Wednesday, August 26, 2026 1 PM-2 PM ET
Learn about digital pathology technology that is future-ready, yet practical for today’s
laboratory needs.
Webinar presenters Scott Hammond, Senior Systems Consultant, Digital Pathology Division, Wexner Medical Center, Department of Pathology, and Ursula Hofer, Imaging Technologist, Pathology Digital Imaging Lab, Wexner Medical Center, Department of Pathology, and Sandra Banky, PA(ASCP), Director of Operations, Wexner Medical Center, Department of Pathology, and Molly Epler, MHI, LSSYB, Clinical Laboratory Manager, Wexner Medical Center.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Wednesday, September 23, 2026. 12 PM-1 PM ET
Roundtable presenters Dr. David Sacks MB, ChB, FRCPath, Chairman, Steering Committee National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP), and Priya Sivaraman, PhD, Senior Technical Product Manager, Tosoh Bioscience.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Thursday, September 24, 2026 11 AM-12 PM CT
This session explores the evolving role of RAS in precision oncology, from the biology of RAS mutations to the expanding landscape of targeted therapies. Through expert presentations, real-world case discussions, and interactive audience polling, participants will examine best practices for RAS biomarker testing across solid tumors, including lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. The session will highlight practical considerations for tissue and liquid biopsy, strategies to address testing gaps, and the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration to ensure timely identification of patients who may benefit from RAS-targeted therapies.
Webinar presenters David Braxton, MD, Chief of Molecular Pathology Services, Hoag Family Cancer Institute & Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, and Carlos Becerra, MD, Research Director for Medical Oncology, Margaret Given Larkin Endowed Chair for Developmental Cancer Therapeutics, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
Wednesday, September 30, 2026. 1 PM-1:30 PM ET
Roundtable presenters John Longshore, PhD, Head of Scientific Affairs, Global Oncology Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, and Flora Berisha, MS, Executive Director, Global Head of Diagnostic Partnering and Development, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, and Mark D. Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations, Diagnostic Molecular Pathology, Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Isabel Preeshagul, DO, MBS, Thoracic Medical Oncologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
February 2023
Q. What is the most specific serologic test for diagnosing IgG4-related disease? Read answer.
Q. Our new endocrine clinic is monitoring estradiol levels in transgender male patients (female to male) and asked if our standard estradiol immunoassay is appropriate to use in this setting. What do you recommend? Read answer.
February 2023—The CAP and three other organizations told the FDA in a Jan. 6 letter they are increasingly concerned that it is not recognizing updated antimicrobial susceptibility interpretive criteria, or breakpoints, in a sufficiently timely manner.
January 2023—Laura Esserman, MD, MBA, can still recall her Eureka moment. She had just seen a talk on residual cancer burden by pathologist W. Fraser Symmans, MB.ChB, a pioneer in the field. “When I saw Fraser present this,” says Dr. Esserman, director, University of California San Francisco Breast Care Center, “I knew immediately that MRI would work and that residual cancer burden would complement it. MRI was basically a snapshot of RCB over time. I realized that we had to institute RCB—we had to standardize our approach.” Until then, she and her colleagues across the I-SPY trial sites relied on individual pathologist assessment for each case. The pathologic complete response rate, or pCR, hovered at about 34 percent. That insight was soon followed by another. Intrigued by what she heard, Dr. Esserman and her pathologist colleagues from all the I-SPY sites traveled to MD Anderson, where Dr. Symmans helped develop the residual cancer burden system, for training.
January 2023—Guidelines for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease, published in 2021, have raised questions about which von Willebrand factor activity assay laboratories should use.
January 2023—For the central microbiology laboratory serving Barnes-Jewish and four other hospitals in the St. Louis area, validating and implementing a new blood culture system and moving to a shorter incubation time came at a perfect time: right before the pandemic.
January 2023—Respiratory viruses were up in most states when Compass Group members met online Dec. 6 with CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle, and some were looking to centralize their now decentralized rapid molecular testing. At least one system had already done so. In California, a new law requires fentanyl screening be included in drug screens in all general acute-care hospital lab settings.
January 2023—Due out this spring is the CAP’s Color Atlas of Flow Cytometry. It consists of 71 cases and provides examples of the full range of hematolymphoid diseases that can be productively analyzed by flow cytometric immunophenotyping. Its editors are David Dorfman, MD, PhD, of Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital; William Karlon, MD, PhD, of the University of California San Francisco Medical Center; and Michael Linden, MD, PhD, of M Health Fairview-University of Minnesota Medical Center. CAP TODAY recently asked Dr. Dorfman a few questions about the atlas. His answers to our questions and a sample case follow.
January 2023—The definition of “adequate” per the Merriam-Webster dictionary is “sufficient for a specific need.” In cytopathology, it is defined by the quantity and quality of the cellular material sampled. The final interpretation of a cytopathology report is almost universally preceded by an adequacy statement. While the essence of “adequacy” stays the same, its application varies depending on the specimen type and the site sampled. Furthermore, in the current era of personalized medicine, the definition of adequacy has expanded from “enough cells to make a morphologic diagnosis” to “enough cells to make a diagnosis and perform ancillary studies.”
January 2023—In recent years, a standardized classification system for the cytology of serous body cavities has been proposed. The system, known as the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC), published by Ashish Chandra, et al.,1 in 2020, aims to enhance the reproducibility of cytologic diagnoses, thereby facilitating clearer communication with clinicians. The diagnostic categories are as follows: I. Non-Diagnostic; II. Negative for Malignancy; III. Atypia of Undetermined Significance; IV. Suspicious for Malignancy; V. Malignant. Each progressive diagnostic category from I through V carries with it an increasing risk of malignancy. This brief review article aims to highlight the salient points of each diagnostic category and includes discussion of recent publications and our own institutional experience.
January 2023—Automation and point-of-care, reflex, and viscoelastic testing were some of what came up when a group spoke with CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle in late November about hemostasis testing. Also tossed in: Results reporting to the EHR, which “can always be improved,” said Eric Salazar, MD, PhD, of University of Texas Health San Antonio. And D-dimer, one of the pandemic’s “health care heroes,” said Nichole Howard of Diagnostica Stago. Here’s what they said about all that and more.
