Tuesday, November 10, 2026, 1:00 PM-2 PM ET
Join us for a session to help improve diagnostic accuracy in your practice when scoring HER2 IHC 0 with faint, incomplete membrane staining in ≤10% of tumor cells vs IHC 0 with no membrane staining detected in patients with mBC.
Webinar presenter Samuel Caughron, MD, FCAP, Chief Strategy Officer, MAWD Pathology, Medical Director of Laboratory, AdventHealth Kansas City, Medical Director of Laboratory, Labcorp, President, Member & Director, Pathology Ventures, LLC
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is intended for US healthcare professionals. This program is being sponsored by AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Monday, November 16, 2026, 12:30 PM-2 PM ET
Hear experts discuss a multidisciplinary approach to oncopathology for HER2
assessments for solid tumors in the absence of a companion diagnostic.
Webinar presenters Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD, Chair, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Medical Director, Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Emina E. Torlakovic, MD, PhD, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, and Carol Cheung, MD, PhD, JD, FRCPC, Deputy Director, Canadian Biomarker Quality, Assurance—Programme canadien d’assurance de la qualité des biomarqueurs
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Wednesday, November 18, 2026, 12:00 PM-1 PM ET
Join leading pathology experts, Savitri Krishnamurthy, MD, and Marilyn Bui, MD, PhD, for a webinar exploring potential challenges in HER2 IHC testing for breast cancer, emerging evidence supporting digital and computational pathology as assistive tools for pathologists in HER2 IHC assessment, and practical considerations for real-world implementation and adoption.
Webinar presenters Savitri Krishnamurthy, MD, Professor of Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Marilyn Bui, MD, PhD, Surgical Pathologist and Cytopathologist Member and Professor, Departments of Pathology, Machine Learning, and Translational Pathology, Scientific Director, Analytic Microscopy Core Chair, Women in Oncology Executive Board Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speakers are being compensated for their presentations. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME credit.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Wednesday, December 9, 2026, 12 PM-1 PM ET
Hear an expert pathologist discuss the role of HER2 IHC testing and scoring in solid tumors including endometrial, ovarian, cervical, bladder, non-small cell lung, colorectal, and biliary cancers
Webinar presenter Michelle Shiller, DO, MSPT, Baylor Sammons Cancer Center; Fulgent Genetics; Texas Cancer Interception Institute
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is intended for US healthcare professionals. This program is being sponsored by AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
August 2023—Cytology gynecologic statistical laboratory data must be analyzed in the context of changing screening modalities and patient populations. This is especially important with the increasing use of primary high-risk HPV screening because diagnostic metrics will be markedly different in that patient population.
August 2023—Accurate and timely diagnosis is the cornerstone of effective patient care, particularly in the field of pulmonary pathology. To address the challenges health care professionals face in diagnosing and reporting respiratory conditions, the International Academy of Cytology, together with the International Agency for Research on Cancer, recently developed the World Health Organization Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology
May 2023—Standardized reporting systems have been developed during the past decade for cytopathology of different organ systems including the pancreaticobiliary system. The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) in 2014 published the first reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytology. Studies have demonstrated that implementation of the PSC reporting system has significantly reduced the number of “atypical” interpretations and increased the number of specific diagnoses.
May 2023—In the first article in our series on adequacy in cytology, published in January 2023 (bit.ly/3MDNVzr), we summarized current approaches to defining adequacy for the purpose of primary diagnosis in the majority of specimen types encountered routinely in cytology practice. As we saw, while the essence of adequacy is constant across reporting systems, the technical definitions can vary significantly by specimen type.
January 2023—The definition of “adequate” per the Merriam-Webster dictionary is “sufficient for a specific need.” In cytopathology, it is defined by the quantity and quality of the cellular material sampled. The final interpretation of a cytopathology report is almost universally preceded by an adequacy statement. While the essence of “adequacy” stays the same, its application varies depending on the specimen type and the site sampled. Furthermore, in the current era of personalized medicine, the definition of adequacy has expanded from “enough cells to make a morphologic diagnosis” to “enough cells to make a diagnosis and perform ancillary studies.”
January 2023—In recent years, a standardized classification system for the cytology of serous body cavities has been proposed. The system, known as the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC), published by Ashish Chandra, et al.,1 in 2020, aims to enhance the reproducibility of cytologic diagnoses, thereby facilitating clearer communication with clinicians. The diagnostic categories are as follows: I. Non-Diagnostic; II. Negative for Malignancy; III. Atypia of Undetermined Significance; IV. Suspicious for Malignancy; V. Malignant. Each progressive diagnostic category from I through V carries with it an increasing risk of malignancy. This brief review article aims to highlight the salient points of each diagnostic category and includes discussion of recent publications and our own institutional experience.
August 2022—The protocol for the reporting of cervicovaginal cytology, the first in a series of CAP cytopathology protocols, became available for use in a synoptic format on June 22. This protocol is a collaborative effort, based on input from past and present members of the CAP Cytopathology Committee and prepared in conjunction with the CAP Pathology Electronic Reporting Committee. It was presented via webinar to the CAP House of Delegates on March 31. A two-week open comment period followed; all comments were reviewed and appropriate changes were incorporated into the protocol.
August 2022—The ability to make a definitive diagnosis of mesothelioma on pleural fluid cytology has been questioned and debated for a long time. The 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical guidelines limit the cytological diagnosis of pleural fluid specimens only as an initial screening test for mesothelioma. Monaco, et al., discuss in their article the appropriate use of ancillary studies (immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization studies) to make a definitive diagnosis of mesothelioma in small tissue samples, which are often processed as cell blocks. The authors recommend a stepwise approach starting with immunohistochemistry for BAP1 and, next, MTAP in cases of atypical mesothelial proliferations where the suspicion for malignant mesothelioma is high.
