Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

March 2019

Wading deeper into liquid biopsy

March 2019—The standard riff for talking about a promising new cancer test should be familiar to anyone within sneezing distance of a laboratory: There’s no one-size-fits-all assay. But if any test were to come close, it would be liquid biopsy. Are clinicians eager to use it? Check. Is it relatively simple to do (check) with fairly quick turnaround times (check)? Does it work for solid and hematological tumors? Check and check. Across multiple specimen types—serum, urine, vitreous fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, stool? Quite likely. Can it be used to characterize patients’ molecular profiles, monitor therapy, assess tumor evolution, identify resistance mechanisms, and detect early disease and minimal/measurable residual disease? Half a dozen checks. Even if liquid biopsy does fall short of a one-size-fits-all assay, it’s doing a reasonable impression of a Swiss Army knife (if not Sergeant Troy’s sword fantastic, for those of you who are Thomas Hardy fans).

 

FDA nudges standards adoption in electronic reporting

March 2019—An interesting medical informatics moment occurred post-9/11 with the delivery of anthrax-poisoned letters to several congressional and news media offices. “There was not a single anthrax test order communicated to the CDC electronically,” says Steven H. Hinrichs, MD.

Practical challenges in peripheral blood smear evaluation

March 2019—Unlike high-count monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis, low-count MBL has a limited chance of progression to CLL and thus there is no need for follow-up. And a definitive diagnosis of T-cell large granulocytic leukemia requires demonstration of clonality.

Labs add safety net to critical values procedure

March 2019—A hypercritical value notification policy at Northwell Health in New York State authorizes the laboratory alone to activate a hospital’s rapid response team when necessary. This is the newest step in a critical value notification process that had been working well—but not quite well enough.

Exploring MALDI-TOF mass spec for mycobacteria

March 2019—The family of Mycobacteriaceae includes the genus Mycobacterium, which includes more than 190 species. These organisms have an unusual cell wall. Those of us who work in mycobacteria laboratories know that the cell wall has a high lipid content that makes these organisms acid fast. Thus they’re acid-fast bacteria.

Can NGS replace routine respiratory testing? Study says not yet

March 2019—A small study performed at the University of Utah found that a next-generation sequencing assay cannot replace routine standard-of-care testing to detect pneumonia in immunocompromised patients and determine their treatment. But it could be ordered when an infection is suspected and all other testing has failed to find the etiology.

AMP case report: FDA-approved DNA blood test for colorectal cancer prompts patient to undergo colonoscopy

March 2019—Colorectal cancer is the third most diagnosed cancer and the second highest cause of cancer mortality in men and women, and in 2016 it accounted for about nine percent of all diagnosed cancers in the United States. When CRC is detected at an early localized stage, the five-year survival rate is 90 percent. With progression to regional disease, five-year survival remains high, at 71 percent.

POC testing roundtable: risks, resources, relationships

March 2019—Infection control and the heavy demands on point-of-care coordinators were among the top concerns that came up in a recent CAP TODAY roundtable on point-of-care glucose testing. Publisher Bob McGonnagle spoke with four POC testing experts: Sharon Geaghan, MD, Cynthia Bowman, MD, Steven Cotten, PhD, and Corinne Fantz, PhD. Here is what they told us.

Semen analysis guide: a benchtop sperm morphology aid

March 2019—CAP Press released late last year its Semen Analysis Benchtop Reference Guide, an illustrated guide with emphasis on sperm morphology. Its 68 laminated pages are divided into sections: specimen collection and macroscopic assessment, sperm count, sperm morphology, and nonsperm cells. Behind the book is the CAP Reproductive Medicine Committee, in particular Erica J. Behnke, PhD, HCLD, of Ohio Fertility Providers, Jacob F. Meyer Jr., PhD, HCLD, of Eastern Virginia Medical School, and Laura L. Nelsen, MD, pathologist and director of cytology at MaineGeneral Medical Center and past chair of and now advisor to the committee.CAP TODAY asked Dr. Nelsen about the benchtop reference guide, sample pages of which appear below. Here is what she told us.

Put It on the Board

Lumipulse G β-Amyloid Ratio test has breakthrough device designation
March 2019—Fujirebio Diagnostics received on Feb. 1 breakthrough device designation from the FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health for its Lumipulse G β-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40) quantitative in vitro diagnostic test. The test uses measurable β-amyloid 1-42 and β-amyloid 1-40 concentrations found in human cerebral spinal fluid and combines those concentrations into a numerical ratio of β-amyloid 1-42/β-amyloid 1-40 to estimate the presence of β-amyloid neuritic plaque pathology in the brain. The Lumipulse G β-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40) combines the results of Lumipulse G β-amyloid 1-42 and β-amyloid 1-40 using the Lumipulse G System. The ratio results are intended to aid in assessing adult patients, ages 50 and over, who present with cognitive impairment and are being evaluated for Alzheimer’s disease and other causes of cognitive decline. The results must be interpreted in conjunction with other diagnostic tools such as neurological examination.