Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Thursday, October 29, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the evolving role of PD-L1 testing in HNSCC and ovarian cancer.

Webinar presenter Georgios Deftereos, MD, Professor of Pathology, Associate Director of the Clinical Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Director of Molecular Cytopathology, University of California, San Francisco

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Agilent.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Tuesday, November 3, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss the challenges of detecting NRG1 fusions and how RNA-based testing can support more comprehensive fusion identification in clinical practice.

Webinar presenter Benjamin Weinberg, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine and Attending Physician
specializing in gastrointestinal medical oncology

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Diaceutics.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Tuesday, November 10, 2026, 1 PM-2 PM ET
Join us for a session to help improve diagnostic accuracy in your practice when scoring HER2 IHC 0 with faint, incomplete membrane staining in ≤10% of tumor cells vs IHC 0 with no membrane staining detected in patients with mBC.

Webinar presenter Jeffrey Gregg, MD, University of Nevada

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Monday, November 16, 2026, 12:30 PM-2 PM ET
Hear experts discuss a multidisciplinary approach to oncopathology for HER2
assessments for solid tumors in the absence of a companion diagnostic.

Webinar presenters Funda Meric-Bernstam, MD, Chair, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Medical Director, Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Emina E. Torlakovic, MD, PhD, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, and Carol Cheung, MD, PhD, JD, FRCPC, Deputy Director, Canadian Biomarker Quality, Assurance—Programme canadien d’assurance de la qualité des biomarqueurs

CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. This program is being sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca. The speaker is being compensated for the presentation. The program is not CME accredited and may not be used for CME accreditation.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

Manage Subscription

To receive CAP TODAY magazine, please subscribe here.
For change of address, mail new information to: CAP TODAY Circulation, 325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, IL 60093-2750 or visit here.

Subspecialties

AP lab panel on LDTs, digital path, workforce

August 2024—Digital pathology, FDA oversight of laboratory-developed tests, and the workforce shortage took center stage when CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle convened a roundtable online to talk about anatomic pathology laboratories. The shortage of pathologists, in particular, “is even greater than one might realize because of generational expectations around work-life balance,” said Andrew Bellizzi, MD, who applauds such balance but notes its significance. Their June 18 conversation follows.

Cytopathology in focus—Use of cytologic material for ancillary studies in respiratory pathology: Begin with the end in mind

August 2024—Case. A 58-year-old female patient undergoes robotic endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for a peripherally located right upper lobe stellate-shaped lung lesion with ground-glass opacification. Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) assessments were adequate on four Diff-Quik (DQ) smears that were prepared for evaluation. One slide was cover-slipped for diagnostic purposes and the remaining slides were retained, uncovered. The cytopathologist requested additional material for further ancillary studies. The needle was rinsed in CytoLyt solution used to prepare a cell block from the cell pellet, and the residual supernatant was stored (at -80°C) for possible future molecular studies. The cell block cellularity was adequate, and the malignant cell population represented 50 percent of the sampled cells.

Cytopathology in focus: Reporting salivary gland cytopathology—what’s new in Milan ed. 2?

August 2024—The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a widely endorsed and increasingly adopted standardized reporting system for salivary gland fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens. The inaugural edition published in 2018 was inspired by the Bethesda cervicovaginal and thyroid reporting systems. The MSRSGC sought to facilitate clear and consistent communication between pathologists and the clinical team, thereby enhancing patient-centered decision-making and therapeutic interventions and assisting inter- and intralaboratory comparisons.

Cytopathology in focus—Low-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in small samples: Grading challenges

August 2024—Two to five percent of pancreatic tumors are pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, of which more than 90 percent are well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). The current World Health Organization classification stratifies PanNETs into three histological grades based on mitotic count and Ki-67 proliferation index. Low-grade PanNETs (grades one and two) are morphologically indistinguishable and have characteristic neuroendocrine cytomorphologic features: a dispersed/loosely cohesive smear pattern composed of small-to-medium monomorphic cells with occasional plasmacytoid appearance; amphophilic, granular, or vacuolated cytoplasm; round nuclei; and coarse salt-and-pepper chromatin.

Digging into the interpretation of TSH results

Charna Albert May 2024—In a time of wellness testing and high rates of levothyroxine prescribing for hypothyroidism, it may also be time to rethink TSH test result interpretation. Laboratory testing is more accessible now than it used to be and patients are more involved in their own care. “You’re trying to give the patient access and ability to take care of their own health. But the double-edged sword is you can start over-ordering things, and the way we’ve designed lab

Labs juggle string of LDT unknowns

July 2024—Like a long-awaited second act, the FDA’s final rule regulating laboratory-developed tests as medical devices took the stage this spring. As with any FDA performance, this one opened to mixed reviews.

The spring curtain-raising followed the earlier proposed rule from last October, which drew some 6,500 responses during the public comment period. If that was an out-of-town tryout, no one quite knew what to expect from the rewrite, or if there would even be one.

As it turns out, there were indeed changes, but they didn’t necessarily bring clarity. As Jane Pine Wood, counsel for McDonald Hopkins, puts it, the final rule “certainly raised a whole lot more questions than it answered.”

The rule calls for a four-year, five-stage phaseout policy with the FDA enacting greater oversight of in vitro diagnostic products that are offered as LDTs.

Stage one, beginning on May 6, 2025, calls for labs to comply with medical device reporting requirements, correction and removal reporting requirements, and quality system requirements regarding complaint files.

HPV test self-collection set in motion

July 2024—With the Food and Drug Administration approval in May of two HPV self-collection devices for use in clinic settings, physicians in and out of the laboratory are optimistic the approach can reach underscreened patients, even if FDA approval is only a first step.

Mayo pathologists create and test their own AI algorithms

July 2024—A Mayo Clinic project is “democratizing artificial intelligence,” its leaders say, by enabling pathologists with varying levels of AI expertise—most of whom had never before participated in an AI project—to create and implement algorithms.

Recommendations issued on PD-L1, TMB testing

July 2024—In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, a validated PD-L1 immunohistochemistry expression assay should be used, with other targetable genomic biomarker assays where appropriate, for the selection of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. And the appropriate validation should be performed on all specimen types and fixatives. Those are two of the six recommendations of the CAP, Association for Molecular Pathology, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Pulmonary Pathology Society, and LUNGevity Foundation, released in April and now in print in their PD-L1 and tumor mutation burden testing guideline for the selection of such therapies.

Lab 2.0, Medicare 2030, AI—how they come together

July 2024—The term value-based care is spoken of often, but what part do laboratories play in it and how can they be paid for it? What is Medicare 2030, and what does it mean for laboratories? How can AI be used to practice the medicine of tomorrow? Myra Wilkerson, MD, in speaking in May at the Pathology Informatics Summit, answered these and other questions. She is chair of the Department of Laboratory Medicine and of the Diagnostic Medicine Institute at Geisinger Health in Danville, Pa. She is a founding member of the Project Santa Fe Foundation, for which she serves on its board and as treasurer. She opened her talk in May about Project Santa Fe’s Clinical Lab 2.0 model—what it looks like now and the work they’re doing. We bring to you here what she shared there.