Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

2023 Issues

Anatomic pathology selected abstracts

November 2023—Claudin-4 is a sensitive and specific marker for carcinoma in effusion cytology. The authors examined the diagnostic use of claudin-4 versus MOC-31 and Ber-EP4 by comparing their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in differentiating carcinoma from mesothelioma and benign/mesothelial hyperplasia in effusion specimens. They conducted a retrospective study on a cohort of 229 cytology specimens, including 211 effusion fluid and 18 fine-needle aspiration specimens. The cytologic categories included 134 carcinoma, 28 mesothelioma, 46 indefinite (suspicious and atypical), and 21 benign.

Molecular pathology selected abstracts

November 2023—Dilated cardiomyopathy is characterized by dilation and weakening of one or both ventricles combined with impaired contractility. Although several external etiologies are associated with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), a familial form (comprising about half the known cases of DCM) has symptoms that tend to arise in mid-adulthood. Despite the genetic nature of the familial form, little is known about the genetic profile of the disease. Black patients have an increased familial risk of DCM and often have a worse prognosis. The authors conducted a study in which they used genomic ancestry to compare the rare variant genetic architecture of DCM within a diverse patient population.

Q&A column

November 2023
Q. A molecular laboratory received an order from an oncologist for next-generation sequencing testing. The patient’s tissue sample was in the custody of a different laboratory, which has a policy requiring patient consent to release materials for reference lab testing.

The oncologist planned to obtain consent from the patient during a scheduled appointment, but the patient’s condition unexpectedly worsened and the patient could no longer travel for the appointment. Neither the custodial laboratory nor the treating health system have mechanisms for electronic consent.

As a result of the lack of options for obtaining consent remotely and the custodial laboratory’s stringent consent policy, potentially life-altering NGS testing was delayed for more than a month. Is this restrictive approach to releasing patient material for reference laboratory testing supported by CAP guidelines? Read answer.

Q. Is it acceptable to perform weak D testing on a newborn who has an RhD-negative blood type and a positive direct antiglobulin test? We know a positive DAT might cause false-positive results on an Rh test, but can it cause false-negative results? Read answer.

Newsbytes

November 2023—“The best way to have a good idea is to have a lot of ideas,” according to Linus Pauling, a chemist and chemical engineer who, among other accomplishments, helped create a form of synthetic plasma. But when there is no structure in place to nurture those ideas, the result can be “a lot of people focused in a lot of different directions,” says Sky Soom, innovation analyst with Sonora Quest Laboratories.

Put It on the Board

November 2023—Roche announced last month the U.S. launch of its Cobas Connection Modules (CCM) Vertical, the elevator and overhead components of its fully automated and modular CCM system to help low-, mid-, and high-volume laboratories optimize space, productivity, and patient care.

Digital path’s star rises from the mists

October 2023—In living up to its promise as a new technology that will revolutionize clinical care through greater ease, speed, and accuracy of diagnosis, digital pathology has been sluggish. While many analysts, starting at least two decades ago, forecasted that digital pathology would elbow aside glass slides for good, that milestone is still far out of reach. As health economist and chief executive officer of the New York City-based digital pathology company Paige, Andy Moye, PhD, puts it bluntly: “In probably 90 to 95 percent of the cases in the U.S., a pathologist still makes the diagnosis of cancer the way they did it back in 1910: by looking at a glass slide under a microscope.” Mark Lloyd, PhD, vice president of pathology for Fujifilm, says he wouldn’t be surprised to hear that perhaps only five percent to 10 percent of hospitals have moved beyond using only glass slides to offer pathologists digital pathology capability. In fact, Dr. Lloyd thinks those percentages are overstated. What is the market share for the clinical use of digital pathology?

Looking ahead to respiratory virus season

October 2023—With respiratory virus season near, those with a close eye on it in August gave the lay of the land for test algorithms, technologies, and forecasts, even as SARS-CoV-2 and RSV cases were rising in parts of the country.

Fast or comprehensive? Lab offers both for NSCLC

October 2023—For molecular testing in oncology, the choice is often fast or slow. PCR-based platforms are rapid, and comprehensive genomic profiling by next-generation sequencing is slower, and each has its pros and cons.