Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

2021 Issues

Pathology informatics selected abstracts

July 2021—Despite growing awareness of whole slide imaging, few pathology laboratories have implemented and validated such a digital pathology system for primary diagnosis. Among the barriers to adopting whole slide imaging (WSI) for routine clinical work is the difficulty of justifying the expense, time and effort, and change management involved in deploying this disruptive technology.

Molecular pathology selected abstracts

July 2021—The accurate diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma is important because of its association with asbestos inhalation and because it is an aggressive tumor with poor outcome despite multimodal treatment. Unfortunately, however, diagnosing malignant pleural mesothelioma is not straightforward. Initial diagnosis often occurs on small biopsies, and the disease has morphologic overlap not only with other neoplasms that affect the lungs and pleura, such as solitary fibrous tumor or synovial sarcoma, but also with reactive conditions, such as reactive mesothelial hyperplasia or sclerosing fibrous pleuritis. While immunohistochemical markers can provide ancillary information, many of them are nonspecific and can lead to diagnostic dilemmas. Sequencing of cancer genes can help in some situations but cannot provide a definitive diagnosis.

Q&A column

July 2021
Q. Our lab does not have reference ranges established for body fluid manual differentials. Is it acceptable to use ranges from a reference material and include a disclaimer citing the source of the ranges? Read answer.
Q. In our lab, we perform semen analysis and make slides to send out for sperm morphology using Kruger’s strict criteria. We get quite a few results back as swollen sperm head for probable contamination. The reference lab insisted that liquefying agent was added, but when we reviewed the results, the sample was normal, so liquefying agent wasn’t used. What can cause a sperm head to swell, other than liquefying agent? Read answer.

Newsbytes

July 2021—As the role of informatics in the practice of medicine continues to grow, so does the need to move formalized informatics education from the category of luxury to necessity, says Bruce Levy, MD, associate chief medical informatics officer at Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pa., and professor and program director of the clinical informatics fellowship at Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine.

Letters

July 2021—The article about eGFR (“A transparent lens on estimated GFR,” June 2021) reinforces my initial attitude about eGFR: that it is an inaccurate contrived calculation. Testing for the status of a patient’s renal function is information too crucial to be done as a shortcut even though the National Kidney Foundation claims that eGFR is the most accurate way of determining renal function.

Put It on the Board

July 2021—The FDA in May approved two new targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer.

Higher stakes in systemic mastocytosis​

June 2021—Mastocytosis is not for quitters. Not at any point, from considering the possible diagnosis, to doing a complement of stains, to looking for mutations beyond KIT D816V, to being curious about the presence of mast cells even after making a diagnosis of another myeloid disease. Patients have already learned this grueling lesson. They can easily spend years seeking answers before their disease is properly identified. Pathologists can speed up that process—and the time to do so is now, says Tracy George, MD, chief medical officer and incoming president of ARUP Laboratories, and medical director of hematopathology. Notes Dr. George: “There’s some exciting stuff going on with systemic mastocytosis.” New targeted KIT inhibitors appear to be quite effective, including at least one agent for advanced systemic mastocytosis that has been submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. “We anticipate there’s going to be approval by the FDA this summer,” says Dr. George, who’s been involved in the clinical trials for avapritinib (Blueprint Medicines).

1- or 2-step: Outcomes studied in GDM screening

June 2021—If screening for gestational diabetes mellitus were a dance competition, it might have a contest between quickstep and paso doble as its signature event. That tournament could pit the one-step testing protocol (twice as likely to diagnose GDM) against the two-step testing protocol (significantly easier for pregnant women to adhere to).

Puzzling out platelet function disorders

June 2021—In an AACC virtual session last December, Catherine P. M. Hayward, MD, PhD, of McMaster University, set out the stepwise approach to testing for platelet function disorders, explained the methods used to assess platelet aggregation response, and reported what most clinical labs do.

Virtual, blended inspections a sign of the times

June 2021—As COVID-19 restrictions halted traditional laboratory inspections, virtual and blended inspections became the stand-ins, and early adopters say there’s much to like and hold on to post-pandemic.