Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.
Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.
Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.
Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy, CEO of mTuitive.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
June 2020—With release of the latest Q-Probes study, titled “Expression Rates in Invasive Breast Carcinoma,” the CAP Quality Practices Committee fills a gap by providing data collected from a diverse set of 21 U.S. laboratories on the average frequency of various ER, PgR, and HER2 expression results.
June 2020—At NYU Langone Health, pathologists and others typically not seen out front in the fight against COVID-19 became the bridge between families and the floors. When Katherine A. Hochman, MD, associate chair for quality in the Department of Medicine at NYU Langone, contracted a mild case of COVID-19, she finally had a chance to take a step back and think. Before going into quarantine to recover, Dr. Hochman had been on the floors day in and day out attending to COVID-19 patients.
June 2020—Precision medicine in oncology, which today is nearly universally about genetics, needs to move beyond omics and static approaches, Anthony Letai, MD, PhD, professor of medicine at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, said at last year’s meeting of the Association for Molecular Pathology. Dr. Letai reported how his laboratory uses dynamic BH3 profiling, a novel assay that detects BCL2 protein dependence in cancer cells and measures changes in their apoptotic priming, to predict clinical response to therapy. He and others call it functional precision medicine.
June 2020—Testing rates for actionable biomarkers in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients are below where they should be, and the overlap of PD-L1 expression with genomic targets causes confusion for oncologists and patients, said Geoffrey R. Oxnard, MD, oncologist at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, in a recent CAP TODAY webinar.
June 2020—A middle-aged adult presented with shortness of breath and bruising and was found to have leukopenia (WBC 4.16 K/mcL; normal range 4.50–11.00 K/mcL) and anemia (Hgb 7.6 g/dL; normal range 12–16 g/dL) with rouleaux. The hypercellular bone marrow core biopsy (80–90 percent cellularity) contained 90 percent plasma cells of variable morphology, some with prominent nucleoli and occasional binucleate forms.
June 2020—The key lesson for policymakers and hospital administrators stemming from the pandemic is that continuing to cut human and economic resources will create large organizational issues when the entire system of care, including laboratory diagnostics, is challenged by “an enormously amplified volume of tests to manage emergent situations,” write Giuseppe Lippi, MD, of the University of Verona, and Mario Plebani, MD, of University Hospital of Padova, Italy, in an opinion paper published online March 19.
June 2020—I enjoyed the recent roundtable on billing and reimbursement (April 2020), along with the product guide on billing software. As we all know, since that time COVID-19 has taken center stage. Here are some thoughts and predictions to bring your readers up to date. Never before has a nation turned off a large percentage of its health care system overnight. This change has caused a train wreck-like boxcar effect that is rippling through medical billing operations for laboratories and pathology groups.
Published in July:
Reading COVID-19’s signature: lung tissue injury
Alain Charles Borczuk, MD, began his practice of pathology as a resident 28 years ago and has spent quite a bit of his career doing autopsies. But it is this year, during the pandemic, that he’s finding some of the best applications of his autopsy work as he seeks to understand the lung injury patterns in SARS CoV-2, or COVID-19 patients. Read more.
June 2020—Like so many CAP TODAY readers, I have been spending the vast majority of my time working on COVID-19. In Georgia we have the dubious distinction of having a county with one of the highest per capita death rates due to COVID-19 in the country—at least as of early May when I wrote this. Things are moving so fast with this pandemic that by the time you read this, much will have changed.
June 2020—More than 1.7 million new diagnoses of cancer occur in the United States each year, and they are almost exclusively made by pathologists who evaluate patient specimens and issue a written diagnostic report. These patients often are not given the opportunity to talk with the pathologist who made the diagnosis or view their tissue through a microscope. There is little published data on patient-pathologist consultation programs in which patients can review their reports and slides with the pathologist. In addition, the number of patients who may be interested in this service is not known. The authors conducted a study to quantify patients’ interest in patient-pathologist consultation programs and qualitatively analyze their motivations for interest or disinterest.
