Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.

Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications. 

Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.

Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.

Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy,  CEO of mTuitive.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

Subspecialties

AMP case report: Acute myeloid leukemia with hyperdiploidy

March 2024—CAP TODAY and the Association for Molecular Pathology have teamed up to bring molecular case reports to CAP TODAY readers. AMP members write the reports using clinical cases from their own practices that show molecular testing’s important role in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. This month’s report comes from Aga Khan University in Karachi, Pakistan. Case. An 87-year-old male with a clinical history of hypertension and sick sinus syndrome presented with a one-month history of fever, generalized weakness, and weight loss. There was no lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly on physical examination. Bone marrow examination was performed to evaluate for cytopenias.

Acute myeloid leukemia with hyperdiploidy

March 2024—CAP TODAY and the Association for Molecular Pathology have teamed up to bring molecular case reports to CAP TODAY readers. AMP members write the reports using clinical cases from their own practices that show molecular testing’s important role in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. This month’s report comes from Aga Khan University in Karachi, Pakistan. Case. An 87-year-old male with a clinical history of hypertension and sick sinus syndrome presented with a one-month history of fever, generalized weakness, and weight loss. There was no lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly on physical examination. Bone marrow examination was performed to evaluate for cytopenias.

In urinalysis, compromises, collections, and rules

March 2024—Reflex criteria, middleware, bladder cancer screening, point of care, controls, and collections came up in CAP TODAY’s Jan. 16 roundtable on urinalysis. Six people weighed in, with CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle leading. Their take on where things stand and where they can be better follows. CAP TODAY’s guide to urinalysis instrumentation begins here. Tim Skelton, in last year’s urinalysis roundtable we spoke about the need for reflex testing. One of our roundtable participants said that without reflex testing,

Doing more, doing better in bladder cancer

February 2024—From her vantage at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Donna Hansel, MD, PhD, has a clear view of cancer’s latest frontiers. Progress and breakthroughs are the norm. But even she sounds impressed when she surveys the changes in her specialty, urothelial cancer. “We are now thinking what we never before thought was possible: We are thinking about cures and lifelong remission from disease,” says Dr. Hansel, division head and professor of pathology and laboratory medicine. It’s been a long time coming, says Dr. Hansel, who is also the Dr. Eva Lotzova and Peter Lotz memorial research chair. The disease historically has been caught in a sort of prepositional triangle—underfunded, overlooked, and underdiagnosed—with serious consequences. For years, she says, “We thought bladder cancer had only one treatment”—BCG, or Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, therapy. Because the field lacked a large volume of research to propel better diagnostics and treatments, “people died of this disease because it progressed.”

As AI use expands, ethics at the leading edge

February 2024—Artificial intelligence is sizzling, so much so that New Yorker magazine, evoking the dazzling and the potentially devouring nature of AI technology, tagged 2023 as “The Year A.I. Ate the Internet.”

Biomarker tests with discrepant results—why the differences?

February 2024—When multimodality testing reveals discordant biomarker results, which method is correct? Annette S. Kim, MD, PhD, and JinJuan Yao, MD, PhD, in a CAP23 session last fall used their cases to share strategies for resolving discrepancies—or, in some cases, what look like discrepancies.

With pipeline for pathologists, others lacking, eyes on AI

February 2024—Artificial intelligence and Medicare Advantage contracts were at the center of the Jan. 2 Compass Group virtual roundtable led by CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle. “If you want to get into the AI world, there are many lanes you can swim in,” said Michael Feldman, MD, PhD, of Indiana University School of Medicine.

The race to keep pace with drug use changes

February 2024—Xylazine prevalence, lab-developed testing, and new technology are converging at Yale New Haven Health in a way that gives rise to questions, worry, and new hope for faster drug testing.

AP and CP reporting—the needs, the caveats

February 2024—Anatomic and clinical pathology reporting—what’s working, what’s missing. Three pathologists (all board certified in informatics) and representatives of three information system companies met online Dec. 19 with CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle to talk about reporting needs, the changes, what’s optimal. The first half of their discussion begins here; the second half will be published in the March issue.

More progress, fewer barriers for PGx testing

January 2024—Sometimes even superb ideas can also turn out to be quite, well, bothersome. Zoom meetings. Bridal showers. Bike lanes. Parking apps. QR menu codes. And—if laboratories aren’t careful—the same can be true of pharmacogenomic testing. Just ask Ann Moyer, MD, PhD, associate professor, laboratory medicine and pathology, Mayo Clinic. When it comes to pharmacogenomic testing, laboratory medicine brings significant expertise to the table. But in clinical settings, physicians who prescribe the medications need to be familiar with how to use the test results. They also need to work with the lab to decide which tests, for which genes or gene-drug pairs, will be most helpful for their patients, she says. “Especially if you’re going to start incorporating clinical support alerts into the EHR,” adds Dr. Moyer, who was chair of (until Dec. 31; she is now advisor to) the CAP/ACMG Biochemical and Molecular Genetics Committee. “If the practice doesn’t actually want them, then you’re just going to end up annoying them.”