Thursday, October 29, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the evolving role of PD-L1 testing in HNSCC and ovarian cancer.
Webinar presenter Georgios Deftereos, MD, Professor of Pathology, Associate Director of the Clinical Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Director of Molecular Cytopathology, University of California, San Francisco
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Agilent.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Tuesday, November 3, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the challenges of detecting NRG1 fusions and how RNA-based testing can support more comprehensive fusion identification in clinical practice.
Webinar presenter Benjamin Weinberg, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine and Attending Physician
specializing in gastrointestinal medical oncology
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Diaceutics.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Tuesday, November 10, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Join us for a session to help improve diagnostic accuracy in your practice when scoring HER2 IHC 0 with faint, incomplete membrane staining in ≤10% of tumor cells vs IHC 0 with no membrane staining detected in patients with mBC.
Webinar presenter Jeffrey Gregg, MD, University of Nevada
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Monday, November 16, 2026, 12:30 PM-2 PM ET
Hear experts discuss a multidisciplinary approach to oncopathology for HER2
assessments for solid tumors in the absence of a companion diagnostic.
Webinar presenters Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD, Chair, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Medical Director, Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Emina E. Torlakovic, MD, PhD, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, and Carol Cheung, MD, PhD, JD, FRCPC, Deputy Director, Canadian Biomarker Quality, Assurance—Programme canadien d’assurance de la qualité des biomarqueurs
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
February 2025—Some of the CAP accreditation program requirements in the 2024 microbiology and transfusion medicine checklists, in the edition released Dec. 26, have been revised to simplify, clarify, and conserve resources. In transfusion, one new requirement was added to define policy requirements for the use of low-titer group O whole blood.
February 2025—Digital pathology, artificial intelligence, and anatomic pathology computer systems—seven participants in a Dec. 10, 2024 online roundtable talked with CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle about their experiences, plans, and predictions. Large academic center practices and small pathology practices—they considered all perspectives. Here is what they told us.
January 2025—In the 2024 edition of the CAP accreditation checklists, released on Dec. 26, laboratories can expect to see small but significant changes to the all common, cytopathology, and microbiology checklists. These revisions and additions are meant to ensure test quality as more laboratories begin to offer primary HPV screening and p16/Ki-67 dual stain triage.
January 2025—Pathology informatics leaders at the University of Michigan are moving in steps to a fully digital practice as they put in place an innovative workflow for primary diagnosis. Fresh off their August launch of the new workflow program within their remodeled histology lab, informatics directors in the pathology department say Michigan Medicine is the first in the U.S. to have radiology and pathology operating in the same shared picture archiving and communication system, or PACS, and to implement the well-established DICOM standard for pathology workflow.
January 2025—The point-of-care checklist in the 2024 accreditation checklist edition, released Dec. 26, now includes requirements on coagulation specimen collection and handling.
January 2025—A study published last year found variability in the variants tested for in the commercial lab DPYD genotyping assays available at the time of the study, underscoring “the importance of comprehensive DPYD genotyping to accurately identify patients with DPD deficiency,” the authors said. Compromised dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency raises a cancer patient’s risk of fluorouracil toxicity.
January 2025—Whether grade group 1 prostate cancer should be renamed to “noncancer” was the center of debate on a CAP podcast last fall led by Gladell P. Paner, MD, in discussion with Ming Zhou, MD, PhD, and Rajal B. Shah, MD. Dr. Paner is professor of pathology and surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, and director of the genitourinary pathology service and of the reproductive endocrinology and infertility laboratory, UChicago Medicine.
January 2025—A clinical laboratory team at Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center took on a point-of-care testing problem common to other hospitals: documentation of critical result notification. At OSU, the documentation rate for point-of-care glucose critical result notification wasn’t high enough, and the team set out to raise it. It’s not sufficient to notify the physician or other provider. “You then have to prove you’re doing this, with documentation that the notification did in fact exist,” said Heather Stieglitz, PhD, D(ABCC), OSU co-director of clinical chemistry and toxicology, in an ADLM point-of-care testing session last summer.
January 2025—Renal mass biopsy has become an indispensable pre-management diagnostic tool, especially as incidental renal masses are increasingly detected with modern imaging techniques. It offers the patient the opportunity to get a definitive diagnosis without necessitating nephrectomy, especially helpful for patients with advanced disease or those who are poor surgical candidates. This is crucial, as certain renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes have significantly different prognostic outcomes and therapeutic implications, making it essential to subtype RCCs in addition to distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. For instance, systemic treatment strategies diverge markedly between clear cell RCC and non-clear cell RCC subtypes, underscoring our role in guiding personalized therapy choices. This article synthesizes key findings and diagnostic challenges most encountered on renal mass biopsy, with a focus on clear cell RCC, clear cell papillary renal cell tumor, TFE3-rearranged RCC, papillary RCC, oncocytoma, and chromophobe RCC.
January 2025—It is well documented that the cytologist/cytotechnologist workforce is diminishing and the number of training programs has declined. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CT participation in gynecologic proficiency testing has decreased by 27 percent since 2005. New board certifications of CTs or specialists in CT(SCT) decreased by about 56 percent over the same period. CT(ASCP) and all SCT(ASCP) certifications are now recognized by the CMS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention per 42 CFR §493.1483.
