Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.
Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications.
Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.
Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.
Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.
Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy, CEO of mTuitive.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
October 2022—Uterine carcinosarcoma is an aggressive malignancy with few treatment options. A recent clinical trial has shown an increase in progression-free survival in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive serous endometrial carcinomas treated with anti-HER2–targeted therapies.
October 2022—Immune checkpoint inhibitors are cancer treatments that function as an immune checkpoint blockade, strengthening a person’s immune response to a tumor. These medications have revolutionized the treatment of patients with metastatic or unresectable cancers, significantly improving life expectancy.
October 2022
Q. How many blocks should a histotechnologist with multiple responsibilities cut per day in a semiautomated laboratory? Read answer.
Q. Is it acceptable to release results from an analyzer with flags or alarms if a pathologist sends an email instructing to do so, even if the manufacturer’s instructions state that results with flags or alarms should be verified by another method before reporting? I am referring to hematology analyzer auto-differential results with asterisk flags. The emailed instructions from the pathologist are applied to all samples but are not incorporated into our standard operating procedure.
We report auto-differential results that have asterisk flags and then perform a manual differential. The report, therefore, contains two differential results that, when compared, are almost always different clinically and statistically. Read answer.
Q. How useful is an aPTT value if the value falls below the reference interval? Read answer.
October 2022—Cater to your audience, while sage advice, can be a challenging proposition when it comes to choosing a biobank information system. Unlike clinical laboratories, which use lab information systems that tightly link specimen testing results to patient information in the EHR, biobanks need specimen-centric systems that can store and track samples for research purposes. Biobanks, like research laboratories, need the functionality typically found in laboratory information management systems, or LIMS, says Raj Dash, MD, pathologist and director of laboratory informatics strategy, Duke Health.
October 2022—I read with great interest your article “Transgender care, in and beyond the lab” (July 2022). In the article Gabrielle Winston-McPherson, PhD, talks about her desire to improve health outcomes, identify problems in the preanalytical process, develop training material, assemble data and information prior to implementation, address informatics challenges, and ensure proper allocation of limited resources—all of which is laudable and appears to align perfectly with our mission as pathologists. The writer reminds readers that the topic has landed in the middle of court cases, state laws, and policy debates, with “words like ‘controversial,’ ‘issue,’ ‘politics,’ ‘traditional family values,’ and ‘beliefs’ awkwardly mixed in with medical realities.”
October 2022—The Food and Drug Administration has granted approval to Thermo Fisher Scientific’s Oncomine Dx Target Test as a companion diagnostic to aid in selecting patients with RET-fusion-positive locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, RET-fusion-positive advanced or metastatic thyroid cancer, and RET-mutation-positive advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer who may be eligible for treatment with Lilly’s Retevmo (selpercatinib).
September 2022—It may not be the oldest story in the world, but in clinical laboratories it’s an oft-told tale: Tumor meets biomarker; drug meets companion diagnostic; both meet FDA approval; clinicians meet with patients offering new hope—and those in the lab are left trying to figure out how to make it all work. That story is playing out again in the realm of measuring tumor mutational burden. In mid-2020 the FDA approved pembrolizumab as a new treatment option in adult and pediatric patients with TMB-high (≥10 mutations/megabase) solid tumors, as determined by the FDA-approved FoundationOne CDx assay. “That doesn’t sound too controversial, right?” says Alain Borczuk, MD, vice chair of anatomic pathology and director of oncologic pathology, Northwell Health Cancer Institute. “It’s not the only way in, but it’s one of the ways in. If you’re arguing for your patient that this is the biomarker that makes them eligible for the drug, then the next questions will be, What was the number? And what was the test?” And it’s off to the races.
September 2022—Picture a performer juggling tenpins while walking a high wire, knowing that a hurricane looms. Add a safety net that could disappear at any time. That’s a sense of what hospital transfusion services experience in maintaining enough blood products to meet patients’ needs.
September 2022—Which biomarker for heart failure should be used—BNP or NT-proBNP—and does it matter? That’s the question Christopher W. Farnsworth, PhD, set out to answer in his “hot topic” talk (one of a trio) at the AACC meeting in July.
September 2022—A single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T measurement below the limit of quantitation of 6 ng/L is a safe and rapid method to identify a substantial number of patients at low risk for acute myocardial injury and infarction, say the authors of a recently published study.
