Linkedin Youtube
Launch Digital Edition

Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Register Now

Wednesday, September 23, 2026. 12 PM-1 PM ET
Roundtable presenters Dr. David Sacks MB, ChB, FRCPath, Chairman, Steering Committee National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP), and Priya Sivaraman, PhD, Senior Technical Product Manager, Tosoh Bioscience

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The roundtable is made possible by a special educational grant from Tosoh Bioscience Inc.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Thursday, September 24, 2026 11 AM-12 PM CT
This session explores the evolving role of RAS in precision oncology, from the biology of RAS mutations to the expanding landscape of targeted therapies. Through expert presentations, real-world case discussions, and interactive audience polling, participants will examine best practices for RAS biomarker testing across solid tumors, including lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. The session will highlight practical considerations for tissue and liquid biopsy, strategies to address testing gaps, and the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration to ensure timely identification of patients who may benefit from RAS-targeted therapies.

Webinar presenters David Braxton, MD, Chief of Molecular Pathology Services, Hoag Family Cancer Institute & Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, and Carlos Becerra, MD, Research Director for Medical Oncology, Margaret Given Larkin Endowed Chair for Developmental Cancer Therapeutics, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from OncoLens and Diaceutics.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Wednesday, September 30, 2026. 1 PM-1:30 PM ET
Roundtable presenters John Longshore, PhD, Head of Scientific Affairs, Global Oncology Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, and Flora Berisha, MS, Executive Director, Global Head of Diagnostic Partnering and Development, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, and Mark D. Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations, Diagnostic Molecular Pathology, Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Isabel Preeshagul, DO, MBS, Thoracic Medical Oncologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The roundtable is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Thursday, October 1, 2026 1 PM-2 PM ET
This presentation will explore the value of in-house CGP, offer insights into the benefits and drawbacks of incorporation, and provide information about important practical factors when considering in-house implementation of CGP.

Webinar presenter Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun, MD, PhD, FCAP, Medical Director, Molecular Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine Laboratory, Director, Division of Diagnostic Molecular Pathology and Human Genetics, Henry F. Krous Professor of Pathology, University of Nebraska Medical Center

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Illumina.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Tuesday, October 20, 2026 11 AM-12 PM ET
Hear experts review the biological and clinical significance of the HER2 expression continuum in breast tissue, providing a clearer understanding of how these variations might impact diagnosis, and discuss the emerging importance of documenting HER2-low and HER2-ultralow categories using a validated IHC assay.

Webinar presenters Keith Wharton, MD, PhD, Global Medical Affairs Leader–Pathology, Roche Diagnostics Solutions, and Hannah Y. Wen, MD, PhD, Director, Breast Pathology Fellowship, Associate Team Leader, Breast Pathology Team, Attending Pathologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Roche.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Tuesday, November 3, 2026 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the challenges of detecting NRG1 fusions and how RNA-based testing can support more comprehensive fusion identification in clinical practice.

Webinar presenter Benjamin Weinberg, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine and Attending Physician
specializing in gastrointestinal medical oncology

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Diaceutics.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

Columns

Clinical Pathology Selected Abstracts

June 2020—More than 1.7 million new diagnoses of cancer occur in the United States each year, and they are almost exclusively made by pathologists who evaluate patient specimens and issue a written diagnostic report. These patients often are not given the opportunity to talk with the pathologist who made the diagnosis or view their tissue through a microscope. There is little published data on patient-pathologist consultation programs in which patients can review their reports and slides with the pathologist. In addition, the number of patients who may be interested in this service is not known. The authors conducted a study to quantify patients’ interest in patient-pathologist consultation programs and qualitatively analyze their motivations for interest or disinterest.

Anatomic Pathology Selected Abstracts

June 2020—The authors conducted a study in which they independently evaluated the utility and prognostic value of tumor budding according to International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) criteria in a large well-characterized European gastric cancer cohort. They assessed tumor budding according to the ITBCC criteria for 456 consecutive, surgically treated gastric cancers using the scoring system Bd0 (no buds), Bd1 (one to four buds), Bd2 (five to nine buds), and Bd3 (10 or more buds). Cases with tumor budding were divided into low-budding (Bd1/Bd2) and high-budding (Bd3) groups. The tumor budding score was analyzed in relation to clinicopathological parameters, overall survival, and tumor-specific survival. The authors found that 115 (25.2 percent) cases had no tumor budding, 104 (22.8 percent) had low tumor budding, and 237 (52 percent) had high tumor budding.

