Linkedin X-twitter Youtube
Launch Digital Edition

Webinars and Sponsored Roundtables — Register Now

Tuesday, July 21, 2026, 11:00-11:30 AM CT

Learning Objectives:
  • Explain how transparency and manufacturer partnerships improve quality, consistency, and decision-making confidence in specimen management.
  • Evaluate blood collection tubes beyond cost and commodity assumptions, incorporating clinical impact and risk into decision-making.
  • Assess the potential risk points when using a blood collection device that has not been cleared for a specific purpose.

Roundtable presenters Nick Fingland, PhD, PMP, Senior Director, R&D Operations and Science, BD, and Chris Farnsworth, PhD, D(ABCC), Section Head of Clinical Chemistry, Professor of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Wednesday, July 29, 2026, 1:00-2:00 PM ET
Learn about digital pathology technology that is future-ready, yet practical for today’s
laboratory needs.

Webinar presenters Scott Hammond, Senior Systems Consultant, Digital Pathology Division, Wexner Medical Center, Department of Pathology, and Ursula Hofer, Imaging Technologist, Pathology Digital Imaging Lab, Wexner Medical Center, Department of Pathology, and Sandra Banky, PA(ASCP), Director of Operations, Wexner Medical Center, Department of Pathology.

Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY

Register Now

Subspecialties

Interactive Product Guides

Pathology

Digging into the interpretation of TSH results

Charna Albert May 2024—In a time of wellness testing and high rates of levothyroxine prescribing for hypothyroidism, it may also be time to rethink TSH test result interpretation. Laboratory testing is more accessible now than it used to be and patients are more involved in their own care. “You’re trying to give the patient access and ability to take care of their own health. But the double-edged sword is you can start over-ordering things, and the way we’ve designed lab

Labs juggle string of LDT unknowns

July 2024—Like a long-awaited second act, the FDA’s final rule regulating laboratory-developed tests as medical devices took the stage this spring. As with any FDA performance, this one opened to mixed reviews.

The spring curtain-raising followed the earlier proposed rule from last October, which drew some 6,500 responses during the public comment period. If that was an out-of-town tryout, no one quite knew what to expect from the rewrite, or if there would even be one.

As it turns out, there were indeed changes, but they didn’t necessarily bring clarity. As Jane Pine Wood, counsel for McDonald Hopkins, puts it, the final rule “certainly raised a whole lot more questions than it answered.”

The rule calls for a four-year, five-stage phaseout policy with the FDA enacting greater oversight of in vitro diagnostic products that are offered as LDTs.

Stage one, beginning on May 6, 2025, calls for labs to comply with medical device reporting requirements, correction and removal reporting requirements, and quality system requirements regarding complaint files.

Mayo pathologists create and test their own AI algorithms

July 2024—A Mayo Clinic project is “democratizing artificial intelligence,” its leaders say, by enabling pathologists with varying levels of AI expertise—most of whom had never before participated in an AI project—to create and implement algorithms.

Recommendations issued on PD-L1, TMB testing

July 2024—In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, a validated PD-L1 immunohistochemistry expression assay should be used, with other targetable genomic biomarker assays where appropriate, for the selection of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. And the appropriate validation should be performed on all specimen types and fixatives. Those are two of the six recommendations of the CAP, Association for Molecular Pathology, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Pulmonary Pathology Society, and LUNGevity Foundation, released in April and now in print in their PD-L1 and tumor mutation burden testing guideline for the selection of such therapies.

How rapid autopsies bridge clinical care and research

June 2024—Meagan Chambers, MD, MS, MSc, feels like she has signed on for a life of being on call for 2 AM autopsies, and she says nothing could please her more. She is a neuropathology fellow at the University of Washington and does many of the rapid autopsies that make possible a range of human research that would otherwise be limited or out of reach.

Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease

June 2024—Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease, which is driven by a cytokine storm with an unknown cause, is a difficult diagnosis and one that’s often delayed, owing to the disease’s rarity and nonspecific symptoms. “Patients often bounce around for months, or even years, to different specialties, based on how they present, before they are diagnosed,” said Jadee Neff, MD, PhD, assistant professor of pathology, Duke University Medical Center, in a CAP TODAY webinar in February made possible by a special educational grant from Recordati Rare Diseases.

Hybrid practice model beckons as solution

With the technology now available, could and should remote diagnostic pathology, or at least a hybrid model, become more the norm in the future? Timothy Craig Allen, MD, JD, and Casey P. Schukow …

Billing headwinds grow stronger for labs

April 2024—In billing for pathology and laboratory services, the hurdles are only getting higher. Narrow networks, prior authorizations, claims denials. Payers “have deeper pockets and figure they can outlast us,” said Joe Saad, MD, chair of the CAP Council on Government and Professional Affairs, in a Feb. 14 roundtable led online by CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle. He and others talked about AI, digital pathology codes and molecular Z-Codes, biomarker testing, and unity within the laboratory community.

Game’s afoot in bladder cancer research

March 2024—Like identifying the shift in battle that leads to victory, or the battle that wins the war—let alone declaring a war’s ultimate victor—it’s hard to gauge the whens, ifs, and hows that mark progress in medicine. For those who are deeply rooted in bringing advances to testing in urothelial cancers, current research is flourishing and flummoxing. In early and late stage, both for bladder and upper tract disease, recently approved therapies are leading to better outcomes for patients. More immunotherapies and antibody-drug conjugates are on their way, and with them come new options for testing. But as with any cancer, researchers follow numerous promising paths, knowing that some will dead-end and others will succeed primarily (albeit usefully) in raising more questions. Nevertheless, they continue to rally the work forward, with multiple breaches, and Agincourt, ever in sight. For experts such as David McConkey, PhD, progress will best be measured by how regularly precision makes its way into the clinical setting.

MARKETPLACE

TRENDING