Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, October 20, 2026, 11 AM-12 PM ET
Hear experts review the biological and clinical significance of the HER2 expression continuum in breast tissue, providing a clearer understanding of how these variations might impact diagnosis, and discuss the emerging importance of documenting HER2-low and HER2-ultralow categories using a validated IHC assay.

Webinar presenters Keith Wharton, MD, PhD, Global Medical Affairs Leader–Pathology, Roche Diagnostics Solutions, and Hannah Y. Wen, MD, PhD, Director, Breast Pathology Fellowship, Associate Team Leader, Breast Pathology Team, Attending Pathologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Roche.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Thursday, October 29, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the evolving role of PD-L1 testing in HNSCC and ovarian cancer.

Webinar presenter Georgios Deftereos, MD, Professor of Pathology, Associate Director of the Clinical Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Director of Molecular Cytopathology, University of California, San Francisco

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Agilent.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Tuesday, November 3, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the challenges of detecting NRG1 fusions and how RNA-based testing can support more comprehensive fusion identification in clinical practice.

Webinar presenter Benjamin Weinberg, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine and Attending Physician
specializing in gastrointestinal medical oncology

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Diaceutics.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Monday, November 16, 2026, 12:30 PM-2 PM ET
Hear experts discuss a multidisciplinary approach to oncopathology for HER2
assessments for solid tumors in the absence of a companion diagnostic.

Webinar presenters Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD, Chair, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Medical Director, Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Emina E. Torlakovic, MD, PhD, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, and Carol Cheung, MD, PhD, JD, FRCPC, Deputy Director, Canadian Biomarker Quality, Assurance—Programme canadien d’assurance de la qualité des biomarqueurs

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

Q&A column

Q&A column

June 2022
Q. Can bronchoalveolar lavage specimens from multiple lobes be pooled for culture? Can multiple biopsies from the same joint be pooled for culture? Read answer.

Q. We verify our reference intervals with each new reagent lot for coagulation tests (PT, APTT, fibrinogen, and TT). What difference in values between lots necessitates establishing a new reference interval?

A CAP TODAY Q&A from January 2015 mentions limits within 1.5 seconds of each other between new and old reagent lots for human recombinant PT. What about limits for APTT and fibrinogen? Read answer.

Q&A column

May 2022
Q. Should peritoneal dialysis fluid collected directly from a patient be considered peritoneal fluid or peritoneal dialysate fluid? A clinician at my institution placed an order for peritoneal dialysate fluid because the fluid was to be collected from the patient, not from the bag. Read answer.
Q. What types of materials (for example, QC materials, patient samples, or both) can be used to check new reagent lots on my chemistry analyzer? We have three chemistry analyzers of the same model. Do we need to perform reagent lot studies on all three? Read answer.

Q&A column

April 2022
Q. Is it necessary to perform a manual cell count for body fluids, including CSF, using a hemocytometer? Can clinical decisions be made based on low cell counts in body fluid reported by automated cell counters since these instruments have decreased precision and accuracy with low counts? Read answer.
Q. Is there a time limit for a critical value—for example, when a specimen is drawn at 8 AM, the lab receives it at 5 PM (due to courier issues) and has a result at 10 PM, and the value falls in the critical range? Since it is now 14 hours after the draw, the lab value may no longer be actionable. No clinician would act on a critical value that is a week old, so at what point is the lab value no longer considered critical? Read answer.
Q. Given that blood specimen collection tubes are in short supply, many laboratories may need to switch to an alternative collection tube manufacturer. What validation studies are necessary before an alternative collection tube can be implemented? Read answer.

Q&A column

March 2022
Q. Are Pancoast tumors a fast-growing, untreatable cancer? Read answer.
Q. When performing reagent lot-to-lot correlation studies, some staff believe it is better to perform instrument calibration before a new reagent lot check while others believe calibration is not necessary. What is the appropriate practice? Read answer.

Q&A column

February 2022
Q. Are there established benchmarks for such transfusion services quality monitors as C:T ratio, blood product waste, and cancellation of suboptimal specimens? Read answer.
Q. If we collect only enough blood to inoculate one blood culture bottle, should we inoculate the aerobic or anaerobic bottle? Read answer.

Q&A column

January 2022
Q. When reporting reference ranges for absolute differential counts, should the ranges be age specific or is a single reference range acceptable? Read answer.
Q. Is it acceptable to use polystyrene tubes for aliquotting plasma for coagulation tests, such as platelet aggregation, and factor-related studies requiring serial dilutions of plasma? I recall seeing recommendations for using nonpolystyrene tubes for frozen plasma aliquots but did not see a reason for the recommendation. Read answer.

Q&A column

December 2021
Q. We use the CAP Competency Assessment Program to create quizzes to satisfy the problem-solving element of the CAP’s competency assessment requirements. Is there a requirement to create a new quiz each year or can the same quiz be given every year? Is it OK to use the same quiz for the initial competency and the annual competency? Read answer.
Q. Are there red blood cell parameters, such as RBC count or mean corpuscular volume, that can affect a platelet estimate? When determining a platelet estimate, should we always look at the same area of the slide regardless of the patient’s RBC, hematocrit and hemoglobin levels, and indices results? Read answer.

Q&A column

November 2021
Q. I am a nurse in a cardiac cath lab that performs point-of-care testing, including for activated clotting time. At my hospital, the POC testing coordinator only allows other cath lab staff, usually nurses, to use POC testing equipment if they have a copy of their diploma. Can staff who have proof of licensure (such as from the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists) but do not have a copy of their diploma be authorized to use POC testing equipment? Read answer.

Q. I recently joined a hospital laboratory that verifies reagents lot to lot with patient samples using a percentage difference of 10 for all parameters. The hospital lab where I previously worked used a CLIA allowable-error percentage. Is 10 percent allowable error acceptable for reagent lot-to-lot verification for all parameters? Read answer.

Q&A column

October 2021
Q. After naloxone is administered, are opiates still detectable in the body? If so, for how long and in what quantities? Read answer.

Q. Why do proficiency testing specimen results for common immunoassay analytes sometimes vary greatly with different instrument manufacturers and their reagents? Does that mean the patient’s results for the same specimen could vary greatly based on the instrument used? If so, is this acceptable? Wouldn’t the variation in results confuse the clinician and patient? Read answer.

Q&A column

September 2021
Q. What is the ideal collection tube for measuring the level of ammonia in blood? Is a tube containing EDTA suitable?Read answer.
Q. Is there a requirement to notify nursing personnel or doctors about each critical value obtained for a patient after the initial occurrence of the critical result?Read answer.