Linkedin X-twitter Youtube
Launch Digital Edition

Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Register Now

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Register Now

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

From the President’s Desk

From the President’s Desk

December 2022—Many of us were raised on alluring stories of the good old days in medicine, when physicians enjoyed long-term, respectful relationships with their patients. I grew up hearing from my father, an obstetrician/gynecologist, and my mother, a nurse, about their frustrating transition from this to a modern reality in which these relationships were strained by a seemingly impenetrable health care bureaucracy. Like so many pathologists, I have felt intimidated by such behemoths as the CMS, the FDA, and insurance companies, as well as smaller monoliths like the C-suites or dean’s office at health systems and medical schools where I have practiced. But what I have realized by working with the CAP is that dealing with these entities can be more manageable when we create positive and productive relationships with the people who work in them.

From the President’s Desk

November 2022—Like me, many of you can remember when you first thought about specializing in pathology, a decision that for a lot of us was made difficult by the notion of “disappearing” from the scene—working behind the scenes and in relative obscurity. As a specialty we are not as self-explanatory as surgery or pediatrics; indeed it can be exhausting for all concerned to explain, even to our fellow physicians, what we do. And so we often find ourselves somewhere between disregarded and misunderstood. Despite this, there is no other specialty with comparable impact. We are aware each time we sign a pathology report that a cascade of usually predictable consequences will ensue, and that upon this work the types of treatment, expectations for response, and tenor of conversations will depend. We know each time we validate a new test, review quality metrics, or accept a specimen for testing that subsequent laboratory results will be accepted as credible and acted upon. In short, while pathologists are not always visible, there can be no doubt that pathologists are palpable.

From the President’s Desk

October 2022—When I was in pathology training back in the ’90s, physicians carried around an index card for each patient, with all of the information we needed to know about them easily covered in that small space.

Today, the practice of medicine—and specifically the practice of pathology—looks very different in the era of big data. Of course, we still have to fill our traditional roles: making the correct diagnosis for individual patients and ensuring the integrity of laboratory results. But increasingly large data sets inform the diagnosis in individual cases and, at the same time, individual cases become data points in large data sets that inform the health of populations. Beginning in the 2000s with the value-based care movement and accelerating with the rise of high-parameter tests, we find ourselves having to be data scientists as much as physicians. We are being asked to incorporate data-heavy tests and pipelines, some of which require clinical decision support algorithms that demand a certain fluency with more sophisticated software. We find ourselves in the new position of considering population health in addition to patient health, an element that can involve predictive analytics and data mining.

From the President’s Desk

September 2022—Like so many pathologists, I have been keeping a close eye on the VALID Act, which would create a new framework for FDA oversight of laboratory-developed tests (LDTs). As I write this, the VALID Act has been voted out of a Senate committee and now awaits further action by the full Senate. I have heard from some pathologists and laboratorians who are concerned about this legislation and about the CAP position on it since the Senate HELP Committee released a draft on May 17, 2022. If you have not followed this bill and the issues of LDT oversight, allow me to offer some context. Regulatory oversight of LDTs has been in active discussion since 2008 when the FDA intervened with a national reference laboratory that was selling a test that had been developed at a prestigious university to identify high-risk women who might have ovarian cancer. Patient advocacy groups had raised a concern because several women had undergone unnecessary prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy based on this LDT. In response, the FDA expressed concern about the public harm, and the reference laboratory pulled the test from the market.

From the President’s Desk

August 2022—The CAP has been advocating for an increase in residency slots that would help give more young physicians the opportunity to embrace careers in pathology. We support the Resident Physician Shortage Reduction Act, bipartisan legislation that is working its way through both chambers of Congress. It would add 14,000 Medicare-supported residency slots over the course of seven years and help ensure an open pipeline for pathologists. Between pandemic burnout and the retirement cliff resulting from an aging population of physicians, we are facing a shortage of all physicians, pathologists included. The CAP projects that the number of pathologists will shrink in the coming years. Unfortunately, when there are not enough pathologists to lead clinical laboratory teams, it creates a gap that has to be filled somehow. Many of us have already seen health care gaps being filled by people with less extensive and intensive training.

