Linkedin X-twitter Youtube
Launch Digital Edition

Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Wednesday, September 23, 2026. 12 PM-1 PM ET
Roundtable presenters Dr. David Sacks MB, ChB, FRCPath, Chairman, Steering Committee National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP), and Priya Sivaraman, PhD, Senior Technical Product Manager, Tosoh Bioscience.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Thursday, September 24, 2026 11 AM-12 PM CT
This session explores the evolving role of RAS in precision oncology, from the biology of RAS mutations to the expanding landscape of targeted therapies. Through expert presentations, real-world case discussions, and interactive audience polling, participants will examine best practices for RAS biomarker testing across solid tumors, including lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. The session will highlight practical considerations for tissue and liquid biopsy, strategies to address testing gaps, and the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration to ensure timely identification of patients who may benefit from RAS-targeted therapies.

Webinar presenters David Braxton, MD, Chief of Molecular Pathology Services, Hoag Family Cancer Institute & Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, and Carlos Becerra, MD, Research Director for Medical Oncology, Margaret Given Larkin Endowed Chair for Developmental Cancer Therapeutics, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Wednesday, September 30, 2026. 1 PM-1:30 PM ET
Roundtable presenters John Longshore, PhD, Head of Scientific Affairs, Global Oncology Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, and Flora Berisha, MS, Executive Director, Global Head of Diagnostic Partnering and Development, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, and Mark D. Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations, Diagnostic Molecular Pathology, Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Isabel Preeshagul, DO, MBS, Thoracic Medical Oncologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Tuesday, October 20, 2026 11 AM-12 PM ET
Hear experts review the biological and clinical significance of the HER2 expression continuum in breast tissue, providing a clearer understanding of how these variations might impact diagnosis, and discuss the emerging importance of documenting HER2-low and HER2-ultralow categories using a validated IHC assay.

Webinar presenters Keith Wharton, MD, PhD, Global Medical Affairs Leader–Pathology,
Roche Diagnostics Solutions, and Hannah Y. Wen, MD, PhD, Director, Breast Pathology Fellowship, Associate Team Leader, Breast Pathology Team, Attending Pathologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

Q&A column

Q&A column

May 2022
Q. Should peritoneal dialysis fluid collected directly from a patient be considered peritoneal fluid or peritoneal dialysate fluid? A clinician at my institution placed an order for peritoneal dialysate fluid because the fluid was to be collected from the patient, not from the bag. Read answer.
Q. What types of materials (for example, QC materials, patient samples, or both) can be used to check new reagent lots on my chemistry analyzer? We have three chemistry analyzers of the same model. Do we need to perform reagent lot studies on all three? Read answer.

Q&A column

April 2022
Q. Is it necessary to perform a manual cell count for body fluids, including CSF, using a hemocytometer? Can clinical decisions be made based on low cell counts in body fluid reported by automated cell counters since these instruments have decreased precision and accuracy with low counts? Read answer.
Q. Is there a time limit for a critical value—for example, when a specimen is drawn at 8 AM, the lab receives it at 5 PM (due to courier issues) and has a result at 10 PM, and the value falls in the critical range? Since it is now 14 hours after the draw, the lab value may no longer be actionable. No clinician would act on a critical value that is a week old, so at what point is the lab value no longer considered critical? Read answer.
Q. Given that blood specimen collection tubes are in short supply, many laboratories may need to switch to an alternative collection tube manufacturer. What validation studies are necessary before an alternative collection tube can be implemented? Read answer.

Q&A column

March 2022
Q. Are Pancoast tumors a fast-growing, untreatable cancer? Read answer.
Q. When performing reagent lot-to-lot correlation studies, some staff believe it is better to perform instrument calibration before a new reagent lot check while others believe calibration is not necessary. What is the appropriate practice? Read answer.

Q&A column

February 2022
Q. Are there established benchmarks for such transfusion services quality monitors as C:T ratio, blood product waste, and cancellation of suboptimal specimens? Read answer.
Q. If we collect only enough blood to inoculate one blood culture bottle, should we inoculate the aerobic or anaerobic bottle? Read answer.

Q&A column

January 2022
Q. When reporting reference ranges for absolute differential counts, should the ranges be age specific or is a single reference range acceptable? Read answer.
Q. Is it acceptable to use polystyrene tubes for aliquotting plasma for coagulation tests, such as platelet aggregation, and factor-related studies requiring serial dilutions of plasma? I recall seeing recommendations for using nonpolystyrene tubes for frozen plasma aliquots but did not see a reason for the recommendation. Read answer.

Q&A column

December 2021
Q. We use the CAP Competency Assessment Program to create quizzes to satisfy the problem-solving element of the CAP’s competency assessment requirements. Is there a requirement to create a new quiz each year or can the same quiz be given every year? Is it OK to use the same quiz for the initial competency and the annual competency? Read answer.
Q. Are there red blood cell parameters, such as RBC count or mean corpuscular volume, that can affect a platelet estimate? When determining a platelet estimate, should we always look at the same area of the slide regardless of the patient’s RBC, hematocrit and hemoglobin levels, and indices results? Read answer.

Q&A column

November 2021
Q. I am a nurse in a cardiac cath lab that performs point-of-care testing, including for activated clotting time. At my hospital, the POC testing coordinator only allows other cath lab staff, usually nurses, to use POC testing equipment if they have a copy of their diploma. Can staff who have proof of licensure (such as from the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists) but do not have a copy of their diploma be authorized to use POC testing equipment? Read answer.

Q. I recently joined a hospital laboratory that verifies reagents lot to lot with patient samples using a percentage difference of 10 for all parameters. The hospital lab where I previously worked used a CLIA allowable-error percentage. Is 10 percent allowable error acceptable for reagent lot-to-lot verification for all parameters? Read answer.

Q&A column

October 2021
Q. After naloxone is administered, are opiates still detectable in the body? If so, for how long and in what quantities? Read answer.

Q. Why do proficiency testing specimen results for common immunoassay analytes sometimes vary greatly with different instrument manufacturers and their reagents? Does that mean the patient’s results for the same specimen could vary greatly based on the instrument used? If so, is this acceptable? Wouldn’t the variation in results confuse the clinician and patient? Read answer.

Q&A column

September 2021
Q. What is the ideal collection tube for measuring the level of ammonia in blood? Is a tube containing EDTA suitable?Read answer.
Q. Is there a requirement to notify nursing personnel or doctors about each critical value obtained for a patient after the initial occurrence of the critical result?Read answer.

Q&A column

August 2021
Q. Is it necessary for a lab to report a corrected sodium level when the glucose level is really high? Studies show pseudohyponatremia can occur due to hyperglycemia. How common is this, and how do we decide which correction factor to use? Is it possible that this is easily overlooked by providers due to comorbidities in patients? Some references say there is a need to correct glucose for each 100 mg/dL increase above 400 mg/dL glucose. Read answer.
Q. Payers are limiting reimbursement for PCR respiratory panels to a small subset of tested pathogens and only with certain indications. Many panels available from manufacturers test for more pathogens than can be reimbursed. What is the best approach to deal with this issue? Should large respiratory panels no longer be offered? If a large panel is performed, should only a limited number of pathogen results be reported, even though the entire panel was performed? Should the entire panel be reported but only a limited number of pathogens billed for? Read answer.

MARKETPLACE

TRENDING