Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

All Issues

Molecular pathology selected abstracts

April 2024—Personalized medicine is revolutionizing cancer therapy, with targeted treatments customized to a person’s cancer-specific mutational profile leading to substantially improved health outcomes. Personalized medicine can also be applied to cancer prevention for high-risk groups based on genetic predisposition or lifestyle factors. However, there is a significant gap in cancer research resulting from a lack of equitable representation of racial and ethnic groups in cancer databases. Most research data are derived from white patients in the United States and Europe, creating racial disparities in understanding cancer development and therapies. The underrepresentation of patients of African, Asian, and Native American descent in observational, translational, and clinical cancer studies is particularly notable.

Newsbytes

April 2024—Transitioning to digital pathology can seem complex and costly. And for some, but not all, laboratories, cost in particular can be a barrier to adoption. So how do you determine which camp your lab falls into? You calculate, according to Orly Ardon, PhD, director of digital pathology operations at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Q&A column

April 2024
Q. Ordering clinicians are requesting that our laboratory flag abnormally high absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) on peritoneal fluids. We cannot find sources for reference ranges, but there is literature that states that a polymorphonuclear cell count greater than 250/μL is a reliable discriminatory test for bacterial peritonitis. We would like to use this as our reference and flag results with an ANC greater than 250 cells/μL as abnormally high. Is this acceptable? Read answer.

Q. How do you code fallopian tubes submitted for sterilization with a finding of a paratubal cyst? Read answer.

Put It on the Board

April 2024—Member organizations of the Enduring Consensus Cervical Cancer Screening and Management Guidelines effort released in March their recommendations for the use of p16/Ki-67 dual stain for managing individuals who test positive for HPV.

Letters

April 2024—The article “Test adds twists to lung disease diagnosis” (November 2023, page 1) virtually ignores the major problem of clinicians in the hospital thinking that it is perfectly okay to take specimens from patients in the hospital and send them directly to whatever laboratory they choose without input from the hospital’s laboratory administration or medical director. The laboratory medical director is legally responsible for approving the menu of laboratory tests to be performed in-house and all of the reference laboratories to be used.

Game’s afoot in bladder cancer research

March 2024—Like identifying the shift in battle that leads to victory, or the battle that wins the war—let alone declaring a war’s ultimate victor—it’s hard to gauge the whens, ifs, and hows that mark progress in medicine. For those who are deeply rooted in bringing advances to testing in urothelial cancers, current research is flourishing and flummoxing. In early and late stage, both for bladder and upper tract disease, recently approved therapies are leading to better outcomes for patients. More immunotherapies and antibody-drug conjugates are on their way, and with them come new options for testing. But as with any cancer, researchers follow numerous promising paths, knowing that some will dead-end and others will succeed primarily (albeit usefully) in raising more questions. Nevertheless, they continue to rally the work forward, with multiple breaches, and Agincourt, ever in sight. For experts such as David McConkey, PhD, progress will best be measured by how regularly precision makes its way into the clinical setting.

In diabetes patients, biomarker use for early-stage HF

March 2024—For patients with type 2 diabetes, the cardiac biomarkers are a better predictor of early-stage heart failure than conventional risk prediction scores. “We need to use biomarkers,” says Petr Jarolim, MD, PhD.

Survey probes staff shortage in genomics labs

March 2024—From a technologist workforce perspective, clinical genomics laboratories are in trouble. “It’s truly a crisis,” said Marco Leung, PhD, clinical director of the Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio.

AP and CP reporting, from interfaces to IT wishes

March 2024—Anatomic and clinical pathology reporting—what’s working, what’s missing. Three pathologists (all board certified in informatics) and representatives of three information system companies met online Dec. 19 with CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle to talk about reporting needs and what’s optimal. The first half of their discussion was published in the February issue, with CAP TODAY’s guide to anatomic pathology computer systems. The second half begins here.