAS-targeted therapies.
Webinar presenters David Braxton, MD, Chief of Molecular Pathology Services, Hoag Family Cancer Institute & Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, and Carlos Becerra, MD, Research Director for Medical Oncology, Margaret Given Larkin Endowed Chair for Developmental Cancer Therapeutics, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Wednesday, September 30, 2026. 1 PM-1:30 PM ET
Roundtable presenters John Longshore, PhD, Head of Scientific Affairs, Global Oncology Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, and Flora Berisha, MS, Executive Director, Global Head of Diagnostic Partnering and Development, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, and Mark D. Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations, Diagnostic Molecular Pathology, Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Isabel Preeshagul, DO, MBS, Thoracic Medical Oncologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Tuesday, October 20, 2026 11 AM-12 PM ET
Hear experts review the biological and clinical significance of the HER2 expression continuum in breast tissue, providing a clearer understanding of how these variations might impact diagnosis, and discuss the emerging importance of documenting HER2-low and HER2-ultralow categories using a validated IHC assay.
Webinar presenters Keith Wharton, MD, PhD, Global Medical Affairs Leader–Pathology,
Roche Diagnostics Solutions, and Hannah Y. Wen, MD, PhD, Director, Breast Pathology Fellowship, Associate Team Leader, Breast Pathology Team, Attending Pathologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
July 2020—It is with profound sadness that I write about the passing of a dear friend. Gene Herbek, MD, served as president of the CAP from 2013 to 2015, and many CAP TODAY readers will remember his informative column in these pages. For details about his life and accomplishments, please read his obituary in this issue (page 12). I’d like to spend this column focused on how he shaped the CAP, and what an honor it was to have known him.
July 2020— Gene N. Herbek, MD, CAP president from 2013 to 2015, died June 4 after a brief illness. He was a CAP governor from 1998 to 2004 and secretary-treasurer from 2006 to 2011. Dr. Herbek was medical director of the Methodist Women’s Hospital laboratory and medical director of transfusion services for The Pathology Center at Methodist Hospital, Omaha, Neb. He chaired multiple CAP groups over the years, among them the councils on Public Affairs and Membership and Public Affairs and the Finance, Credentials, Nominating, Political Action, and Insurance committees.
July 2020—The College of American Pathologists launched the Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center for Evidence-Based Guidelines in 2009 to develop and promote laboratory practice guidelines (LPGs) using the National Academy of Medicine’s (NAM) standards for developing trustworthy guidelines. The center has published 17 evidence-based LPGs, including updated versions, using NAM’s criteria. In 2013, the CAP was awarded a five-year cooperative agreement grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to increase the effectiveness of its LPGs. The intent of the agreement was to assess awareness and adoption of two CAP LPGs: IHC assay validation (IHC VAL) and initial workup of acute leukemia (AL).
July 2020—Smooth muscle tumors represent the second most common mural mesenchymal neaoplasm in the gastrointestinal tract, yet established criteria for prognostically assessing these tumors are lacking. The authors conducted a study on a large cohort of surgically resected intramural gastrointestinal smooth muscle tumors from 31 institutions to identify potential prognostic features. At each location, expert gastrointestinal or soft tissue pathologists, or both, assessed pathologic features. IHC confirmation was required.
July 2020—Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DiHS/DRESS) is a rare but well-known full-body inflammatory skin condition that leads to life-threatening complications if untreated. The authors conducted a case study that involved a 44-year-old male who developed DiHS/DRESS after taking the combined antibiotic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Following standard treatment for this condition, the patient was started on high-dose prednisone, which provided no benefit. Subsequent tapering of prednisone advanced the disease to a toxic epidermal necrolysis-like condition. The patient was then given etanercept and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin, without benefit. Next, the patient received cyclosporine, which resulted in some improvement but led to uncontrollable renal hypertension.
Q. Is it acceptable for a clinical laboratory to calculate ionized (free) calcium if calcium ion-selective electrode is not available? Are results of calculated ionized (free) calcium of acceptable accuracy in clinical practice? And what is the recommended formula for performing this calculation? Read answer.
Q. Under checklist requirement COM.04250 “Comparability of Instruments and Methods —Nonwaived Testing,” what is the minimum number of samples that should be analyzed and which acceptance criteria should be used for the comparison? In addition, what parameters in the complete blood count do not apply for comparison purposes?
Read answer.
Q. I read an article about phlebotomy that stated for proper patient care, the recommended maximum number of blood draw attempts is four. The hospital at which I work recently implemented a procedure in which the nurses perform blood draws, instead of laboratory personnel. The procedure requires a nurse to attempt a blood draw twice and, if not successful, ask another nurse, and then ask the nursing supervisor before finally calling the laboratory. This policy has been difficult for hospital staff, and I feel terrible for patients who get stuck numerous times. Can you provide feedback that I can use to express my concerns to hospital administration? Read answer.
July—In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the University of California, Berkeley’s Innovative Genomics Institute decided to rapidly shift gears from conducting research to testing the community for SARS-CoV-2, some insiders may have thought the university was biting off more than it could chew under a tight timeframe. Yet a look at the lab 23 days later surely had any doubters eating their words.
AMP recommends PGx alleles for genotyping testing for warfarin response July 2020—The Association for Molecular Pathology published in May consensus, evidence-based recommendations to aid in the design, validation, and interpretation of clinical genotyping tests for the prediction of warfarin response. The new guideline on clinical warfarin sensitivity genotyping allele selection completes a series of three reports intended to facilitate testing and promote standardization for frequently used pharmacogenetics genotyping assays. Developed by the AMP PGx Working Group with organizational representation from
June 2020—The arrival of a pandemic has shown—among many, many other things—that anyone who talks about it typically starts by saying, “This is a pandemic.” The next sentence tends to be, “It’s a completely different situation,” whether the focus is grocery shopping, exercising (or not), voting, or practicing medicine. Pointing to the pandemic is a polite way of saying, “All bets are off.” For many, it’s been a springboard to innovation and breakthroughs, even in the midst of considerable anguish. For clinical laboratories, however, much has felt unsettling, especially when the conversation turns to serology testing for SARS-CoV-2. It’s a topic stuffed to overflowing with interest, enthusiasm—and, early on, antibody tests themselves.
Published in June:
Autopsies show many faces of COVID-19
Sudden” and “global” are descriptors that seldom appear in tandem, especially in relation to disease epidemiology. But they both fit the COVID-19 pandemic, which has left the health care world reeling. “COVID-19 has infected the entire planet pretty much all at once,” says Alex K. Williamson, MD. Read more.
