Tag Archives: Specimen integrity

November 2023—It was a mystery, wrapped less in an enigma than a few layers of bafflement, surprise, and mild irritation. Call it the Case of the Split Lung Specimens. The first hint something was amiss came when Alain Borczuk, MD, vice chair of anatomic pathology and co-director of thoracic pathology, Northwell Health, noticed that he and his colleagues were receiving more insufficient bronchoscopy specimens than usual. “When I say ‘increasing’—we don’t get that many bronchoscopies. It’s not like colon polyps,” says Dr. Borczuk, who is also director of oncologic pathology, Northwell Health Cancer Institute. Normally they would get a handful a week, some of them straightforward cancer cases, although these additional cases were tied to noncancerous conditions. And then the plot thickened even further, with missing pieces—literally. Though no guideline clearly states what constitutes an adequate specimen, Dr. Borczuk says, the samples he and his colleagues were seeing fell markedly short.

January 2023—The definition of “adequate” per the Merriam-Webster dictionary is “sufficient for a specific need.” In cytopathology, it is defined by the quantity and quality of the cellular material sampled. The final interpretation of a cytopathology report is almost universally preceded by an adequacy statement. While the essence of “adequacy” stays the same, its application varies depending on the specimen type and the site sampled. Furthermore, in the current era of personalized medicine, the definition of adequacy has expanded from “enough cells to make a morphologic diagnosis” to “enough cells to make a diagnosis and perform ancillary studies.”

September 2021—Taking steps to protect the integrity of specimens is at the heart of new and revised requirements in this year’s edition of the accreditation program checklists, set for release Sept. 22. A CAP team made up of members of the Checklists, Personalized Health Care, and Cytopathology committees collaborated to incorporate into the checklists the evidence-based recommendations set forth in a 2019 article on preanalytics and precision pathology. Many of the new and revised requirements, which are in seven checklists, are aimed at improving the quality of tissue and blood specimens that may undergo molecular testing for patients with cancer. The aim of others is to improve the preanalytic quality of specimens used for all types of testing.