Home >> ALL ISSUES >> 2021 Issues >> AMP case report: A CLL/SLL case with distinctive molecular and cytogenetic changes during different stages of disease progression

AMP case report: A CLL/SLL case with distinctive molecular and cytogenetic changes during different stages of disease progression

image_pdfCreate PDF

Our patient had a long disease course with multiple treatments and relapses. Drug resistance mutations were also identified in this patient during disease progression. A BTK p.C481S mutation was originally detected in the patient’s bone marrow sample collected in 2016, when he developed disease refractory to ibrutinib treatment. C481S is a well-characterized ibrutinib-resistant mutation that disrupts the irreversible covalent binding between ibrutinib and BTK.14 This mutation was not detected in the 2019 sample, indicating that the subclone harboring the resistance mutation might lose advantage in the absence of drug selection pressure and succumb to other subclones. A BTG1 p.S41R mutation was detected in the 2019 peripheral blood sample, after he failed venetoclax/rituximab, idelalisib/rituximab, and CAR T-cell therapies. BTG1 is a member of an antiproliferative gene family that regulates cell growth and differentiation. Notably, BTG1 mutations are rarely detected in untreated CLL/SLL but have been associated with resistance to venetoclax.15

In conclusion, CLL/SLL is a highly variable disease characterized by clonal and subclonal evolution of the leukemia cells. Novel mutations may appear or disappear corresponding to therapy selection. It is therefore beneficial to monitor the molecular profile longitudinally using NGS to tailor the individual therapy plan, especially when there is disease transformation.

  1. Guièze R, Wu CJ. Genomic and epigenomic heterogeneity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2015;126(4):445–453.
  2. Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, et al. iwCLL guidelines for diagnosis, indications for treatment, response assessment, and supportive management of CLL. Blood. 2018;131(25):2745–2760.
  3. Niederhuber JE, Armitage JO, Doroshow JH, Kastan MB, Tepper JE. Abeloff’s Clinical Oncology. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2020.
  4. Parikh SA, Shanafelt TD. Risk factors for Richter syndrome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2014;9(3):294–299.
  5. Landau DA, Carter SL, Stojanov P, et al. Evolution and impact of subclonal mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cell. 2013;152(4):714–726.
  6. Dierlamm J, Michaux L, Criel A, Wlodarska I, Van den Berghe H, Hossfeld DK. Genetic abnormalities in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and their clinical and prognostic implications. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1997;94(1):27–35.
  7. García-Santisteban I, Arregi I, Alonso-Mariño M, et al. A cellular reporter to evaluate CRM1 nuclear export activity: functional analysis of the cancer-related mutant E571K. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(24):4685–4699.
  8. Walker JS, Hing ZA, Harrington B, et al. Recurrent XPO1 mutations identified as predictive marker for advanced CLL progression. HemaSphere. 2019;3(Suppl 1):508.
  9. Eyre TA, Schuh A. An update for Richter syndrome—new directions and developments. Br J Haematol. 2017;178(4):508–520.
  10. Stamatopoulos B, Antoniou P, Vavoulis D, et al. Characterization of recurrent mutations in patient with a Richter syndrome by targeted next generation sequencing. Blood. 2016;128(22):3200.
  11. Jardin F, Pujals A, Pelletier L, et al. Recurrent mutations of the exportin 1 gene (XPO1) and their impact on selective inhibitor of nuclear export compounds sensitivity in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Am J Hematol. 2016;91(9):923–930.
  12. Nadeu F, Delgado J, Royo C, et al. Clinical impact of clonal and subclonal TP53, SF3B1, BIRC3, NOTCH1, and ATM mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(17):2122–2130.
  13. Fabbri G, Khiabanian H, Holmes AB, et al. Genetic lesions associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia transformation to Richter syndrome. J Exp Med. 2013;210(11):2273–2288.
  14. Woyach JA, Furman RR, Liu TM, et al. Resistance mechanisms for the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(24):2286–2294.
  15. Herling CD, Abedpour N, Weiss J, et al. Clonal dynamics towards the development of venetoclax resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):727.

Dr. Xu and Dr. Kulak are PGY-4 residents; Dr. Shi is a fellow in laboratory genetics and genomics; Dr. Chen is director of hematopathology, co-director of flow cytometry, and medical director of hematology and the hematopathology laboratory; Dr. Koduru is professor of pathology and medical director of the genetics diagnostics laboratories; and Dr. Gagan is assistant professor and associate medical director of the next-generation sequencing laboratory—all at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

Test yourself

 

  • Here are three questions taken from the case report.
  • Answers

1. Richter transformation is the development of an aggressive large-cell lymphoma in the setting of underlying chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. What is the most common aggressive lymphoma seen in Richter trans­formation?
a. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
b. Hodgkin lymphoma
c. T-cell lymphoma
d. Composite lymphoma

2. Mutation in which of the following genes is most commonly associated with ibrutinib resistance?
a. TP53
b. BTK
c. BTG1
d. SF3B1

3. Which cytogenetic change is associated with good prognosis in CLL?
a. Complex karyotype
b. 17p deletion
c. Isolated 13q deletion
d. Normal karyotype

1. Richter transformation is the development of an aggressive large-cell lymphoma in the setting of underlying chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. What is the most common aggressive lymphoma seen in Richter trans­formation?
a. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
b. Hodgkin lymphoma
c. T-cell lymphoma
d. Composite lymphoma

2. Mutation in which of the following genes is most commonly associated with ibrutinib resistance?
a. TP53
b. BTK
c. BTG1
d. SF3B1

3. Which cytogenetic change is associated with good prognosis in CLL?
a. Complex karyotype
b. 17p deletion
c. Isolated 13q deletion
d. Normal karyotype

CAP TODAY
X