Linkedin X-twitter Youtube
Launch Digital Edition

Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Register Now

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Register Now

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

Put It on the Board

Put It on the Board

November 2025—The FDA cleared Roche’s Elecsys pTau181 test, a blood-based biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease assessment in patients 55 and older. The CAP requested an exception for physician J-1 visa holders, concerned the proposed four-year visa limit could hinder international medical graduates pursuing pathology careers. The Association for Molecular Pathology and CAP published a consensus recommendation for a simplified next-generation sequencing molecular biomarker report template.

Put It on the Board

October 2025—Send-out and other high-cost tests are the typical targets of lab stewardship, but a clinical decision support session at the ADLM meeting in July had a different focus: daily labs. It’s generally believed there is little to no opportunity for savings on daily labs because the reagent cost per test is low, as is the incremental labor savings for tests performed on automated instruments. Instead, said Grace Mahowald, MD, PhD, informatician and director of the core laboratory at Massachusetts General Hospital, “think about what goes into the cost of each of our daily lab tests,” from the nurse, patient care assistant, and phlebotomist to the specimen transporter and the lab receiving staff and technical staff who review results and call providers when specimens have to be refused at receipt. “And it’s questionable if people are even looking at the result,” she said.

Put It on the Board

September 2025—CAP president Donald Karcher, MD, in a July 25 letter urged the chairs and ranking members of the Senate and House appropriations subcommittee on labor, health and human services, education, and related agencies to apply pressure to obligate and award already approved funding for the CDC Division of Cancer Prevention and Control. “Even though Congress approved FY 2025 funding in March, the CDC has not issued notice of awards to provide funding to state and local health departments for the remaining FY 2025 funds,” he said. “State and local health departments are challenged to continue their work without knowing if they will be reimbursed. State health departments and grantees are on the verge of shutting down programs and furloughing staff.”

Put It on the Board

August 2025—In a position statement released in July, the CAP urged policymakers to consider scientific and logistical evidence and to protect the integrity and safety of the national blood supply. The statement was issued in response to legislation proposed in several states that would require blood product labeling based on donor vaccination status or mandate hospitals and blood collectors to honor requests for directed and autologous donations. Misinformation surrounding COVID-19 and mRNA vaccines has led to a growing number of patient requests for blood transfusions exclusively from unvaccinated donors.

Put It on the Board

July 2025—The length of time to install digital pathology equipment, interface, implement, train, and go live in 10 large laboratories ranged from under one year to about 18 months, and the time spent prior to that—evaluating options, gaining budget approval, making decisions, and completing the contract and negotiation process—took eight months to a year for seven of the 10. For two others, the evaluation, decision-making, and contracting process took about 18 months, and for one it took five years, largely owing to pandemic-related delay.

Put It on the Board

June 2025—A Labcorp survey of more than 100 genetic counselors, including 15 hours of one-one-one conversations, found their three pain points to be balancing patient care and administrative demands, the financial difficulties that complex genetic testing presents, and staying on top of scientific and technologic advances in genetics. Of the time constraints, one genetic counselor at a large health system said, “Anything a lab partner can do, from making their portal easier to get reports or having easy access to someone on their end to help me with some questions, all that gives me more time with the patient.”

Put It on the Board

May 2025—Ninety-nine percent of laboratory professionals say medical couriers impact their work in a “typical week,” with 81 percent of respondents who work in acute care labs indicating the impact is “significant,” according to a CAP TODAY survey sponsored by MedSpeed. Of the 318 laboratory professionals who responded to the 2025 CAP TODAY survey, 84 percent said that in the last month a medical courier delay or error impacted their ability to provide appropriate and timely results for patients, with an average of three such incidents reported per month per respondent. Fifty-six percent of laboratory directors, managers, and supervisors indicated that a courier error compromised an irreplaceable specimen in the last year, with an average of two such incidents reported per respondent per year. And 83 percent of laboratory directors, managers, and supervisors said courier reliability affects their decision to partner with specialty labs or complementary labs for send-out and referral testing.

 

Put It on the Board

April 2025—The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled on March 31 in favor of the laboratory plaintiffs in the two consolidated cases challenging the validity of the Food and Drug Administration’s final rule on laboratory-developed tests. The plaintiffs in the cases were the American Clinical Laboratory Association, Association for Molecular Pathology, HealthTrackRX and HealthTrackRX Indiana, and pathologist Michael Laposata, MD. The ruling by Judge Sean D. Jordan ordered that the plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment be granted. The final rule that would have regulated LDTs as medical devices under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act was vacated.

Put It on the Board

March 2025—The Roche Tina-quant Lipoprotein (a) Gen.2 Molarity assay received 510(k) clearance from the Food and Drug Administration. It is the first 510(k)-cleared test of its kind available in the U.S. to measure lipoprotein(a) in nanomoles per liter. It will be broadly available on Cobas c analyzers. Lp(a) can vary in size and has no single, defined molecular weight. For this reason, Roche says, there is a consensus in the scientific community that Lp(a) levels should be measured in terms of the number of particles per liter of blood (nmol/L), rather than mass units (mg/dL), and that any conversion between mass and molar units is generally imprecise and unreliable. By using molar units, laboratory professionals and clinicians know the Lp(a) measurements reflect the number of particles rather than a difference in particle size.

Put It on the Board

February 2025—Roche’s whole slide imaging system, Roche Digital Pathology Dx, received an additional 510(k) clearance from the Food and Drug Administration. This latest clearance modifies the one Roche received in June 2024 for Roche Digital Pathology Dx, which includes the Ventana DP 200 slide scanner.

MARKETPLACE

TRENDING