From the President’s Desk

July 2022—The CAP has been looking to identify areas where pathologists can help overcome institutional bias in medicine. As you may have seen, the CAP recently issued a statement supporting a new position from the American Medical Association that calls for a change to the FDA’s policy about blood donations from men who have sex with men. The current rule, established in early 2020 in response to a drastic blood shortage associated with pandemic lockdowns, prohibits blood donations from gay or bisexual men who have engaged in sexual activity in the prior three months. Previously, only gay or bisexual men who abstained from sex for a full year were eligible to donate blood. Many of you remember as I do the societal rejection of HIV-positive patients that occurred in the late ’80s. I was in medical school at this time, working at the county hospital in Kansas City, Mo. A lack of access to health care elsewhere was only one form of rejection to which our HIV-positive patients were subjected.

From the President’s Desk

June 2022—You’re probably familiar with the expression “jack of all trades, master of none.” While that sounds disparaging, it’s actually taken out of context. The original quote in its entirety is, “A jack of all trades is a master of none, but oftentimes better than a master of one.” It was intended as a compliment for someone who had good, broad knowledge. The widespread misinterpretation of that quote supports a common idea that no individual can be really good at a lot of different things. But pathologists challenge that concept every day. While many of us subspecialize, we are able to fall back on our broad training when circumstances require it. Such may be the case when encountering pathologic findings that indicate a disorder not commonly found in our area of expertise, or findings that indicate a systemic illness. Many of us find that we have to be experts on different things on different days and in different parts of our career.

From the President’s Desk

May 2022—In the 1990s, as immunohistochemistry was first adopted in clinical laboratories, there was palpable fear among many pathologists who believed our expertise would no longer have a role in health care. The prevailing sentiment at the time was, “If the brown stain lights up, you know it’s cancer, and they won’t need pathologists anymore.” Of course, nothing could have been further from the truth. Having IHC capabilities meant there was more information that we had to process. It enabled us to extract more information from a tissue sample and to do more for our patients, but it also required more of us in terms of test selection, test interpretation, and communicating what it all meant to our fellow clinicians. More recently, next-generation sequencing has given us more, not less, to do; far from replacing us, such innovations require more of us to realize their full potential. These additions have not necessarily made our lives easier, but they have absolutely made what we can offer our patients richer and more precise.

From the President’s Desk

What you’ll get from the Leadership Summit
April 2022—The end of this month marks the start of one of my favorite CAP events: the Pathologists Leadership Summit. If you’re not familiar with it or haven’t signed up to attend, I’d like to give you a sense of why it’s so important. Back in the early 2000s, I attended what was known as CAP Advocacy School. At that point in my career, I had seen many physicians who felt discouraged, frustrated, and helpless about the state of physician payments and government health care regulations, and I understood those feelings. Advocacy School offered a solution. What struck me about this program was the message that we were not powerless. Through this meeting, the CAP taught me that my government representatives would be interested in what I had to say as an expert physician. I was partnered with Richard Hausner, MD, a seasoned pathologist advocate.

From the President’s Desk

Strengthen your state societies
March 2022—If you’re reading this column, you’re likely a member of the CAP. But are you also a member of your state pathology society? Too many pathologists think that joining the CAP is enough. The truth is, the CAP can have a greater impact—and pathologists can be more effective physician advocates for their patients—when partnering with robust state pathology societies. State societies are essential because so many of the policies and regulations governing our work as pathologists are enacted at the state level. Balance billing rules, scope of practice issues, and insurance regulations are often decided by each state. So many issues about how we are licensed, how we practice, and how we get paid are regulated at the state level.

MARKETPLACE

TRENDING