Tag Archives: Data Innovations

March 2024—While Dr. Seuss’ assertion that “the more that you read, the more things you will know” is generally accurate, it doesn’t address the fact that how information is presented affects comprehension, a truism that is not lost on Edward Klatt, MD, who knows whereof he speaks when it comes to sharing information on patient portals.

Ocotber 2023—Health care technology companies, by and large, are eager to share product metrics—that is, standalone product performance—with potential pathology lab clients but less eager to share how those technologies may impact laboratory workflow and decision-making.

March 2021—For many pathologists, smartphones are an untapped resource. Although the screen is significantly smaller than a computer display, the device offers much of the same functionality to enhance the practice of pathology as its larger cousin but with the benefit of pocket portability.

June 2020—The global market for health care chatbots has been growing at a fairly rapid pace in recent years, but “COVID-19 is the thing that’s going to make chatbots mainstream,” says Greg Kefer, chief marketing officer at the chatbot company LifeLink Health. A 2019 Allied Market Research report, released just months prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, projected the health care chatbot industry would reach $345.3 million by 2026, a steep rise from 2018, when it garnered $116.9 million (www.allied​market​research.​com/healthcare-chatbots-market). But now, the COVID-19 pandemic has put into sharp relief one of the key value propositions of chatbots—unlimited scale, which means the timeline for adoption “just got massively compressed,” says Kefer, whose software-as-a-service company develops enterprise-level chatbots for large health care organizations.

September 2019—It’s a simple and nearly airtight communication strategy: Tell someone something verbally and then share the same message with them in writing to make sure they understood you. Following this logic, a group of surgical pathologists at the University of Minnesota Medical Center made an assumption that if their intraoperative consultation results were made available to surgeons in written form during surgery as documentation of verbal communication—either in person or via telephone—the frequency of communication errors would be reduced.