Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

CAP TODAY webinars

IT in a pandemic year, now and what’s ahead: interfaces, analytics, telepathology—seven weigh in

November 2020—Information technology from a COVID-19 perspective. What has been the impact on IT, and what change is yet to come? That is what seven people who met virtually on Sept. 10 talked about with CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle. They are James Harrison, MD, PhD, of the University of Virginia; J. Mark Tuthill, MD, of Henry Ford; Stephen Hewitt, MD, PhD, of the National Cancer Institute; Bob Dowd of NovoPath; Michelle Del Guercio of Sunquest; Curt Johnson of Orchard; and Brian Gunderson of Roche. You will see here, in the conversation that follows, where their focus is as the crisis continues.

NTRK fusion testing: ups, downs of four methods

November 2019—With two inhibitors approved by the FDA for the treatment of NTRK-fusion-positive solid tumors, the next step is to determine whom to test and how. If the efficacy of the compounds—larotrectinib and entrectinib—were the only thing to consider in implementing a testing algorithm, knowing whom to test would be easy.

Path to importance of PD-L1 status in breast cancer

June 2019—New data support testing patients for their PD-L1 immune cell status when they are diagnosed with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer to determine if they might benefit from a checkpoint inhibitor.

IGHV gene mutation at heart of CLL treatment

May 2019—Chronic lymphocytic leukemia is a neoplasm of small mature B-cells and the most common leukemia diagnosed in adults. Median age of diagnosis is 70 years, but there is a surprisingly large percentage of patients, about 10 percent, who are younger than 55, and it’s not uncommon now to occasionally see CLL patients, about two percent, in their 40s.

Next step? The switch from stool culture to PCR

September 2018—The advantages of moving from stool culture to a molecular platform are many: faster time to results, more accurate pathogen identification, a savings of space and staff time. For Jose Alexander, MD, D(ABMM), SM, MB(ASCP), and colleagues at Florida Hospital Orlando, another plus is being able to adhere to the Infectious Diseases Society of America guideline suggestion that labs use a diagnostic approach that can distinguish O157 from non-O157 E. coli and Shiga toxin 1 from Shiga toxin 2 E. coli.

Molecular lung cancer testing: from guideline to practice

August 2018—Testing turnaround times can affect whether non-small cell lung cancer patients receive an EGFR or ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor when indicated. At disease progression on an EGFR TKI, integrating circulating tumor DNA and tissue-based testing may lessen some of the limitations of each form of testing.

In cervical disease dx, agreement rises with p16 IHC use

April 2018—In analyzing cervical tissue, adjunctive use of p16 IHC with H&E-stained slides improves accuracy and sensitivity, according to the results of the Cervical Tissue Adjunctive Analysis study presented by Thomas C. Wright Jr., MD, in a webinar hosted by CAP TODAY and made possible by an educational grant from Roche Diagnostics.

Pros and cons of carbapenemase detection tests

March 2018—When it comes to diagnostic tests, everyone wants the same thing Lars Westblade, PhD, wants: A unicorn.
“The diagnostic performance of a test is reflected in its sensitivity and specificity,” Dr. Westblade said. “It has to be a very good test. And then we need to think about the speed of the test.” There’s also the cost. When all these factors come together just so, “we get what’s called diagnostic perfection,” he says, or the rare event that Brandi Limbago, PhD, of the CDC calls “a diagnostic unicorn.”

Hemophilia management: Tips on monitoring modified replacement therapies

April 2017—Some modified recombinant factor VIII and IX products for hemophilia prophylaxis show significant reagent-dependent recovery in the one-stage assay, while recovery in the chromogenic assay appears to be more consistent, especially for modified recombinant factor IX. The variable results can lead to over- or underestimating the factor level, warn Stefan Tiefenbacher, PhD, of Colorado Coagulation, and Rajiv K. Pruthi, MBBS, of Mayo Clinic.