Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, October 20, 2026, 11 AM-12 PM ET
Hear experts review the biological and clinical significance of the HER2 expression continuum in breast tissue, providing a clearer understanding of how these variations might impact diagnosis, and discuss the emerging importance of documenting HER2-low and HER2-ultralow categories using a validated IHC assay.

Webinar presenters Keith Wharton, MD, PhD, Global Medical Affairs Leader–Pathology, Roche Diagnostics Solutions, and Hannah Y. Wen, MD, PhD, Director, Breast Pathology Fellowship, Associate Team Leader, Breast Pathology Team, Attending Pathologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Roche.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Thursday, October 29, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the evolving role of PD-L1 testing in HNSCC and ovarian cancer.

Webinar presenter Georgios Deftereos, MD, Professor of Pathology, Associate Director of the Clinical Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Director of Molecular Cytopathology, University of California, San Francisco

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Agilent.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Tuesday, November 3, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the challenges of detecting NRG1 fusions and how RNA-based testing can support more comprehensive fusion identification in clinical practice.

Webinar presenter Benjamin Weinberg, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine and Attending Physician
specializing in gastrointestinal medical oncology

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Diaceutics.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Tuesday, November 10, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Join us for a session to help improve diagnostic accuracy in your practice when scoring HER2 IHC 0 with faint, incomplete membrane staining in ≤10% of tumor cells vs IHC 0 with no membrane staining detected in patients with mBC.

Webinar presenter Jeffrey Gregg, MD, University of Nevada

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Monday, November 16, 2026, 12:30 PM-2 PM ET
Hear experts discuss a multidisciplinary approach to oncopathology for HER2
assessments for solid tumors in the absence of a companion diagnostic.

Webinar presenters Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD, Chair, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Medical Director, Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Emina E. Torlakovic, MD, PhD, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, and Carol Cheung, MD, PhD, JD, FRCPC, Deputy Director, Canadian Biomarker Quality, Assurance—Programme canadien d’assurance de la qualité des biomarqueurs

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

November 2020

Making peace with saliva, pooled testing

November 2020—Adam Barker, PhD, D(ABMM), was ready to call it quits. For weeks, he had been working to bring saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 testing to ARUP Laboratories and the University of Utah. Dr. Barker, director of ARUP’s COVID-19 rapid response lab, and his colleagues had done studies comparing saliva with nasopharyngeal swabs, which seemed to be following the flight of the passenger pigeon out of existence. They had wrestled with the FDA over emergency use authorization. They’d developed their own transport media, since that supply was also becoming extinct. He had begun building kits for saliva collection and figured out what sample size worked best. Kits had been delivered to collection sites on campus, and staff were being trained in their use. He was, in other words, creating a laboratory success story, one of the many that have been written since March. He was not basking in this fact. “I have to tell you: I lost so much sleep because of saliva,” says Dr. Barker, who is also director, ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology.

Checklist, CLIA line up on COVID reporting

November 2020—It’s been well understood since the Ten Commandments that rules that appear simple in theory can be fiendishly complex or even impossible to execute. The pandemic is providing a perfect example of that in the laboratory world, but with added twists, at least for now.

Three at AACC: rapid STI testing, toxicology, biosafety

November 2020—Point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted infections, toxicology investigation, and biosafety practices are three of the hundreds of topics that will come online next month during AACC’s virtual annual meeting.

Fewer urine cultures — series of changes add up

November 2020—Five years after putting in place a urine reflex algorithm at Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, and many tweaks later, Melanie Yarbrough, PhD, D(ABMM), D(ABCC), has tips to share on how to increase the odds for success in reducing the number of urine cultures.

At POC and in lab, 2 new checks on SARS-CoV-2 testing

November 2020—The CAP released in September its proficiency testing program for SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing, with the first shipment to laboratories set for Nov. 30. It also introduced recently a Quality Cross Check program that makes it possible for labs performing nucleic acid amplification testing for SARS-CoV-2 to monitor performance across multiple instruments, in compliance with the CMS directive prohibiting proficiency testing on multiple instruments.

Compass on COVID: What test for whom and when—lab leaders talk

November 2020—Testing saliva, stocking up, and expanding capacity were top of mind when members of the Compass Group convened by Zoom on Sept. 1 for a second COVID-19-related call with CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle. Antigen testing, too, came up, and the question to answer there, said Susan Fuhrman, MD, of OhioHealth, is why the test is performed and what will be done with the result. That and more—testing for patients undergoing treatment for cancer, flu season—were up for discussion. Others on the call were Greg Sossaman, MD, of Ochsner; Lauren Anthony, MD, and Heather Dawson of Allina; Sarah Province and Julie Hess of AdventHealth; James Crawford, MD, PhD, of Northwell; Stan Schofield and Robert Carlson, MD, of MaineHealth; Sterling Bennett, MD, MS, of Intermountain; John Carey, MD, of Henry Ford; and Pamela Murphy, PhD, APRN, of MUSC Health. The Compass Group is an organization of not-for-profit IDN system lab leaders who collaborate to identify and share best practices and strategies. (For our coverage of their first call with CAP TODAY, see “Compass points chart the pandemic,” September 2020.) Here is what they told us on Sept. 1.

 

IT in a pandemic year, now and what’s ahead: interfaces, analytics, telepathology—seven weigh in

November 2020—Information technology from a COVID-19 perspective. What has been the impact on IT, and what change is yet to come? That is what seven people who met virtually on Sept. 10 talked about with CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle. They are James Harrison, MD, PhD, of the University of Virginia; J. Mark Tuthill, MD, of Henry Ford; Stephen Hewitt, MD, PhD, of the National Cancer Institute; Bob Dowd of NovoPath; Michelle Del Guercio of Sunquest; Curt Johnson of Orchard; and Brian Gunderson of Roche. You will see here, in the conversation that follows, where their focus is as the crisis continues.

AMP case report: Role of lymphoma sequencing panel in diagnosis of pediatric-type follicular lymphoma

November 2020—Pediatric-type follicular lymphoma (PTFL) is a rare form of lymphoma that was recognized as a new diagnostic entity in the revised 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. The classic features of PTFL include male predominance, localized stage I lymphadenopathy, blastoid morphology, high proliferation index, and exceedingly good response rate to local excision.

From the President’s Desk: Gratitude all around

November 2020—Despite the circumstances that forced us to shift to a virtual event for our annual meeting this year—and my sincere hope we will never have to do so again—I couldn’t be more proud of how everyone in the CAP worked hard to adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic and ensure the best experience possible for all of our pathologists. As I write this, the annual meeting has just concluded. While every conference we hold requires tremendous effort, this was a different event, a different horse race. The work and persistence that went into making our virtual meeting a success were extraordinary.

Clinical pathology selected abstracts

November 2020—Smoking is a leading cause of death in the United States and is associated with many postoperative complications, including increased transfusion needs. Toxins in tobacco that create free radicals that damage the arterial walls and make them more susceptible to rupture and bleeding may be the link between smoking and surgical bleeding. Smoking also impairs tissue healing after surgery, most likely due to reduced oxygenation and altered function of inflammatory cells during the healing process. This may impact bleeding risk in the immediate postoperative period. The authors conducted a study in which they queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Participant Use Data File 2007–2016, which contained data from up to 680 U.S. hospitals, to test the hypothesis that smoking is associated with a higher risk of bleeding in various surgical procedures.