Tuesday, April 28, 2026, 12:00 PM–1:00 PM ET
Discover how next-day comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is possible with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on the Genexus System—delivering both speed and accuracy.
Webinar presenters Jane Bayani, MHSc, PhD, Assistant Professor and Co-Director, Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada, and Nicola Normanno, MD, Scientific Director, IRCCS Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors, Italy, and Morten Grauslund, PhD, Molecular Biologist, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic applications.
Thursday, April 30, 2026, 11:00 AM–12:00 PM ET
Hear an expert discuss how Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is utilizing
the oncoReveal® Nexus 21-gene panel to redefine turnaround time and actionable insights
in cancer care. Dr. Ewalt shares a perceptive look at the clinical need for rapid, front-line NGS sequencing, and how a unique, purpose built targeted NGS panel (Pillar Biosciences’ oncoReveal Nexus 21 gene Panel) was developed, validated and implemented clinically by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK-REACT) to complement their current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) approach.
Webinar presenter Mark Ewalt, MD, Associate Medical Director for Laboratory Operations for Diagnostic Molecular Pathology in the Molecular Diagnostics Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MSKCC.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
CAP TODAY does not endorse any of the products or services named within. The webinar is made possible by a special educational grant from Pillar Biosciences.
Thursday, May 28, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET
This session is designed to improve understanding and application of recent updates to synoptic pathology reporting protocols such as the latest Reporting Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. These changes reflect evolving clinical guidelines that directly influence diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection in breast cancer care.
Webinar presenters Thaer Khoury, MD, FCAP, Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Cente, and Colin Murphy, CEO of mTuitive.
Moderated by: Bob McGonnagle, Publisher, CAP TODAY
June 2023—Although goblet cell adenocarcinoma can label for neuroendocrine markers, it behaves as an adenocarcinoma and is staged as such. And it’s important to distinguish goblet cell adenocarcinoma from tubular neuroendocrine tumor, a rare subtype of neuroendocrine tumor.
May 2023—How to distinguish appendiceal diverticular disease and appendiceal polyps from mucinous neoplasms was just part of a CAP22 course on appendiceal lesions, led by Maryam Pezhouh, MD, MSc, of the University of California, San Diego, and Jacqueline Birkness-Gartman, MD, of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
April 2023—With serous ovarian carcinomas and other gynecologic tumors, it’s molecular testing that increasingly sets the treatment course. “As pathologists, it’s exciting to us,” said Sadia Sayeed, MD, speaking at CAP22. “We’re learning that the immunostains we’re interpreting have greater implications than we ever thought they could.”
April 2023—Another administrative layer and “up in the air” is how lab billing experts describe what the No Surprises Act requires of laboratories and where things stand. When they met online March 3 with CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle, they talked about this and digital pathology and the problems of no or slow payments. “Compared with five years ago, the number of denials has increased and turnaround time on full payment on a claim has lengthened significantly,” said Tom Scheanwald of APS Medical Billing.
March 2023—With endometrial carcinomas and other gynecologic tumors, molecular testing matters, and not only at the diagnostic stage. “We’re rapidly evolving,” said Leslie M. Randall, MD, MAS, division director of gynecologic oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, speaking at CAP22.
March 2023—Assessing cardiac allograft rejection from endomyocardial biopsy and assigning a differential diagnosis to cancers of unknown origin have been shown to get a boost from AI-driven computational pathology models. So too has identifying subregions of high diagnostic value on whole slide images.
February 2023—Like a thriving expat, Deborah Dillon, MD, is comfortable moving within worlds both old and new. Specifically, as a breast and molecular pathologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, she appreciates the biomarkers she and her colleagues grew up with, so to speak, as well as those that are part of a more recently arrived-at scenery. Not everyone finds both worlds equally riveting. “A lot of people are much more interested in, and excited by, new markers,” she says. “When I talk to people from pharma, this is what they want to hear about.” So do many pathologists, oncologists, and patients—new markers and new therapies have a way of updating hopes. Dr. Dillon understands the persistent thrill of the new, why people want her to talk the language of PIK3CA, PARP inhibitors, MMR, NTRK fusions, ESR1, and the like. But as an in-demand speaker as well as in a recent interview with CAP TODAY, she also advocates for making the old—the longstanding trinity of ER, PR, and HER2—seem new again.
February 2023—Consensus on the best ways to stem unnecessary laboratory testing, and spare health care systems and patients its negative effects, is still elusive.
February 2023—As this year’s guide to anatomic pathology computer systems was taking shape, CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle met online with representatives of five companies and with John Sinard, MD, PhD, of Yale University School of Medicine. They talked about the cloud, CPT codes, training of pathology informaticians, and artificial intelligence, for which the time frame in pathology is far longer than it’s been portrayed, in Dr. Sinard’s view. “It will start to impact the careers of some of our trainees, but it’s probably a 10- to 20-year time frame before it plays a major role,” he said. The view of Joe Nollar of Xifin: “Speculation that AI will someday replace pathologists is completely overblown,” though it will help to triage cases and mitigate risk. Their full conversation, which took place Dec. 20, 2022, follows.
January 2023—Laura Esserman, MD, MBA, can still recall her Eureka moment. She had just seen a talk on residual cancer burden by pathologist W. Fraser Symmans, MB.ChB, a pioneer in the field. “When I saw Fraser present this,” says Dr. Esserman, director, University of California San Francisco Breast Care Center, “I knew immediately that MRI would work and that residual cancer burden would complement it. MRI was basically a snapshot of RCB over time. I realized that we had to institute RCB—we had to standardize our approach.” Until then, she and her colleagues across the I-SPY trial sites relied on individual pathologist assessment for each case. The pathologic complete response rate, or pCR, hovered at about 34 percent. That insight was soon followed by another. Intrigued by what she heard, Dr. Esserman and her pathologist colleagues from all the I-SPY sites traveled to MD Anderson, where Dr. Symmans helped develop the residual cancer burden system, for training.