Molecular Pathology Selected Abstracts

June 2020—The COVID-19 pandemic has focused the world’s attention on using sensitive high-throughput molecular diagnostic testing for the SARS-CoV-2 virus as a public health tool for “flattening the curve” of the infection. Although initial shortages of specialized polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing reagents that plagued the early weeks of the pandemic have slowly improved (as of CAP TODAY press time), an obstacle to universal testing continues to be the first-step bottleneck of collecting respiratory tract samples for virus-specific reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) testing. The traditional gold standard sample for COVID-19 testing has been a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab. However, nationwide shortages of NP swabs, personal protective equipment (PPE), and viral transport media have intermittently delayed the testing process. In an attempt to alleviate these critical sample-collection issues and promote more widespread testing, the medical community and other entities have been investigating alternative sample-collection procedures.

Q&A column

Q. Are there high-specificity IHC stains for diagnosing mesothelioma that differ from those recommended in the “Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma: 2012 update of the consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group”? Read answer.
Q. For our hospital tissue and blood committee, we would like to expand the tissue component to look at more preoperative versus postoperative diagnoses (acute appendicitis, for example) and anything else that should be evaluated, such as adequacy of tissue and blood samples. Is there a resource that provides a list of tissue-related quality metrics that we can evaluate?
Read answer.

Newsbytes

June 2020—The global market for health care chatbots has been growing at a fairly rapid pace in recent years, but “COVID-19 is the thing that’s going to make chatbots mainstream,” says Greg Kefer, chief marketing officer at the chatbot company LifeLink Health. A 2019 Allied Market Research report, released just months prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, projected the health care chatbot industry would reach $345.3 million by 2026, a steep rise from 2018, when it garnered $116.9 million (www.allied​market​research.​com/healthcare-chatbots-market). But now, the COVID-19 pandemic has put into sharp relief one of the key value propositions of chatbots—unlimited scale, which means the timeline for adoption “just got massively compressed,” says Kefer, whose software-as-a-service company develops enterprise-level chatbots for large health care organizations.

Put It on the Board

Better cancer diagnostics at core of Future of Pathology report
June 2020—Leica Biosystems launched in April The Future of Pathology Expert Report written by an international panel of pathologists in consultation with health care executives, cancer stakeholders, and pathology leaders. In the report, each member of the panel—Tiffany Graham, MD, and Jerad Gardner, MD, in the U.S., and Bethany Williams, MBBS, PhD, and Matthew Clarke, MBBS, in the U.K.—addresses one of four subjects: pathology education, digital pathology and artificial intelligence, improving perceptions of pathology, and molecular pathology. The theme of the report (available at www.thefutureofpathology.com) is improving and transforming cancer diagnostics.

Put it on the Board

Clinical research registry aims to answer crucial COVID-19 questions May 2020—A Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes Registry was launched April 13 to unite health care workers in the U.S. for rapid-cycle research. The goals of the so-called HERO registry are to engage workers in a research community, understand their experiences, and track outcomes associated with caring for patients with COVID-19. The HERO research program, led by Duke Clinical Research Institute, part of Duke University School of Medicine, leverages the

From the President’s Desk: Heroes in the COVID-19 pandemic

May 2020—The most pressing topic in pathology today is the COVID-19 pandemic. Because this column must be written a few weeks before it is printed and delivered to readers, anything I write in April will be out of date by the time you see it. Numbers will be wrong, and comments on testing methodology will be obsolete. Instead, I’ll focus on the bigger picture. As we watch the world’s response to the pandemic, I am proud to be a physician and a pathologist. I am honored to work with phenomenal laboratory personnel, and this is by no means unique to me. Across the medical community, we have seen people come together for a shared mission in ways we have never experienced before. The demands on our laboratories are tremendous, and we are rising to the challenges of producing tests and directing therapies under conditions we have not seen before.

Newsbytes

May 2020—Imagine the potential educational benefits of pathology residents being able to see the precise path that the eyes of experienced pathologists take as they scan a whole slide image. Preliminary research has suggested that showing residents visual representations of a pathologist’s eye-tracking movement overlaid over a whole slide image can impact how they learn, says Sharon E. Fox, MD, PhD, a pathologist at the Southeast Louisiana Veterans Healthcare System and associate director of research and development, Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center.

Clinical Pathology Selected Abstracts

May 2020—Laboratory costs represent approximately three to four percent of overall health care expenses but drive 70 to 80 percent of decisions made by physicians. One way to control laboratory testing expenditures is through appropriate utilization. For example, thyroid and antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing have reliable initial screening tests, yet specialized testing is overutilized for both. In 2000 guidelines, the College of American Pathologists and American College of Rheumatology established that the ANA screen by immunofluorescence in the setting of a negative result is sufficiently sensitive not to perform further testing with subserologies and that thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is a sensitive marker of thyroid function and can often be used without further testing with a normal TSH.

MARKETPLACE

TRENDING